This idea came about through discussion - with one of Pri's Grandstudents (I could be Pri's Great Grandstudent!) - on how to overcome 2 dozen bets during cycle events of length 2 and above, so that we only ever bet 1 dozen at a time to target a specific event within dozen cycles.
Cycle: 323
=
*Cycle Length 2
*Order 1
*Defined by 3
The new constant I have named is Extending Element - unless Priyanka already has an official name for it..?? It's only attributable to cycles greater than length 1.
323
Dozen 2 in the middle is what extended the cycle to length 2, and it happens to be Counter-Clockwise to the Previous Defining Element AKA Pre-defining Element!
Normally, we would bet 1+2 to extend the cycle, but that's is a 2 dozen bet; above we can say specifically that Dozen 2 was responsible for extending the cycle. Both order and defining describe which dozen won the cycle, and CL describe the duration/length of the cycle before closure, so I feel the extending element is a worthy edition as it also describes a winning bet within the cycle.
Cycle: 323
=
*Cycle Length 2
*Defined by 3
*Order 1 = defined by same (order 2/3 = defined by different)
*Extended CC
Each cycle could be given 3 values to match the other 3 constants:
1: Non-Extending, i.e. CL1
2: Clockwise
3: Counter-Clockwise
To get from CL2 > CL3 we just bet the last remaining dozen, so there's no need for any additional constant there. Quad Cycles, however, would require 2 of these new constants.
Any thoughts/feedback?
I've come up with another new constant to try to help predict Cycle Length.
CL1 = Defined by Same
CL2 and 3 = Defined by Different
So they are composed of same elements.
We need more granular info about Defining Element I reckon in order to predict next CL.
Defined by
1
1
3
2
2
2 = defined by 1 cluster back
3 = defined by 2 clusters back
1 = defined by 3 clusters back
This new constant with values 1,2 or 3 I've named Reverse Order or Reverse Defining Order.