This *seems* to work pretty well, from my initial testings. It's played with 1 Doublestreet, with a set, limited progression.
TRIGGER- Calculating from the current dozen hit, Spin until the THIRD last dozen hit. When the third last dozen hit, bet the unhit doublestreet within that doz hit (each doz consists of 2 doublestreets!)
Progression: 1,1,1,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 STOP. This is the risk we're taking. From my first testings i only broke out of this range ONCE during 5 sessions. And i did recover, without problem. (as you can see in the last chart) So, this progression-range works in *most* cases,
Bankroll needed:
100u playing with 1u bets
500u playing with 5u bets
First tests was played with 5u bets (wingoal +500u, stoploss -500u)
5/5 Games won
Looks good the 5 times achieved bankroll. Safe enough.
What could happen if though we had not any waiting time and triggers? Just pick a random DS per spin or just stick to a DS and keep betting there.
I think the graphs and profit would have been the same. Is it any advantage with such bet selection? Maybe just any DS bet every spin would be the same. ;)
Quote from: BellagioOwner on Nov 30, 10:50 AM 2016
Looks good the 5 times achieved bankroll. Safe enough.
What could happen if though we had not any waiting time and triggers? Just pick a random DS per spin or just stick to a DS and keep betting there.
I think the graphs and profit would have been the same. Is it any advantage with such bet selection? Maybe just any DS bet every spin would be the same. ;)
Yes, playing live, it can be too much waiting time, perhaps? you could try that? Random is random, but i imagine my trigger and the waiting time makes a difference(?)
Quote from: ignatus on Nov 30, 11:17 AM 2016but i imagine my trigger and the waiting time makes a difference(?)
if a system is not based on Standard deviation and variance I don't see a big reason why there should be wait time and not just start betting with the progression/ MM someone has on his mind as a concept.
It would be interesting to see the same system to be tested with no trigger waiting time but straight betting every spin same doublestreet :)
MM and progression looks solid though
OK, so due the complaints i tried a new trigger: -Wait for a new doz hit, then bet the "other" unhit DS within that particular doz hit.
It broke out of the progressionline once, but did recover
Well, that didn't hold for long, two beakouts and a loss. Any idea for a better trigger for one DS is welcome,....
Quote from: BellagioOwner on Nov 30, 10:50 AM 2016
Just pick a random DS per spin or just stick to a DS and keep betting there.
I think the graphs and profit would have been the same.
NO, i tried a new trigger and it didn't work at all. Your're wrong. I stick to the original rules.