was wondering if anyone could give an idea of what is the expected appearance of neighbours showing.
have been waiting for 5 spins with no neighbours showing then betting for them to show.
in 3x1hour sessions i have not had to bet more than 3 units per number starting at .50p.
if anyone has tried this or similar, what amount of spins can i expect when the tunnel with no light appears.
cheers in advance. :question:
i have seen everything....
but you can expect about 20 times average with no show even at live dealer roulette.
this if u r playing for the 2 neighbour from last spin to apear.
i would try +1 chip win or loss beggining my bets between 10 - 13 no shows.
cheers
Quote from: albertojonas on Oct 15, 09:39 PM 2010
I have seen everything....
but you can expect about 20 times average with no show even at live dealer roulette.
this if you are playing for the 2 neighbour from last spin to apear.
i would try +1 chip win or loss beggining my bets between 10 - 13 no shows.
cheers
hello alberto,
thanks for the reply, but this is not how i am playing.
i wait for five numbers that do not have any neighbours in that five. i then bet on all those five numbers neighbours adding the next spins neighbours to the first five numbers . this means you can be betting on up to fourteen numbers neighbours, this does not mean twenty eight numbers as they cross over and there is also repeaters.
hope this makes sense, what i am a asking is what could i expect as a bad run.
i might add that i have only tried this for three hour sessions, it is only an idea. the point being that neighbours can not hide betting like this. or can they :twisted:
>:(
i am sorry for the misunderstanding. It is a nice idea. We have to test it.
But post some more details please.
What prog do u use?
what's the stop loss?
Can you please also had some example "just to see things moving"
another 2xhour sessions, 1st was all good 2nd went 13 spins before a neighbour hit. progression gets too much for me.
stop loss or recoupe required. :'( :'( :'(
another 2xhour sessions, both went like clockwork , no more than 4 bets. this gives around 100 units profit starting at 50p.
Hi mates,
You are not reading Victor's teachings carefully or maybe you are not reading him at all. It is a pity. He is the one who has given the right clues to beat roulette. And now you are pointing to one of the legs of the table to beat roulette. Neighbours!!!!! Go on but read him, please. Nevertheless held in mind that a table doesnt stand only on one leg. Repeaters exist all the same. And black-red pockets. Not to say 3 positions of numbers on the wheel forming 3 columns.
Sorry if im disturbing your thread.
Cheers,
Carlos.
Quote from: carpanta on Oct 16, 07:10 PM 2010
Hi mates,
You are not reading Victor's teachings carefully or maybe you are not reading him at all. It is a pity. He is the one who has given the right clues to beat roulette. And now you are pointing to one of the legs of the table to beat roulette. Neighbours!!!!! Go on but read him, please. Nevertheless held in mind that a table doesn't stand only on one leg. Repeaters exist all the same. And black-red pockets. Not to say 3 positions of numbers on the wheel forming 3 columns.
Sorry if I'm disturbing your thread.
Cheers,
Carlos.
Mr. Victor has proposed his theory about the neighbors scattered in many posts.
If I understood it becomes the task to make a primer for the more common occurrences.
You must have two opposite events. In the case of neighbors would be repeater. Then when no neighbor comes to an end you will play the other event which is repeaters.
So they have covered the normal events and the deviation extremes events.
The game mentioned for all situations in play.
If I understood he asks us to have the task of creating charts for neighbor bets.
Greetings.
Wannawin.
there are no wrong bets! 8)
Yes, there are. Those raked off from the table.
what do you mean "ranked off"?? ???
why is everyone talking in riddles????????????????????
:wink: :question: :sad2: ??? ???