#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Bet selection => Topic started by: ignatus on Mar 16, 05:14 AM 2017

Title: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: ignatus on Mar 16, 05:14 AM 2017
Procedure:

Pick one side (H/L) Now first hit, within that particular H/L- Bet the two unhit Doublestreets within that particular H/L, also put 1u on Doz 1 or 3, (depending on which side)- doz 1 or 3 bet is the Oppisite side of the Doublestreets bet. Now, double bets for each loss, until hit. WHEN hit, restart procedure -bet the same H/L, the 2 unhit ds..+1u on the opposite dozen (1 or 3)...

Bank: 500-1000u

I've made a video


Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: Sina Rostami on Mar 26, 02:09 AM 2017
Nice strategy however, If  for instance, we start betting only on dozen 3 and 1 ( i.e. last number spun was 16),  then we only rely on 1 dozen for profit, and it can easily sleep as far as we can lose. This strategy needs a trigger to start betting. one possible trigger maybe waiting for 4 H or 4 L in a row, then starting to bet based on the last Number spun.
Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: ignatus on Apr 11, 12:43 PM 2017
I'm going back to test this system more, see if I can get a higher winrate than 80% (that's the best i can get, obviously?) Anyway i think a tight stoploss should be used, i try +100/-100 with 1u bets, +500/-500 with 5u bets...

I need help testing,...

(First test was played with 5u bets)

Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: brenoregio on Apr 12, 09:08 AM 2017
Quote from: ignatus on Apr 11, 12:43 PM 2017
I'm going back to test this system more, see if I can get a higher winrate than 80% (that's the best i can get, obviously?) Anyway i think a tight stoploss should be used, i try +100/-100 with 1u bets, +500/-500 with 5u bets...

I need help testing,...

(First test was played with 5u bets)
Have you tested this system using D'Alembert? As the return risk is the same, using D'Alembert can be a good management strategy.
Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: ignatus on Apr 19, 01:30 PM 2017
Quote from: brenoregio on Apr 12, 09:08 AM 2017Have you tested this system using D'Alembert? As the return risk is the same, using D'Alembert can be a good management strategy.

Thanks. Works perfect from a first test.. :)
Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: ignatus on Apr 19, 01:31 PM 2017
D'Alembert-progression (+1/-1)

Played with random numbers in RX
Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: ignatus on Nov 05, 09:14 AM 2017
Played almost same way; --> but with Chales King's progression (+1/-2) ALSO if not reached a new high (and you're supposed to bet 1u), i *start* betting 2u until recovered, Then reset to 1u.

Test 1.
Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: Suecia on Nov 17, 09:19 PM 2017
Quote from: ignatus on Nov 05, 09:14 AM 2017
Played almost same way; --> but with Chales King's progression (+1/-2) ALSO if not reached a new high (and you're supposed to bet 1u), i *start* betting 2u until recovered, Then reset to 1u.

Test 1.

backtested using this progression aginst 8h sessions, just don't the betting 2u part until recovery.
Without more tweaks its to unrealiable :/
Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: ignatus on Nov 18, 12:02 AM 2017
Quote from: Suecia on Nov 17, 09:19 PM 2017Without more tweaks its to unrealiable :/

ok, thanks for testing. :) you don't want to tell about the tweak, and the progression used in the topmost graph?
Title: Re: Martingrail FINAL
Post by: Suecia on Nov 18, 01:20 PM 2017
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough.

The different graphs are 11 different 8h sessions saved from live roulette tables.
So the best one is just a favorable session, nothing else.