OK Here we go. This is a doubledozen system. I *think* i found a better trigger than "come out of her 1". We'll see how far this one goes! O0
=================================
Procedure: Wait for a dozen to repeat; (Hit 2 times in a row), NOW you wait for this repeat to END. THEN when this repeat has Ended (and a New doz hit) you do a 2 step attack;
1-->> First spin you bet that this Repeating doz will *Not* hit again.
2-->> Second spin IF it hits again, you bet that this Repeating dozen will *Not* Repeat again.
3 STOP (Repeat Procedure)
=================================
Progression: Negative Fibonacci Ladder
1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377
For each loss +1 step in the ladder, AND keep that bet in the progressionline, until reached a new high/breakeven, then reset to 1u.
=================================
Bankroll: 300u
Stoploss: -200u
Wingoal: +100u
(played with 5u bets)
=================================
First tests was played with Live-spins (5u bets)
5/5 Games won
Ignatus, I got good news for you: all your systems work - past and present - but they simply need to be played within a Non-Random framework to control all the draw-downs and crazy variance; you get me?
Alright, first test session is done, 8/10 Games won. I could say "This is the final stats"? But i think it's unfair, and i had extreme bad luck(?) I think it could preform better. I need help testing this, to see if the stats gets worse or better, can't say anything for sure yet.
Although if you would calculate how many triggers won, that would easily be over 90-95% winrate.
Any ideas of tweak you can think of would be great? Perhaps lower the stoploss? Moneymanagement is a big issue, (as always).
Still, 8/10 for a doubledozen system is OK, i my opinion, i only want it to preform better, that's all....
12/15 Games won Still 80% winrate. Guess i have to be satisfied with that(?)...
Hi IG
Do you remember AMK. I think he said play a method once, then play another.
So if you had a top 10 of your methods, we could play once,move on, hope the algorithm wont catch on, and be away with the winnings.
What do you think
Quote from: nottophammer on May 12, 07:08 PM 2017
Hi IG
Do you remember AMK. I think he said play a method once, then play another.
So if you had a top 10 of your methods, we could play once,move on, hope the algorithm wont catch on, and be away with the winnings.
What do you think
Hi All,
Thanks God.
Good Morning.
Thanks Sir Ignatus and Sir Notto,
That's exactly how I play. using my top 4 methods, but still sometimes I become victim of casinos, may be this is a good idea if I try top 10 methods. also I have managed long losses run by flatbet for at least 3 times, then use marti.
Any improvement idea is most welcome sir.
Love and Light,
SugTips