On a whim I switched to my green tablets for a bit of variety and all of a sudden was struck by an idea -- the first for several decades.
It's all to do with using Bayes' Z-score program...
link:://rouletteforum.cc/other-software/stats-tracker-software/ (link:://rouletteforum.cc/other-software/stats-tracker-software/)
... to detect dodgy RNG casinos.
What if you develop or use a system that gives say, a Z-score of 2.5 or more on a live wheel.
And then play that same system on an RNG casino?
If you consistently get under 2.5 then, surely, that would be an indication of biased/doctored RNG software at that particular casino?
Whaddya reckon?
Good idea dear Esoito.
If your method doesn't use physics in any form (i.e. moves strictly in the "math" or probabilistic game), then the answer is yes!, it could be a way, since the "math game" is supposed to use the roulette device as a fair RNG hence from the fair casino's point of view there shouldn't be any difference. Yet only under that "no physics" condition.
Remember for some form of plays, the z-core value's performance is strictly linked to the game being physical. i.e. the sustained value for Advantage-play where the edge is certifiably real as per coming from using physical factors.
Thanks for being sharp and by all means keep the brain... "storming" :)
Cheers!
Vic
Good thinking Esoito. A friend gave me this tip. Before you play, check the Random Jackpots on the slots. If the number is high (say over 5000) on many of the slots there's a good chance the casino may be generous on RNGs. If under 5000, watch out--the casino may have given out a lot of money and is now trying to recoup its losses.
I wonder what the z-score differences would be between the two scenarios.
Have u tried it out on RNgG casino Esoito?
I have a candidate for u- EUROGRAND rng.!!
Love to know the out come.
Or even better, tell me how to set up the Bayes tool, and i'll do the comparison between their RNG wheel, and their live wheel. Their LIVE is pretty good, and i have won there.
OK, Chrisbis.
But first, you need to get a strategy that gives a consistent 2.5 or better on the z-score. (The higher the better, of course.)
And that, my friend, will be a challenge all in itself...!
[for your information: Bayes has explained his z-score (and other related stuff) in his detailed and interesting posts. The SEARCH function will reveal them.]
George has recently (today) put this up.
I am trying it right now, and its working for me.
I started with BR of Ã,£16.50........ and now im at Ã,£39.00
Only using Ã,£0.50 bet units so its an increase of +45units!!
Try it out.
Should meet ur Z-score of 2.5 i feel, but need thorough testing.
I like it tho.
@chrisbis
"George has recently (today) put this up."
What exactly is "this" referring to?