When playing "Hangman 6", i noticed when those 12 numbers decided to SLEEP, progression could go very far, So, therefore this one "Quad Core Nut" played with 2-4 Quads, reduces risk, BECAUSE it won't sleep forever, (less risk that it will happen) AND Less units bet. From my first testings i playd with a simple martingale, (but you could try other progressions, if you like) That's the way i play, O0
Procedure: Wait for a hit in column 1 or 3 then bet 2 QUADS within that particular dozen, (at the 2 unhit columns)...Now, wait for a SECOND hit within column 1 or 3 in a new dozen, so another 2 QUADS are placed within that dozen, at the 2 unhit columns. WHEN 4 quads are bet--double bets once, and then double for each loss until hit.
wingoal (?)
BR/Stoploss: 300u
(first test played with random spins in RX, and 1u bets, highest step in progression step 5,.. 32u (2 4 8 16 32.)
When I see how many systems you came out so far with, I say to myself how great that we have you here
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Oct 25, 07:42 AM 2017
When I see how many systems you came out so far with, I say to myself how great that we have you here
Thanks Roulettebeater! :) if you like any system, feel free to test it yourself, and share your result :thumbsup:
Well now, i tried a different progression -Fibonacci- and it seems to work pretty good.....as you can see in the chart the drop was about 300u, BUT considering it went to STEP 8, (55u) i think that was not bad at all. That would've been devastating using Martingale, for an example. How to play this? -Go back 2-3 steps in the progressionline after a win, (if not reached a new high) depending how far the progression has gone,.. Otherwise, always Start the progression with 2u when 4 Quads are bet, (you begin with 1u with the first 2 Quads-- 2u When 4 quads bet, and from there you start the fibonacci-progression)...
2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377
BR/Stoploss: ~400-500u