OK, found something here, interesting!, My betselection is 15 numbers FLATBET (see pic) This was, from testings a Static-bet.
What is remarkable about it IS that a reccuring pattern occurs, (most of the time), First it goes UP then, DOWN. so? could this be useful? You tell me?
I figure IF playing this; wingoal should be no more than 300u, so anything between 1-300u could be a decent wingoal
playing this way 5/6 Games won from the first test, (Only 1 chart did go straight down).
(More testings is needed ofcourse).
Static bet?
You bet same 15 numbers each time ?
Your graphs look scary, I didn't like them !
The tendency is negative.
It's jut my opinion though !
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Apr 27, 01:31 PM 2018Your graphs look scary, I didn't like them !
The tendency is negative.
My point WAS that the graphs showed a POSITIVE result for X number of spins, THEN went down. (This was the tendency).
Now, i tried play it with the "Oscar's Grind"-progression (UP as you win); +1u for each HIT (if not reached a new high) until reched a new high, then RESET. with good result.....
Then use dynamic groups (not static) with positive progression and the graphs will look even better.
You could track ( i give you tracker, excel) more systems at the same time , for example systems based on 6 or 9 numbers
groups and bet for an event like second last or 3rd position, this way you will have a dynamic bet , you will change most of
the times the group to bet next spin.
Other option is bet dealer signature based methods ( CW and CCW ) .....
Quote from: Kattila on Apr 27, 02:45 PM 2018Then use dynamic groups (not static) with positive progression and the graphs will look even better.
You could track ( i give you tracker, excel) more systems at the same time , for example systems based on 6 or 9 numbers
groups
Thanks Kattila,
i really doubt changing bets would "increase the accuracy" or "hitrate" as Steve would say. Random is Random.. only betselection matters now (how many numbers are bet)
i've tried betting 6-9 numbers , but results was not as good as with this (15 numbers) bet. Could you show me 10 such graphs with a positive result? i doubt,.. :/
Quote from: ignatus on Apr 27, 02:02 PM 2018
My point WAS that the graphs showed a POSITIVE result for X number of spins, THEN went down. (This was the tendency).
Now, i tried play it with the "Oscar's Grind"-progression (UP as you win); +1u for each HIT (if not reached a new high) until reched a new high, then RESET. with good result.....
Don't waste time in anything that tends to be negative ... use that time for something better, maybe with the family ? Or watch a nice movie ..
this is the quote of the day from me !
Hi Ignatus,
I can t replicate 10 x that 60 000 spins ( in positive ), that is sure .
There are good and bad bet selections no matter how many numbers we bet ( 6, 9 or 15 or....).
I want you to look at this *patterns* on my chart and one of yours.
You can see when we should start to bet (after win) and when stop (or reduce bets) when
system start to go down, bet every spin is a bad idea . I don t say is the final solution but is
a good way to play.