I visited today German forum and found 2 interesting systems. I will translate it to you.
The first one even down in deep sheet didn't lost yet. Guy was down 8000 Euro and in 30 minutes got in plus again! I would like to see it with my own eyes.
First System:
Put 10 units on Red and one unit on 5 splits (2 #s) 8/11, 10/13, 17/20, 26/29 and 28/31. Together 15 units. If you lose rise Red to 20 units, and the 5 splits to 2 units, if loss again rise Red to 30 units and the 5 splits to 3 units. If you are losing you bet the higher bets until in plus again (+1 unit) then reset to minimum again.
He plays it with 10 cent a unit and makes 50 Euro every day. Only on European roulette possible!
Second System:
Mark 18 spins and bet 2 best D or C till 37 spins. Start with 1/1 unit and at win rise to 2 units each. After 2 wins go back to 1/1 unit again and after win rise to 2/2 units. But remember: after each loss go to 1/1 unit and stay there until win.
That's all.
Auf Wiedersehen
Hermes
If i was you hermes i would stay away from the german forums. Just tested both methods out and lost a fortune :(
???
Quote from: Kingspin on Oct 29, 08:55 AM 2010
If I was you hermes I would stay away from the german forums. Just tested both methods out and lost a fortune :(
???
oooooo i know how that feels !
Systems are bunkum huh ?
These 2 systems are i am sure the worst systems I have ever played for real money. :ooh:
Lost several k in a few minutes........... :'(
Quote from: Kingspin on Oct 29, 09:02 AM 2010
These 2 systems are I am sure the worst systems I have ever played for real money. :ooh:
Lost several k in a few minutes........... :'(
Phuck and double Phuck :( !
QUOTE: "Guy was down 8000 Euro and in 30 minutes got in plus again! I would like to see it with my own eyes. "
The 'Alarm Bells" would be ringing for me right there. Any system that has you down 8000 Euro, no matter what your bankroll is frightening.
Kingspin I didn't told you to play with money. This happens mostly in kindergarten not between adults. I didn't tested them but if I would it would be demo tests for fun not live. I am scientist not gambler.
I would play the first system like that:
Look on scoreboard which EC is dominant Red or Black? Than play that one with those splits.
R + 8/11, 10/13, 17/20, 26/29, 28/31.
B + 9/12, 16/19, 18/21, 27/30.
Or play always second last result. e.g.. RRRBR bet B. RRRBRR bet R.
The second system actually should work because it has a clever progression. Win +1 unit for 2 wins only, loss go to minimum bets.
Hermes
Quote from: Kingspin on Oct 29, 09:02 AM 2010
These 2 systems are I am sure the worst systems I have ever played for real money. :ooh:
Lost several k in a few minutes........... :'(
What are you doing.!!!!Why didn't you test this system first,over at dublin bet or maybe at wisbaden casino where you can download spins from their actual casino then you could have run this system through the spins to see how it performed.
Never ever just play a system with real money before testing it first its madness ???
I am sticking with john golds streets method , it's a good winner for me. I thin people should only post systems that they know for sure are reasonably good.
Quote from: Kingspin on Oct 30, 06:36 AM 2010
I am sticking with john golds streets method , it's a good winner for me. I thin people should only post systems that they know for sure are reasonably good.
Kingspin,
I too like John Golds street method.
Very similar to FLATINO's consistent winning bet system, but a little easier for me to play since it follows the natural streets rather than creating 9 sectors and playing 8 splits instead of 4 or 5 lines.
With a little luck, you'll recoup your losses quickly.
I think that's a good idea. The idea of testing systems thoroughly before posting in full systems.
Maybe we should have a rule that if you post a full system you should have tested it a certain number of spins.
I know that I'm guility of not testing some of my posts enough and when people start talking about playing for real money, I start getting a little nervous because I'm not sure how it works over the long haul.
Of course Hermes is also right, we should take every system with a grain of salt and be sure in our own mind before playing for real money.
Sorry about your loss.
Good luck on the recovery.
George
Any link for this John Golds street?
found it on another forum.
Since i got there for free i hope the author doesn't mind i quote it here...
John's street system.
Ã,« on: September 23, 2010, 04:14:04 PM Ã,»
ReplyReply
Here I am going to post a street system. It is not difficult to understand but you need to spend some time working through the mechanics of it before you can unleash it on the casino.
The bet will see you betting 4 streets at a time. I am going to put up the progression first for the bet.
It is 10 steps, however you will see in my testing from today that I don't pass step 4. Some of you may like to use the extra steps if necessary..
1) 4 chip outlay. win 12. profit 8 / loss 4.
2) 4 chip outlay. win 12. profit 4 / loss 8.
3) 8 chip outlay. win 24. profit 8 / loss 16.
4) 12 chip outlay. win 36. profit 8 / loss 28.
5) 16 chip outlay. win 48. profit 4 / loss 44.
6) 24 chip outlay. win 72. profit 4 / loss 68.
7) 36 chip outlay. win 108. profit 4 / loss 104.
8. 56 chip outlay. win 168. profit 8 / loss 160.
9) 84 chip outlay. win 252. profit 8 / loss 244.
10) 124 chip outlay. win 372. profit 4 / loss 368.
If you lost all 10 steps of that progression, you would have lost 368. But just to give you a typical idea of when the wins come, here is today's test results showing you when the wins came.
2/1/3/3/3/2/4/2/4/2/2/4/2/3/1/1/3/1/1/3/1/2/4/1/1.
Hits on 1 = 8.
Hits on 2 = 7.
Hits on 3 = 6.
Hits on 4 = 4.
The average win is 6 units profit on any win using the 10 step progression. The profit for testing today was 172 units. System to follow.
that's it
@albertojonas. I am John Gold on the other forum.
What I will do is go into word and copy and paste what I wrote. Then I will post it up here in the full systems section. I was adding bits along the way to try and make it more stable and avoid any heavy drawdowns. So what you have written is only the first post. There was a lot more info that I added as I went along working on it.
i did no ment to offend
i also think you must publish it here on your own,
i like your system. i have one very similar.
nice to have you
alberto, please don't think I have taken any offence, I am glad you like the system. Maybe we could create something even better by merging the 2 of them together. :thumbsup:
we could aply the concept sugested by bayes. im trying to discover how in relation with the hot streets.
I also do not believe in the progression after 4 steps
maybe other prog....
(maybe we're out of topic here)
Quote from: flukey luke on Oct 31, 08:57 AM 2010
Alberto, please don't think I have taken any offence, I am glad you like the system. Maybe we could create something even better by merging the 2 of them together. :thumbsup:
That's the spirit!
Thanks FL :thumbsup: