Moving on, this may be my best system Ever? (if i may say so myself?) i got 8/10 Wins, FLATBET.
Now, this is a combination of two old systems,(Hotzone & General Cluster 1) that basic idea i've been working on for many years... --As i said back then-- The only thing i know about the wheel, for sure, IS that numbers always seems to hit in clusters. And this idea, was the basis of all General Cluster variations, and the 'so famous' Hotzone.
GC9 Procedure:
(1) BET current number hit and it's 2 neighbors on the wheel, (3 numbers) THEN do 2 spins, (IF hit, repeat procedure)
if loss
(2) Bet a Second current number hit and it's 2 neighbors (3 number bet,--Now we got 3+3 number bet) THEN do 2 spins, IF hit restart at step (1).
if loss
(3) Bet a third current number hit and it's 2 neighbours (2 numbers bet,--Now we got 3+3+3 number bet) THEN do 2 spins, IF win or lose re-start at step (1).
All three steps will cost in total 36u. (3+3)+(6+6)+(9+9)=36.
BR: 1u bets (a minimum of 200u), 5u bets (a minimum of 1000u)
Takeprofit/wg; what i figure, first you go for +500u (5u bets), if that target is not reached and you come to a negative balance, you lower your wingoal to 300u. IF you reach +500u you *continue* playing UNTIL all three steps are lost. Once all three steps lost , you STOP.
Stoploss: Depending how you play/(the risk you want to take), either STOP at -400u, OR -1000u.
:'(
==============================
Test: General Cluster Nine Flat @ Celtic Casino
European Wheel-Monday, May 21,2018 @ 11:25pm CDT USA
#12 (newest spin-value)
Bet 28,12,35: 1.) 2(x)-3 2.) 8(x)-3*
Bet 28,12,35 & 30,8,23: 3.) 7(x)-6 4.) 5(x)-6
Bet 28,12,35 & 30,8,23 & 10,5,24: 5.) 7(x)-9 6.) 7(x)-9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-36
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on May 22, 12:35 AM 2018
:'(
==============================
Test: General Cluster Nine Flat @ Celtic Casino
European Wheel-Monday, May 21,2018 @ 11:25pm CDT USA
#12 (newest spin-value)
Bet 28,12,35: 1.) 2(x)-3 2.) 8(x)-3*
Bet 28,12,35 & 30,8,23: 3.) 7(x)-6 4.) 5(x)-6
Bet 28,12,35 & 30,8,23 & 10,5,24: 5.) 7(x)-9 6.) 7(x)-9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-36
Thanks for testing proof but
PLEASE give me a break?
IT *cannot* be played like that. I tested playing like you did, (1 win or 1 loss) i got 8-9 losses out of 10. SO PLEASE, don't play like that with this one,... :/ now, i played the same spins, as i advised with a BR/Stoploss at 200u (1u bets) AND with a 30u wg (now that SHOULD be 60u (if reached a negative balance. OR ELSE if reached +100u, continue playing until all 3 steps lost, by playin this way we maximise profits and minimize losses)
I got
9/10 WINS playing *my way* (except with a lower wingoal, this time) flatbetting, it goes up and down, AND you must allow a negative balance before it reaches a new high, (as you can see in the charts).
calculating wins/losseswins
+30
+30
+21
+33
+31
+32
+39
+30
+33
=279
losses
-200
Total= +79u