Hi to all Members,
At present I am looking for those members who fully understand the 4Selecta system
to provide helpful comments on the new Profit Selecta system. I will email the details
of the system and the following are early results:
Spielbank February 2006
[table=,]
Date,Units
1.02,+28
2.02,+99
3.02,-24
4.02,+14
5.02,+98
6.02,-28
7.02,+46
8.02,+38
9.02,+43
10.02,-34
11.02,+72
12.02,-63
13.02,+66
14.02,-3
15.02,+99
16.02,-32
17.02,+99
18.02,+57
19.02,+101
20.02,-14
21.02,-21
22.02,-58
23.02,-48
24.02,+191
25.02,-67
26.02,-5
27.02,+87
28.02,-4
,----
,+1138
,-401
,----
,+737
[/table]
Many Thanks
Richard
This system as I can understand it must be on inside numbers...correct?
Because these profits in a session can t be done with outside betting
Quote from: Jordan on Nov 01, 12:34 PM 2010
This system as I can understand it must be on inside numbers...correct?
Because these profits in a session can t be done with outside betting
Correct :thumbsup:
Quote from: Richard on Nov 01, 03:32 PM 2010
Correct :thumbsup:
Congrats Richard, that's where "it" is :)
Richard
As you know, I am familiar with the 4Selecta. I will be happy to help in any way I can--with the following caveat: To keep peace in the family I must limit my roulette studies. Winter is good for me--no yard work or leaves or projects.
Let me know. TwoCatSam@cox.net
sm
Hi Sam,
I am grateful for your help and will email the system to you.
It's at an early stage of development, so any suggestions, improvements etc,
will be very welcome.
If it turns out to be a viable system I can then give it wider circulation.
Kind Regards
Richard
i have pm'ed you!
I am grateful to those members who are currently looking at the Profit Selecta system.
I particularly wanted members who fully understood the 4Selecta system to view this new
system.
My observations so far is that the tests I did for Spielbank February 2006 were very
encouraging. However January 2006 could well be a different story. I have got half way
through the month and there are a number of losses. I will have a better idea when I have
completed tests for this month.
In many ways this could be a mechanical system and such systems are notoriously
difficult in that losses have to be contained in some way. What I mean by that is the losses
have to be as low as possible in a session. Successful systems rely on human intervention
to take whatever action is necessary especially when it is obvious a session is lost.
A mechanical system will need a component that will end a possible losing session or
one where it is unlikely to make a profit, as soon as possible.
The trick then is to have a number of very profitable sessions interspersed with a small
number of low losses and then the inevitable series of losses many should be low and
some wins and come out of the "dark tunnel of losses" into the "bright sunshine" of
a number of very profitable sessions again.
Richard
I would be grateful to those members who are currently looking at the system
to email me with any queries and just show any results here at this stage.
Many Thanks
Richard
Dear Richard,
you can mail me that system. I would try to point out strengths and weaknesses of it.
Quote from: albalaha on Nov 05, 02:34 PM 2010
Dear Richard,
you can mail me that system. I would try to point out strengths and weaknesses of it.
I am grateful for your offer of help, but I have sufficient members here and on my
forum at present and as I mentioned previously, I requested those members who
already fully understand the 4Selecta system.
It's Ok. I thought I can help you. Enjoy,
As there has been little response to this system, I have decided to shelve it until
next year.
I am however looking at an improvement to 4Selecta and if it appears to be a sound
proposition, I will most probably explain it on the website in the near future.
I can still help you in providing suitable tweaks and progressions if this system has a winning approach.