Hi guys!
A friend of my, Malcop, told me about this looking good and a lot promising system.
Having some spare time I read the book and with help of Malcop designed a spreadsheet that is doing most of the hard work for me.
I did some testing as well.
If you find that my spreadsheet is not working as it should, please let me know.
Best regards!
All testing has been done on EuroGrand Online Casino - live feed
Session 1
2010-11-03 00:30
| Spins played: | 6 |
| Profit: | 6 |
| Total spins played: | 6 |
| Total profit: | 6 |
| Avg profit per spin: | 1 |
Session 2
2010-11-03 00:49
| Spins played: | 15 |
| Profit: | -12 |
| Total spins played: | 21 |
| Total profit: | -6 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,29 |
Session 3
2010-11-03 01:10
| Spins played: | 13 |
| Profit: | -10 |
| Total spins played: | 34 |
| Total profit: | -16 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,47 |
Session 4
2010-11-03 01:29
| Spins played: | 8 |
| Profit: | -14 |
| Total spins played: | 42 |
| Total profit: | -30 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,71 |
Session 5
2010-11-03 10:13
| Spins played: | 17 |
| Profit: | -14 |
| Total spins played: | 59 |
| Total profit: | -44 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,75 |
Session 6
2010-11-03 10:26
| Spins played: | 13 |
| Profit: | 5 |
| Total spins played: | 72 |
| Total profit: | -39 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,54 |
Session 7
2010-11-03 10:41
| Spins played: | 3 |
| Profit: | 3 |
| Total spins played: | 75 |
| Total profit: | -36 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,48 |
Session 8
2010-11-03 10:45
| Spins played: | 6 |
| Profit: | 9 |
| Total spins played: | 81 |
| Total profit: | -27 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,33 |
Session 9
2010-11-03 11:06
| Spins played: | 23 |
| Profit: | -2 |
| Total spins played: | 104 |
| Total profit: | -29 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,28 |
Session 10
2010-11-03 11:23
| Spins played: | 13 |
| Profit: | 11 |
| Total spins played: | 117 |
| Total profit: | -18 |
| Avg profit per spin: | -0,15 |
Hi All,
Thanks to trylobit for creating that great spreadsheet.
I don't know what to say we are using the same spreadsheet, but over the last 10 sessions played I have +38 units.
Like I said don't know what to say, the more people that can test/play this system the sooner we will know if this system can make a long term profit.
Thanks
malcop
Malcop, I think it is important say that you have been playing RNG Real Money so far.
Quote from: trylobit link=topic=2125. msg19462#msg19462 date=1288791645
Hi guys!
A friend of my, Malcop, told me about this looking good and a lot promising system.
Having some spare time I read the book and with help of Malcop designed a spreadsheet that is doing most of the hard work for me.
I did some testing as well.
If you find that my spreadsheet is not working as it should, please let me know.
Best regards!
Hi Trylobit,
I've tried to download the spreadsheet several times, but I'm getting the following message: File error: data may have been lost.
Can you give some advice what to do? (I have Excel 2003)
Thanks
Robert
Quote from: trylobit on Nov 03, 10:38 AM 2010
Malcop, I think it is important say that you have been playing RNG Real Money so far.
I know but as I said to you I also played 4 live sessions this morning on William Hill and eded +9
Hi Guys
What system are you reffering to, whats the spreadsheet set to look for? is it that DNA pdf that people have mentioned lately? The DNA of roulette
may I know the legends to the shortforms? what does NSO / EV / CIH / SV / Invert / CS means?
Hi All,
This thread is referring to the DNA of Roulette system, please, please, please do not use this spreadsheet until you have at least tried to familiarise yourself with this system not to do so would be a mistake!
The spread sheet is a very good way of learning learning this system, so if nothing else treat it as a learning tool.
I have attached the manual for those that do not have the updated manual.
Thanks
malcop
Oh so it was this DNA i thought it was donny's millionaire version=/ Will do some testing thanks!
I program and am having trouble understanding the fundamentals, is nobody going to give us a shortened version, if this happens do that, we will get more testers if everybody understands it!
Quote from: superman on Nov 03, 02:18 PM 2010
I program and am having trouble understanding the fundamentals, is nobody going to give us a shortened version, if this happens do that, we will get more testers if everybody understands it!
Hi superman,
I have been very busy but I have offered to help anyone learn this system I can get anyone up and rounding with this system in 30-60 minutes.
All you have to do is contact me on skype1960 so we can arrange a time.
Can't be fairer than that.
Thanks
malcop
Hi all!
There was an update that is suppose to bring more profit. I will modify the spreadsheet tonight and start a new treat.
Guys: this is not a dummy spreadsheet. Read the manual for the system, learn it and then use the spreadsheet.
About that strange message about data loss try download it with a different web browser.
Best regards.
@ malcop
thanks for the offer of skype but I use satelite internet and VOIP is not good, I would spend most of the time deciphering your words
I think I can sum up how this bet works, correct me if I am wrong please
We are working only with the last 3 results, they need checking twice
1st check
IF the last result is the same as the one before it, score = +
IF the last result is NOT the same as the one before it, score = -
we now have SCORE ( a "+" OR a "-") the PDF calls it the PIVOT SIGN
IF score = +
THEN check the 3rd result back to get score 2
IF score2 = +
bet 2 chips on same as last result, single doz/col bet
IF score2 = -
bet 1 chip on the other 2 that are NOT the last dozen/column, dual doz/col bet
Is that correct? if it is then I have some results for playtech rng, I bolted the above method into an old dozens tool I had which also bet on 2 or 1 at a time, I haven't added columns to it yet, if the above is correct then I will add columns to the bot and give you some more results, real money mode of course. I don't actually place bets in real mode when testing, I just log the data which is exactly the same.
EDIT: forgot to mention, I have used progression just because it was already in the script in the bot, the usual 1,3,9,27 etc for dual bets and x2 martingale on the singles, you can see from the file how many times progression kicked in, any questions ask.
Quote from: superman on Nov 05, 04:06 PM 2010
@ malcop
thanks for the offer of Skype but I use satelite internet and VOIP is not good, I would spend most of the time deciphering your words
I think I can sum up how this bet works, correct me if I am wrong please
We are working only with the last 3 results, they need checking twice
1st check
IF the last result is the same as the one before it, score = +
IF the last result is NOT the same as the one before it, score = -
we now have SCORE ( a "+" OR a "-") the PDF calls it the PIVOT SIGN
IF score = +
THEN check the 3rd result back to get score 2
IF score2 = +
bet 2 chips on same as last result, single doz/col bet
IF score2 = -
bet 1 chip on the other 2 that are NOT the last dozen/column, dual doz/col bet
Is that correct? if it is then I have some results for playtech rng, I bolted the above method into an old dozens tool I had which also bet on 2 or 1 at a time, I haven't added columns to it yet, if the above is correct then I will add columns to the bot and give you some more results, real money mode of course. I don't actually place bets in real mode when testing, I just log the data which is exactly the same.
EDIT: forgot to mention, I have used progression just because it was already in the script in the bot, the usual 1,3,9,27 etc for dual bets and x2 martingale on the singles, you can see from the file how many times progression kicked in, any questions ask.
If Malcop basically agrees with this then we finally have a simplified step flow.
Well done! And thank you for posting this.
Quote from: superman on Nov 05, 04:06 PM 2010
@ malcop
thanks for the offer of Skype but I use satelite internet and VOIP is not good, I would spend most of the time deciphering your words
I think I can sum up how this bet works, correct me if I am wrong please
We are working only with the last 3 results, they need checking twice
1st check
IF the last result is the same as the one before it, score = +
IF the last result is NOT the same as the one before it, score = -
we now have SCORE ( a "+" OR a "-") the PDF calls it the PIVOT SIGN
IF score = +
THEN check the 3rd result back to get score 2
IF score2 = +
bet 2 chips on same as last result, single doz/col bet
IF score2 = -
bet 1 chip on the other 2 that are NOT the last dozen/column, dual doz/col bet
Is that correct? if it is then I have some results for playtech rng, I bolted the above method into an old dozens tool I had which also bet on 2 or 1 at a time, I haven't added columns to it yet, if the above is correct then I will add columns to the bot and give you some more results, real money mode of course. I don't actually place bets in real mode when testing, I just log the data which is exactly the same.
EDIT: forgot to mention, I have used progression just because it was already in the script in the bot, the usual 1,3,9,27 etc for dual bets and x2 martingale on the singles, you can see from the file how many times progression kicked in, any questions ask.
Hi superman,
Slight correction,
First of all you look at the last spin to see if it was a + or -
If it was a + then you go back two spins including the last spin to find the spin sign
if it was a - then you go back three spins including the last spin to find the spin sign
now if you have a + sign you are betting for a repeat of the last outcome, that means you place two chips on the dozen that came out last.
If you have - sign you are betting for opposite to last so you place 1 chip on the two dozens that did not come out last.
So in a nutshell you are either betting same or opposite to last depending on what sign you have.
If you now go through pages 8, 9 and 10 a few times it will become automatic working out where you will be placing you bets
Thanks
malcop
Needless to say you do the same as above for columns
Hello again
This system has been around for a few years It's the old Donny's millionaire version. Forget it I have talked to him about it.
Cheers
Icman1313
Have even you looked at the manual, the only similarity is that it used dozens and columns that is it.
I/we know their are other systems out their that bet the dozens/columns at the same time we all know that.
Prove to us all that this is the same as Donny Millionaire word for word.
If I'm wrong then I will Apologise!
I/We are waiting!
Thanks
malcop
Quote from: iceman1313 on Nov 06, 03:06 AM 2010
Hello again
This system has been around for a few years It's the old Donny's millionaire version. Forget it I have talked to him about it.
Cheers
Iceman1313,
As an update I have a copy of Donny's millionaire's DNA (Divine Number Algorithm)
The only thing similarity is both systems use DNA in the system title and that is where it ends, if you have both systems and checked you would know that.
Thanks
malcop
Quote from: iceman1313 on Nov 06, 03:06 AM 2010
Hello again
This system has been around for a few years It's the old Donny's millionaire version. Forget it I have talked to him about it.
Cheers
May I suggest, iceman1313, that to prevent footinthemouthitis in future you actually read stuff carefully before posting on this forum?In that way you will clearly demonstrate whether or not you know what you are talking about.
Please note the following:
1 The DNA system we are testing is NOTHING TO DO AT ALL with the Donny Millionaire version.
2 The letters DNA is the only common factor!
3 They are both TOTALLY DIFFERENT documents. The content is different. The methods are different. The writing styles are different. Everything is different.
Unlike you, I have carefully read both before writing this post.