Equilibrium is the condition of a system in which competing influences are balanced.
I just want to test for fun about this as perfect balance distribution with every event having one equal show is so rare :twisted:
In every cycel you have a distribution - a dice with six sides wich have one show itch during six attempts is around 98% of probability not to happen - or i even assume is higher.
Nothing is due to happen but we all know imbalance is allways present.
If we take a look at 8 groups of three the imbalcance during 300 trails is clear and present.
Here below is one cycel.
1 stand for R and 2 for B.
2 1 2 212
2 1 2
1 2 1 121
1 2 2 122
1 1 1 111
1 1 2 112
2 2 2 222
1 1 2
2 1 1 211
1 1 2
2 1 1
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
2 2 2
2 1 1
1 2 1
1 1 1
2 2 1 221
Other ways is to use only four formations and no colours like R/B and one cycel would be.
xox
xxo
oxx
xxx
Exampel...
2 1 2 xox
2 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2 xoo
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 2 oox
Waves would be three new events out of four with out any repeat if we would isolate it into two bets.
Exampel = WWLLWWWLLWWWLWLWLLWWLLWWLWLWWLWLLWLWLWWWLWW
That is 300 trails with a very even distribution - but nothing is due to happen.
At least some one use a dice with four sides and a wave or capturing repeats wich appers when there is imbalance wich is constant present.
2 1 2 xox
2 1 2 xox W
1 2 1 xox
1 2 2 xoo
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 2 xxo
2 2 2 xxx W
1 1 2 xxo
2 1 1 xoo
1 1 2 xxo
2 1 1 xoo L
1 2 1 xox L
1 2 2 xoo
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 2 xxx
2 1 1 xoo
1 2 1 xox W
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo
1 1 1 xxx W
2 1 1 xoo
1 1 1 xxx
1 2 2 xoo L
2 1 2 xox L
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 2 xxo W
1 1 2 xxo
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo
2 1 2 xox
1 2 1 xox
2 1 1 xoo W
1 1 2 xxo
2 2 2 xxx
2 2 1 xxo W
1 2 2 xoo
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 1 xox L
1 2 1 xox W
1 2 1 xox
1 1 2 xxo L
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 2 xoo L
2 1 2 xox L
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 1 xxx W
2 1 1 xoo
2 1 1 xoo
1 2 2 xoo W
1 2 1 xox
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 2 xoo
2 2 2 xxx L
2 2 1 xxo L
1 2 1 xox
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 1 xxo
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo W
2 1 2 xox
1 1 1 xxx
1 2 1 xox L
1 1 1 xxx W
2 2 2 xxx
2 1 1 xoo L
1 2 2 xoo W
2 2 2 xxx
2 2 2 xxx W
2 1 2 xox
2 1 2 xox
1 1 1 xxx L
1 2 1 xox W
1 2 2 xoo
1 1 1 xxx L
2 1 2 xox L
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo W
2 1 1 xoo
1 1 2 xxo
2 1 2 xox L
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 2 xxx
1 2 1 xox L
1 1 1 xxx W
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 2 xxo W
2 1 1 oxx
1 2 2 oxx
2 1 1 xoo W
1 2 1 xox
2 2 1 xxo
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 1 xox L
1 1 2 xxo W
2 1 2 xox
1 2 2 xoo W
1 2 1 xox
1 2 2 xoo
2 2 2 xxx
I will run one simulation and using a fibo progression in four to five levels.
It would worka as a step-letter where you increase your bets to recover the two last lost bets and at any level above the first one is to gain +1 or break even and move down to first level again - this way you create a delay and can play for a long period of time before it fails or tank.
Note.
I know it will fail and the house edge will take it all down to zero and beyound - i only do this as i enjoy it to be fun.
Quote from: ego on Nov 17, 04:02 AM 2010
I will run one simulation and using a fibo progression in four to five levels.
Looking forward to seeing your results :)
Thanks for participating of the forum :thumbsup:
Quote from: VLS on Nov 18, 12:55 AM 2010
Looking forward to seeing your results :)
Thanks for participating of the forum :thumbsup:
The simulation works great - 1 units itch visit with no worrys - I assume if some one would like dinner or two drinks for free they could use this as its not so risky.
If you have a dice with four sides how many times in the row for itch cycel will it show 3 out of four sides up front - I have no clue hehehe
One other way is to wait until two groups of three formations goes to sleep and 6 sides of a dice with 8 sides had a show and play six times in a row 1 1 3 4 7 11.
If 121 and 112 is the sleeping ones you just play First 2 if 1 then no bet then if 2 then 2 and if it was 1 then 1 wich is a total of two bets against does two formations.
Different cominations give different canceleation.
Cheers
[reveal]PPP xxx
PPP xxx w 1
BPP xoo l -1
PPB xxo w 1
BPP xoo l -1
PPP xxx l -1
BPP xoo w 3
PBP xox w 1
PPP xxx l -1
BPP xoo l -1
PPP xxx w 3
BPP xoo l -1
PPP xxx w 1
BPP xoo l -1
BPB xox l -1
PPB xxo l -3
BPB xox w 4
BPP xoo w 3
BBB xxx l -1
5
[reveal]xxx
x0x l -1
xx0 l -1 -2
xx0 w 3 1
xx0 w 1 2
xxx w 1 3
xx0 w 1 4
x00 l -1 -3
xxx l -1 -2
x0x l -3 -5
xx0 l -4 -9
x00 l -7 -16
xx0 w 11 -5
xx0 w 7 2
x00 l -4 -2
x00 w 7 5
x0x w 1 6
xxx l -1 5
xox w 1 6[/reveal]
;)
or even waiting for the cycle to end
[reveal]
PPP xxx
PPP xxx w
BPP xoo
PPB xxo
BPP xoo
PPP xxx
BPP xoo
PBP xox c
PPP xxx
BPP xoo l
PPP xxx w
BPP xoo w
PPP xxx
BPP xoo
BPB xox
PPB xxo c
BPB xox
BPP xoo w
BBB xxx [/reveal]
after 2 losses why do not play against 4th pattern to appear?
???
Here are 2 sessions of 100 "mini-games" each -300 spins each session
played after LL
regression 7-3-1 :stop after any break in decision (LL or LW) then restart after LL again.
numbers are provided from random.org
so far the results are incredible. at least comparable with the use of a fibonacci progression 1-2-3-5-8-13...
==================================
I find strange that no one digs more into this.
this is a step ahead playing EC bets....
O0
Quote from: ego on Nov 17, 03:58 AM 2010
Waves would be three new events out of four with out any repeat if we would isolate it into two bets.
example = WWLLWWWLLWWWLWLWLLWWLLWWLWLWWLWLLWLWLWWWLWW
That is 300 trails with a very even distribution - but nothing is due to happen.
At least some one use a dice with four sides and a wave or capturing repeats wich appers when there is imbalance wich is constant present.
[reveal]
2 1 2 xox
2 1 2 xox W
1 2 1 xox
1 2 2 xoo
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 2 xxo
2 2 2 xxx W
1 1 2 xxo
2 1 1 xoo
1 1 2 xxo
2 1 1 xoo L
1 2 1 xox L
1 2 2 xoo
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 2 xxx
2 1 1 xoo
1 2 1 xox W
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo
1 1 1 xxx W
2 1 1 xoo
1 1 1 xxx
1 2 2 xoo L
2 1 2 xox L
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 2 xxo W
1 1 2 xxo
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo
2 1 2 xox
1 2 1 xox
2 1 1 xoo W
1 1 2 xxo
2 2 2 xxx
2 2 1 xxo W
1 2 2 xoo
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 1 xox L
1 2 1 xox W
1 2 1 xox
1 1 2 xxo L
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 2 xoo L
2 1 2 xox L
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 1 xxx W
2 1 1 xoo
2 1 1 xoo
1 2 2 xoo W
1 2 1 xox
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 2 xoo
2 2 2 xxx L
2 2 1 xxo L
1 2 1 xox
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 1 xxo
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo W
2 1 2 xox
1 1 1 xxx
1 2 1 xox L
1 1 1 xxx W
2 2 2 xxx
2 1 1 xoo L
1 2 2 xoo W
2 2 2 xxx
2 2 2 xxx W
2 1 2 xox
2 1 2 xox
1 1 1 xxx L
1 2 1 xox W
1 2 2 xoo
1 1 1 xxx L
2 1 2 xox L
1 1 1 xxx
2 2 1 xxo W
2 1 1 xoo
1 1 2 xxo
2 1 2 xox L
1 2 1 xox W
2 2 2 xxx
1 2 1 xox L
1 1 1 xxx W
1 1 1 xxx
1 1 2 xxo W
2 1 1 oxx
1 2 2 oxx
2 1 1 xoo W
1 2 1 xox
2 2 1 xxo
2 2 1 xxo
1 2 1 xox L
1 1 2 xxo W
2 1 2 xox
1 2 2 xoo W
1 2 1 xox
1 2 2 xoo
2 2 2 xxx
[/reveal]
the above session would have resulted in a profit of +47units if played with regression 7-3-1
:D