#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => General Discussion => Topic started by: TwoCatSam on Jun 07, 04:47 PM 2010

Title: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: TwoCatSam on Jun 07, 04:47 PM 2010
You might want to take a few minutes of your busy life to watch this.  I spent two hours on line playing and another cutting and splicing so you won't have to wait long.

First, Dublin is just another wheel amongst thousands.  These films are edited, but not faked.  I just cut the boring parts out; the whole film is there as well as many others.  Do not think this is fake; it is not.

I developed this method of play while doing a test for Ronjo in 2007.  I have played it extensively at CasinoWebCam, Vegas Red and Las Vegas Live and now I'm starting at Dublin.  It has worked fine for all the years I've tested/played it.  I have also played it live at several casinos.  I can't say it will work tomorrow; no one can.

This method is flat-betting only, although you will see #10 placed from time to time.  These are "double-advantage" numbers and get bet twice.  

To my knowledge, I am the only person who actually posts videos showing what I can do.  Some--many, in fact--merely boast and show no proof.

To those who yell "luck", I ask you to get as lucky and post as good a video!  You've talked your talk now walk your walk.

Double-click on the carpet for full screen; esc to go back.  I know you guys are impatient so here are the relevant times:  10 seconds; 5 min 16 sec; and 7 min 30 seconds. 



Sam

link:://:.motionbox.com/videos/a499deb61414e1c12c (link:://:.motionbox.com/videos/a499deb61414e1c12c)

Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: Wally Gator on Jun 07, 07:59 PM 2010
Hey Sam,

Great to see you here.   You've been one of the most upfront and honest guys I've ever met on the web.   Thanks again for sharing.

Did the video's have sound?  Didn't work for me.   Can you further share the strategy?

Best, Wally
Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: TwoCatSam on Jun 07, 08:02 PM 2010
These videos are silent.

Thanks for the kind words.

Sam
Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: esoito on Jun 08, 01:21 AM 2010
Well done, Sam.

VERY impressive.

I won't be the one crass enough to ask how you do it. . . but it won't stop me from thinking about it  ;)
Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: hamsup_sotong on Jun 08, 12:43 PM 2010
kudos samster

your posts are always apprieciated

cheers
hamsup
Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: Blood Angel on Jun 08, 03:11 PM 2010
Hi Sam
Very interesting. . . . . as always  ;)
Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: ScoobyDoo on Jun 08, 05:43 PM 2010
Hi Samster,

I'm happy you are sharing with the forum. I have one question though. Are you intending to show exactly how your method works step-by -step in further posts or were you just intending to show us that you have a winning method?

If your intention is to show us exactly how it works, can you give us an idea of when this will occur?

Thanks,
Scooby Doo
Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrevelant"!
Post by: Wally Gator on Jun 08, 07:59 PM 2010
Sam,

If I remember correct about the Ronjo strategy there were many methods.   The best being sector, I think.   I don't want to intrude or share anything you don't want to share.   Lanky and I had many long conversations about several of Ronjo's strategies.   They were all awesome.   If you'd like to go further, it's up to you.

The one thing I can repeat openly is that you are a straight shooter and will always tell the real deal.   As it should be.

Hope all is well with you.

Gator
Title: Re: Maybe this post won't be "irrelevant"!
Post by: esoito on Jun 09, 07:26 PM 2010
Let's apply probability to this interesting post. . .

Is it probable Sam is simply boasting and wanting to impress?  [NO.  Based on his previous posts he's NOT that sort of person. ]

Is it probable he's wanting to establish his credibility for a particular reason? [YES -- highly probable. ]

Is it probable the 'particular reason' is that he's likely to explain his method, or part of his method? [YES -- highly probable.  Otherwise why bother going to all the trouble with making the video, if it's not simply to impress?]

Is it probable my comments are all wrong?  [50/50  ;D  ]