So, i have found this on the web: link:s://web.archive.org/web/20120813230436/link:://:.freewebs.com/turbogenius/raindropscomments.htm
Very interesting!
Can someone code this into rx? But without the progression.
:thumbsup:
So I have been testing a different variation of this for about a year and it always seems to do well on RS. But I have no coding skills. I have yet to try it at the casino but it always seems to do well on RS. I just had +316 units in 130 spins. I know Ben has tested this theory, not sure if he still is. You just add +18 on the low number and -18 on the high numbers. Play the 2 numbers as they each come out.
1/19
2/20
3/21
4/22
5/23
6/24
7/25
8/26
9/27
10/28
11/29
12/30
13/31
14/32
15/33
16/34
17/35
18/36
0/00
Notice each set is the same color and in the same column. Also they are in the same position of the table in the high/low position. I also have wondered if this is what Vaddi meant by "mirror" number and partner number. Is that what balance is? I don't know.
Interesting..
" ...above we assumed that all 3 dozens wouldn't have the same pattern of sleepers.. and they
don't (and probably almost never will).."
Somebody know the value of that probability the Author referred about?
Which is the probability to have a first win in the next cycle ?
Thanks
Quote from: Gitano on Mar 12, 12:54 PM 2019
Interesting..
" ...above we assumed that all 3 dozens wouldn't have the same pattern of sleepers.. and they
don't (and probably almost never will).."
Somebody know the value of that probability the Author referred about?
Which is the probability to have a first win in the next cycle ?
Thanks
That would be nice to know...
Hey. Why did turbo face go into detail about the locations of the sleepers if he just bet all the sleepers for 37 spins.
Quote from: Irish88 on Mar 12, 06:07 AM 2019
So I have been testing a different variation of this for about a year and it always seems to do well on RS. But I have no coding skills. I have yet to try it at the casino but it always seems to do well on RS. I just had +316 units in 130 spins. I know Ben has tested this theory, not sure if he still is. You just add +18 on the low number and -18 on the high numbers. Play the 2 numbers as they each come out.
1/19
2/20
3/21
4/22
5/23
6/24
7/25
8/26
9/27
10/28
11/29
12/30
13/31
14/32
15/33
16/34
17/35
18/36
0/00
Notice each set is the same color and in the same column. Also they are in the same position of the table in the high/low position. I also have wondered if this is what Vaddi meant by "mirror" number and partner number. Is that what balance is? I don't know.
The only way to use this in Turbo’s raindrops idea is go through the full cycle 1st...any unique or repeat that hasn’t hit its mirror image should be bet on next cycle..stop if in profit..and maybe for the daring do the same next cycle from previous cycle you just been through
Quote from: Gitano on Mar 12, 12:54 PM 2019" ...above we assumed that all 3 dozens wouldn't have the same pattern of sleepers.. and they
don't (and probably almost never will).."
Fun[] := Module[{},
th = RandomInteger[{1, 36}, 36];
cr = Complement[Range[36], Union[th]];
d1 = Cases[cr, _?( # <= 12 &)];
d2 = Cases[cr, _?(13 <= # && # <= 24 &)];
d3 = Cases[cr, _?( # >= 25 &)];
{SameQ[d1, d2 - 12], SameQ[d1, d3 - 24], SameQ[d2 - 12, d3 - 24]}]
Timing[erg = Table[Fun[], 10000000];
Tally[erg]]Quick test: No Zero, Cycles each 36 spins
Result:
{{{False, False, False}, 9987992},
{{False, False, True}, 4050}, ( 4050 pattern sleepers doz 2 = pattern sleepers doz 3 )
{{True, False, False}, 3961}, ( 3961 pattern sleepers doz 1 = pattern sleepers doz 2 )
{{False, True, False}, 3996}, ( 3996 pattern sleepers doz 1 = pattern sleepers doz 3 )
{{True, True, True},
1}}}
1 ( pattern sleepers doz 1 = pattern sleepers doz 2 = pattern sleepers doz 3)
SHORT: Once in 10.000.000 cycles each 36 spins you get the same sleepers pattern in dozen1,2,3
Quote from: Herby on Mar 14, 06:40 AM 2019SHORT: Once in 10.000.000 cycles each 36 spins you get the same sleepers pattern in dozen1,2,3
OHH MY!!
yeaaah, but how to make a working system out of this.
Use a loooooong progression and a huuuuuge bankroll.
I've never seen any of turbos methods use anything but classic fallacy. Since the "never lose" loophole on rs was fixed, he's nowhere to be seen. Ever wonder why?
Some people will believe anything.
What never lose rs loophole!
I knew it. U mean on the marty simulator or what?
The online games, with play money, that turbo used to proclaim him having the hg that never loses a session. Like parx, and rs. Read the turbo thread. I don't get why anyone would lie about it all. I mean is your life so sad that you need the attention?
Do u mean a loophole in the software of the rs martingale tester cus after i beat a million spins i emailed them that i "beat their tester" it never workes again after the email. (Was the next million unlicky if did they fix it) i then got a guy here to rx test it was 9k after 100k spins except he said the downswings where way too crazy to play. Then the excel test failed fully. Ita driving me nuts. So the rsimulator .info tester had a loophole?? Anyway it never replicates on real rapid wheel so i assume it was a fault ffs!
Yes rs had a loophole that enabled turbo to never lose a session. Since it was fixed, he's nowhere near top rank, and briefly had his sessions visible in which he was losing. He made them invisible now. Many of us did say he was full of shit. Another self professed messiah will come.
so, 1 in 10.00000000 something.
What if you wait till 1 of the sleepers hit, then place a bet on it with progression?
So you bet for a repeat in the sleeper section
Quote from: Herby on Mar 14, 06:40 AM 2019Quote from: Gitano on Mar 12, 02:54 PM 2019
" ...above we assumed that all 3 dozens wouldn't have the same pattern of sleepers.. and they
don't (and probably almost never will).."
We have to take care:
Once in 10.000.000 cycles,
exactly the same pattern.
One element more or less is counted as
not the same pattern.
I you consider partially overlapping sets the statistics will be very different.
PS.: You can make your own experiments on a Raspberry Pi, the Mathematica code you see above
Quote from: Herby on Mar 15, 05:23 AM 2019I you consider
Give me an "f" -> I
f you consider ...
Quote from: Steve on Mar 15, 04:13 AM 2019
Yes rs had a loophole that enabled turbo to never lose a session. Since it was fixed, he's nowhere near top rank, and briefly had his sessions visible in which he was losing. He made them invisible now. Many of us did say he was full of shit. Another self professed messiah will come.
Are you telling me that Turbo's system didn't work after all? Are you saying that the results were fake?(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2019/03/15/sourcecbd88.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/UXSPL)
I'm shocked!
No word of a lie.
Rs simulator made me think i also beat it .i beat their martingalr simulator for 1.000.000 spins with 18 sleeper system. I emailed them about it. When he didnt answer i called him many mean names. Much more happend than that.. lucky i never went in big $. In the real as i was skeptical.