Part One of my Dynamic Roulette Bet
I go through “patterns†by labeling each result as ol, el, oh, and eh. When the same result occurs, I treat it and the following results as a series until a mixed result occurs. When an opposite result occurs back-to-back, I treat this and the results that follow as a series of mixed results.
These are all clustered as a series of series results and mixed results. When I lose one bet, I reverse it by placing my bet on the exact opposite of where I would bet.
This is a 27 number bet.
Quote from: Mean on Oct 31, 06:23 AM 2020
Part One of my Dynamic Roulette Bet
I go through “patterns†by labeling each result as ol, el, oh, and eh. When the same result occurs, I treat it and the following results as a series until a mixed result occurs. When an opposite result occurs back-to-back, I treat this and the results that follow as a series of mixed results.
These are all clustered as a series of series results and mixed results. When I lose one bet, I reverse it by placing my bet on the exact opposite of where I would bet.
This is a 27 number bet.
Congratulations, my friend Mean, you are Reading Randomness. A 27 number bet does win 71% of the time. There are many clustered "patterns" that can be used including EC's.
Quote from: Mean on Oct 31, 06:23 AM 2020
Part One of my Dynamic Roulette Bet
I go through “patterns†by labeling each result as ol, el, oh, and eh. When the same result occurs, I treat it and the following results as a series until a mixed result occurs. When an opposite result occurs back-to-back, I treat this and the results that follow as a series of mixed results.
These are all clustered as a series of series results and mixed results. When I lose one bet, I reverse it by placing my bet on the exact opposite of where I would bet.
This is a 27 number bet.
Welcome to the system betting club. 👍
A Session Won
I won 4 units if you apply French Roulette rules to this session. Follow my line as that's where I bet; I switch sides for each loss. S means same or series. M means mix. For example, ol is a series of ol, el, and oh. A mix of ol is everything except ol, so el, oh, and eh.
This simulation is taken from Wizardofodds.com. I just started in the beginning of the 1 million spin simulation.
link:s://wizardofodds.com//games/roulette/simulation/
You could learn from me.
Reading Randomness "Combo Bets" is light years ahead of you.
You can use my practice software, for free, to practice and learn the value of your nifty idea.
So here are 100 spins in a row on all Red / Low numbers. You can see them in the bottom text box.
Just look what happened. It's a win streak. That's what one looks like.
-----------------------------------------
W | B R | O E | L H | 0 6 | P | S |
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 01 -- 02 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 02 -- 25 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 03 -- 16 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 04 -- 31 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 05 -- 18 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 06 -- 22 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 07 -- 27 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 08 -- 04 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 09 -- 22 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 10 -- 05 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 11 -- 21 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 12 -- 07 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 13 -- 04 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 14 -- 13 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 15 -- 08 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 16 -- 12 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 17 -- 23 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 18 -- 35 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 19 -- 36 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
|--------------------| X | X | X | -- 20 -- 37 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 21 -- 03 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 22 -- 27 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 23 -- 28 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 24 -- 15 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 25 -- 25 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 26 -- 23 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 27 -- 17 ( $ -135 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 28 -- 05 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 29 -- 36 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 30 -- 27 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 31 -- 30 ( $ -135 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 32 -- 14 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 33 -- 24 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 34 -- 34 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 35 -- 03 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 36 -- 32 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 37 -- 07 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 38 -- 08 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 39 -- 32 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 40 -- 03 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 41 -- 14 ( $ 315 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 42 -- 25 ( $ 270 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 43 -- 34 ( $ 225 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 44 -- 08 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 45 -- 10 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 46 -- 06 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 47 -- 12 ( $ 225 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 48 -- 05 ( $ 360 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 49 -- 14 ( $ 495 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 50 -- 33 ( $ 450 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 51 -- 19 ( $ 405 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 52 -- 06 ( $ 360 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 53 -- 01 ( $ 495 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 54 -- 07 ( $ 630 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 55 -- 16 ( $ 765 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 56 -- 02 ( $ 720 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 57 -- 18 ( $ 855 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 58 -- 19 ( $ 810 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 59 -- 01 ( $ 945 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 60 -- 13 ( $ 900 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 61 -- 11 ( $ 855 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 62 -- 24 ( $ 810 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 63 -- 16 ( $ 945 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 64 -- 22 ( $ 900 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 65 -- 12 ( $ 1035 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 66 -- 26 ( $ 990 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 67 -- 03 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 68 -- 09 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 69 -- 11 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 70 -- 20 ( $ 1170 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 71 -- 35 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 72 -- 31 ( $ 1080 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 73 -- 18 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 74 -- 21 ( $ 1170 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 75 -- 06 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 76 -- 10 ( $ 1080 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 77 -- 14 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 78 -- 05 ( $ 1350 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 79 -- 31 ( $ 1305 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 80 -- 08 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 81 -- 05 ( $ 1395 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 82 -- 35 ( $ 1350 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 83 -- 02 ( $ 1305 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 84 -- 31 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 85 -- 21 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 86 -- 08 ( $ 1170 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 87 -- 20 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 88 -- 16 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 89 -- 15 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 90 -- 18 ( $ 1350 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 91 -- 09 ( $ 1485 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 92 -- 27 ( $ 1440 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | | | -- 93 -- 09 ( $ 1575 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | | -- 94 -- 18 ( $ 1710 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 95 -- 15 ( $ 1665 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 96 -- 07 ( $ 1800 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | | -- 97 -- 29 ( $ 1755 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | | X | -- 98 -- 13 ( $ 1710 ) Red / Low
| X | X | X | X | X | | -- 99 -- 17 ( $ 1665 ) Red / Low
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- 100 -- 07 ( $ 1800 ) Red / Low
Bump.
This bet works beyond statistical probability for the wizards results (at least up to a certain point). I tried it on other spins, and of coarse it’s no better than random betting.
I also have a bet for baccarat with similar results. Of coarse you cannot profit off it, but it demonstrates something in baccarat that should happen a lot more often (just a simple sequence). It also passed on other random results I obtained. It doesn’t profit, but a certain sequence happens way less often than it should according to math.
Even if this roulette bet falls within the math, I challenge you to find a better bet with the same or similar (27 number) variance. I tried hundreds of combinations/methods and found none that could dent the house edge like this one (only with the wizard’s simulation)
I am not stupid. I know there is no reason for this, but it definitely seems beyond random chance.
Bump.
This bet works beyond statistical probability for the wizards results (at least up to a certain point). I tried it on other spins, and of coarse it’s no better than random betting.
I also have a bet for baccarat with similar results. Of coarse you cannot profit off it, but it demonstrates something in baccarat that should happen a lot more often (just a simple sequence). It also passed on other random results I obtained. It doesn’t profit, but a certain sequence happens way less often than it should according to math.
Even if this roulette bet falls within the math, I challenge you to find a better bet with the same or similar (27 number) variance. I tried hundreds of combinations/methods and found none that could dent the house edge like this one (only with the wizard’s simulation)
I am not stupid. I know there is no reason for this, but it definitely seems beyond random chance.
Quote from: Mean on Jan 01, 04:18 PM 2021
Bump.
This bet works beyond statistical probability for the wizards results (at least up to a certain point). I tried it on other spins, and of coarse it’s no better than random betting.
I also have a bet for baccarat with similar results. Of coarse you cannot profit off it, but it demonstrates something in baccarat that should happen a lot more often (just a simple sequence). It also passed on other random results I obtained. It doesn’t profit, but a certain sequence happens way less often than it should according to math.
Even if this roulette bet falls within the math, I challenge you to find a better bet with the same or similar (27 number) variance. I tried hundreds of combinations/methods and found none that could dent the house edge like this one (only with the wizard’s simulation)
I am not stupid. I know there is no reason for this, but it definitely seems beyond random chance.
I don't exactly understand how you bet. Could you please show a few examples with numbers when and what you bet?
I apologize already for not being the brightest light.
The thing is that 'the bet you switch to' ain't always performing diametrically opposite.
Or in other words the bet you switched the last time ain't necessarily the 'opposite performing' option!
The 'PERFORMANCES' of each type - those few or several - you have determined to include in the arsenal VARY, as variance keeps producings random different strings always consisting of differently placed numbers.
This ain't a roulette graph - biorythm, but proves the point.
(link:s://play-lh.googleusercontent.com/DnjbSfpAyCastUehamr345EHWimm8EagKVrEeg2eiOrhxJQdaADnB-RzpjPfMEVxdAg=w412-h220-rw)
i.e. azure & green line
So as of now I think that having a 'constant' bet sequence acting as a probe, & such bet sequence being like a parachute minimum type of betting or at least a sequence that with one non-hit pass produces not much & recoverable drawdown - it might be possible to almost always be betting the correct bet selection that is currently performing well, having an app that clearly displays the unified chart of balances produced by each 'static' bet selection.
I never searched for performances of sequences. Doing so is useless because it’s all random. I just change my bets after a loss. It all losses in the long run, so I guess the opposite would be to not bet.
Last year I spent three months developing a similar method, in the beginning it worked good but later it failed and ate my whole bankroll.
What went wrong & WHY?
How similar?
Quote from: thereddiamanthe on Jan 02, 10:46 AM 2021
The thing is that 'the bet you switch to' ain't always performing diametrically opposite.
Or in other words the bet you switched the last time ain't necessarily the 'opposite performing' option!
The 'PERFORMANCES' of each type - those few or several - you have determined to include in the arsenal VARY, as variance keeps producings random different strings always consisting of differently placed numbers.
This ain't a roulette graph - biorythm, but proves the point.
(link:s://play-lh.googleusercontent.com/DnjbSfpAyCastUehamr345EHWimm8EagKVrEeg2eiOrhxJQdaADnB-RzpjPfMEVxdAg=w412-h220-rw)
i.e. azure & green line
So as of now I think that having a 'constant' bet sequence acting as a probe, & such bet sequence being like a parachute minimum type of betting or at least a sequence that with one non-hit pass produces not much & recoverable drawdown - it might be possible to almost always be betting the correct bet selection that is currently performing well, having an app that clearly displays the unified chart of balances produced by each 'static' bet selection.
I'm sorry, but I just can't take you even remotely seriously. Why do you write such fluffy BS?
The point is you are unable to take me. Besides I wasn't addressing you..
I admire "thereddiamanthe" dedication to his own particular research and can attest that he might not have English as his primary language and so often what he wants to convey (in my opinion) is not what is interpreted. We must look beyond conversational patterns of speaking and get to the nitty gritty pieces of information. Of which he "thereddiamanthe" is a true researcher of. Even if it of a different trajectory than the one we are on.
What I agree with most about "thereddiamanthe's" research is that he is relentless. Yes he can be short but who cares We are no here to make nice, we are here to help each other get to profit.
No offense to you general but I just wanted to say my part about "thereddiamanthe"
I have followed you as well "general" and like your work.
sunburst
Where do we bet next?
Randomness goes in cycles. There are series of results, short and long that run in the player’s advantage, and there are series of results, short and long that run unfavorably for the player.
As Gizmo has said, “bet big when you are doing well.†This also aligns with CEH Ultimate Betting Strategy.
Quote from: Mean on Jan 07, 02:41 AM 2021As Gizmo has said, “bet big when you are doing well.†This also aligns with CEH Ultimate Betting Strategy.
I have never mentioned how difficult it can be for people to get off of a win streak when it has hiccups and starts to fade. All good patches have endings and do it in several ways. My suggestion it to step off fast and go back to small size bets.
This applies to almost all bet tactics. There are perfect patterns that look like they are ending but in fact they are performing perfectly. It just takes looking at the quality of ending streaks. You learn from all this and then discover that nobody can know how the next streak ends. But, there are more common style endings. If you get off quick then you save yourself for another battle with the bigs. You make money staying alive with the bigs.
Quote from: Sunburstsoon on Jan 03, 07:10 PM 2021I have followed you as well "general" and like your work.
Yeah he's fine, don't think so. He disrupts topics with the shaking head and only spouts look for a wobbly wheel.
To "General gormless"