Friends,
I present to you,
a finding of,
10000spins, which
transform into TRIPLETS.
of dozens.
This strategy
already STALE for the uninformed...
Newbies will scratching their heads,
Only old hand and old timer,
will understand what I say here.
So here's my finding...
123=dozen1,dz2,dz3.
We only concern only about
THREE ...UNIQUE triplets...
111.
222.
333.
Albeit The Zero.
There's only 27triplets of dz.
Thus,
THE UNIQUE 111,222,333,
only 3/27.
In my very short data of 10000,
Triplets of 111,222,333, appeared
accordingly to math expectation...
There only
3333rows of triplets.
10000SPINS/3=3333TRIPLETS.
The UNIQUE
111,222,333hit
355/3333rows
=10.65%,
Instead of 11.11%,
Caused by the pesky ZERO, that lurch between the TRIPLETS.
Freestanding unique triplets=282
single same dz triplet not followed by another same dz triplet.
111
xxx
111
Xxx
Streak of two=14.
111 followed by
111.
Streak of three=
One.
111
111
111.
You may look at your computer,
Seek data,out of millions spins to see
how many triplets
1)Stand alone freestanding.
Not followed by another unique triplets.
2)How many UNIQUE followed by another DIFFERENT unique.
3)How many UNIQUE followed by
SAME UNIQUE...in streaks of two, three, or more...
With those data, we can see anamoly not governed, by math, and that's a grail.....
I will tell how to bet, but we need more data we
to see if t he is anamoly persist in very huge data.
Please help by posting your findings...
1)Stand alone freestanding.
Not followed by another unique triplets.
eg.
111 unique
112 mixed
121 mixed
222 unique
122mixed
333 unique
132 mixed
2)How many UNIQUE followed by another DIFFERENT unique.
111 followed by
333 another unique .
121 mixed
222 followed by
111 different unique
333 different unique
3)How many UNIQUE followed by
SAME UNIQUE...in streaks of two, three, or more...
222 followed by
222
333
333
333
222
222
222
222
You also see this
111 followed by
111 same, then...
333 DIFFERENT UNIQUE
With those data, we can see anamoly not governed, by math, and that's a grail.....
Let's say,, 27triplets represented by 27makes of car's brands.
Let's say, in a town, has only 27brands of car marque, of same quantity in hundreds.
BMW, Merced,Audi, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, etc.
Then on the roadside, you see a BMW zoom past, then followed by a BMW ...
After minutes later, you see a BMW zoom past, do you think it will followed by another BMW, again?
Of course, there's possibilities, but again and again?
You see a BMW, then a Mercedes, then Honda...
Minutes later, a BMW zoom past, you think a Mercedes, and a Honda, will also pass? Again?
In math expectation,
Every triplet has same probability to appeared.....1/27.
But why
111,222,333,
Simply because it easy for brain to detect.
111
111
111
222
Are same to,
say,
112
223
112
331 etc
By our brain, see 111,222,333as more special to
than the 112,223,112,331.
It is more easy to eyes.
Hi Sweet(PA), long time....
So you do here a waiting/go against/ pattern game.
I say better results if go with hot/active groups, or events related with groups of numbers( doz, col, DS, or any...)
One event i use sometimes is the
*gap* between same group.Or can call it* distance* of repeat of the same group.
Ex:
Doz/Dist
3
1
3 /d2
2
2 /d1
1 /d4
2 /d2 and d3
3
2 /d2 and d4
3 /d2
3 /d1 and d3
1
1 /d1
3 /d3 and d4
2
1
2 /d2
3 /d4
2 /d2 and d4
2 /d1 and d3
3 /d3
1
3 /d2
1 /d2
Try few sessions, many times if any distance( from d1,d2,d3,d4) show once, tend to hit again. I attack one * distance * only for few spins.
Other event could be the movement from one dozen to other:
Mov 1
d1 to d2, d2 to d3, d3 to d1
Mov 2
d1 to d3, d2 to d1, d3 to d2
Mov 3
d1 to d1, d2 to d2, d3 to d3
Ex:
Doz/ Mov
2
1 /m2
2 /m1
3 /m1
3 /m3
1 /m1
3 /m2
1 /m1
3 /m2
2 /m2
2 /m3
3 /m1
1 /m1
1 /m3
1 /m3
3 /m2
2 /m2
1 /m2
3 /m2
1 /m1
2 /m1
2 /m3
1 /m2
3 /m2
3 /m3
Attack one movement for few spins.Never attack sleeper event, group...number...etc... , my personal opinion/ experience .
Hi Kattila,
Very happy to see you here,
Thank you so much for your ideas!
Actually I also research the movement strategy as yours.
Dz1,dz2=1move.
Dz1,dz2=2move.
From your post...
3 /m1
1 /m1
1 /m3 (should be move1?)
1 /m3
3 /m2
Thanks Kartika.
Kattila,
Using your ex as triplets.
Ex:
Doz/ Mov
2
1 /m2
2 /m1
3 /m1
3 /m3
1 /m1
3 /m2
1 /m1
3 /m2
2 /m2
2 /m3
3 /m1
1 /m1
1 /m3
1 /m3
3 /m2
2 /m2
1 /m2
3 /m2
1 /m1
2 /m1
2 /m3
1 /m2
3 /m2
3 /m3
Doz/ Mov
2
1 /m2,_2 /m1,_3 /m1
3 /m3_1 /m1,_3 /m2
1 /m1_3 /m2_2 /m2
2 /m3_3 /m1_1 /m1
1 /m3_1 /m3_3 /m2
2 /m2_1 /m2_3 /m2
1 /m1_2 /m1_2 /m3
1 /m2_3 /m2_3 /m3
How to bet using the m1m2m3???
1 ,_2 /m1, _3 /m1
3 ,_1 /m1, _3 /m2
1 ,_3 /m2 ,_2 /m2
2 ,_3 /m1 ,_1 /m1
1 ,_1 /m3 ,_3 /m2
2 ,_1 /m2 ,_3 /m2
1 ,_2 /m1, _2 /m3
1 ,_3 /m2 ,_3 /m3
It's not hg, but we bet that 2nd row triplet, won't repeat 1st row triplet's m1m2m3.
Dz X,m1,m1 (first row)
Dz y,m1,M2 (L)(Win)
Win because M2 didn't
repeat M1 above (first row)
Hi,
I use 3 movements ,see movements in my post, and bet one active mov.
If you want to use it as pattern/ 2 doz bet , go ahead, make some tests.
in my research, these particular triplets have a limit to appeared as a group.
(group one PERMUTATION)
123
231
312
(group two)
132
213
321
The Probabilities Limit.
Look at your data, you will see a repeat of those triplet.
123
123
321
321
213
213, as a not very RARE
occurrence.
but very rare to see
321
321
321
231
231
231
123
123
123...in 9spins.
And also,
Very Rare to see
(group one PERMUTATION)
123
231
312.
to hit in 9spins.
you may see
123
231
once in while,
in 100 so spins,
but hardly see
123
231
312
or permutation of these three triplets in 9spins.
xxx
Below, three triplets, you hardly see in 9spins.
Two triplets in a row, not rare, but three in rows, very rare.
(group two permutation)
132
213
321.
132
213 may see
321 very rare.
213
321 may see
132 very rare.
I have others groups, as a very rare to hit in 9 spins.
Credit goes to ATI:
, I've check the same thing on 100k live spins.
These are the stats for the 123 dozen pattern.
123 - 3397 times
123 1 - 1041 times
123 12 - 339 times
123 123 - 126 times
123 123 1 - 43 times
123 123 12 - 16 times
123 123 123 - 8 times
123 123 123 1 - 2 times
123 123 123 12 - 2 times
123 123 123 123 - 0 times
I would not wait ages for that patterns , then bet penny s, at least bet big if wait so long.
Some ideas of patterns, but not wait so long:
Two dozen ( or column bet)
Doz/col
1/3
2/2
2/2
3/1
2/2.....TRIGGER 1,2...on col
See on doz 1223( vertical), now on col we have for now 1,2...now bet against 2,3
Col/doz
3/1
2/2
2/1
1/3
3/3
1/2
2/2...trigger 2,2...
On col 2213, trigger on doz 2,2...bet against 1,3
_______________
Thanks Kattila for your informative post.
Here a riddle,
newbies will scratch their head and need to think very hard, for many years.
The people who knows the answer will keep their mouth tightly shut.
In a 100session.
1/3...of the sessions.
I will lose...
But ,
2/3 of the sessions.
I will win.
When I lose a session,
I lose net 100.
But when I win, a session...
I win net 200.
This mean, I lose one time =$100.
I win two time, =$200.
111
112
113
121
122
123
131
132
133
211
212
213
221
222
223
231
232
233
311
312
313
321
322
323
331
332
333
The best thing here is what Kat said about distances.. All other things were analyzed from Pri to it's core..
Hi Sweet, and thank you for all this roulette knowledge you share with us. But right now mine is not a criticism of your work, but an observation. In the roulette forums I have always found, and I repeat always, riddles, half-said sentences, etc. etc. on methods, studies, systems to make a profit with the game of roulette.
The first thing that comes to mind is: if someone has a method, and keeps it to himself, but tomorrow in heaven he will have his reward? Second question: but if someone has a method and tells others, does he no longer win at roulette? Third question: if someone does not want to tell others his method/strategy, why mention it/discuss it in a public forum? Maybe to say I have it and you don't?
And if someone objects to me saying: it took me many years to study it etc etc and then I answer him: well then keep it for yourself, don't say anything and let others find it by themselves.
It may seem strange but, from my point of view, saying beginners will discover it many years ago, is like a blow, and not a help. Also because it is true that among those beginners there are those who do not want to study, but maybe there are also those who "cannot" understand much maybe about statistics or mathematics, something that I think your last post includes...
Ultimately I am only reclaiming the spirit of the forums, sharing, and not that of quiz riddles with a final prize.
Believe me I am not a beginner, and excuse the outburst, but I am just tired of riddles, the ones we have been dragging behind us for years and who knows maybe one day the forum will close and we will not even see the solution.
good continuation.
thanks gentlemen, for your post.
Just basic understanding...
for easy EYES and understanding, just concentrate on triplets that START with dz1.
And for a moment, (for understanding sake),
we just temporarily,
"preoccupied",
with 1xx ,(when dz1 hit) and see, how it, become or not become "111". ..
in long term.
Thus, when,
a "Dozen-1" hit...
in the next TWO spins,
it may become...
111
112
113
121
122
123
131
132
133
thus we see, 111, like others, will hit, in 1/9.
So not matter how you slice, juggle, shake, and whatever, bet technique,
(apart from ZERO, you will hit with equilibrium).
If you do a long list of thousand of triplets,
with real data, you will see 111, will hit accordingly to math expectation...
Now we look at, when the dz1 hit, as the first , of a triplet.
1xx
1xx
1xx...
if dz1, hit 6 or 9 times in streak,
you see
111
111(6hit)
111.(9hit)
you may see,
a few time,
xxx(any triplet)
111
111(six hit)
2xx
111( hit again)
with a different triplet in between...
But you rarely see
111
2xx
111
3xx
2xx
111(three 111 in row, when dz1 hit as first dz of a triplet...)
so, if you, just lookout, at dz1, as the first hit, of three...
111, will not goes on forever.
1 2 3 bull s...
Leoncino,
I understand your point of wiew, but you must understand that on forums you can t have full info about ...lets say a best system that someone have. None will give such info( forums or on private) . Maybe a second/third best method and probably for some cash.
I tried to help some for free, maybe they not happy with the result because if see a bad run they scare , any...any system have bad runs, but it s about to win more than lose.
I did sell in the past good info to only few, also i give to some coder to test ( hello H...y) gone/disapeard...at last could send the results no matter if are bad or good ones.
You are right about the half posted info or systems , hints, riddles, and so...one if post then should post full system, betselection, MM plan...etc...
Try the gaps/ distances betselection , can use it for any group of numbers, test if wish, and can use Hermes...LW strategy to avoid some ( not all) bad runs. I advice ( no matter what betselection) go with the trend, not against.
Sweet , sorry for the interruptions, and maybe you can elaborate a little more about when, what to bet, what progressions to use.
Like it, nottopharmer, an impersonator must be JoeCroupier, but I reckon he's right.
Interceptor, useless fcuker
Thanks gentlemen and Kattila,for your opinions...
Kattila
&
Leoncino,
with due respect.
Try this and play with FUN MONEY, or real data, for a few hundred times ,
play "NON STOP",
bet 9spins,
win or lose, restart immediately.
(ignore ZERO, as if it not exist, deal with it later, #insurance.)
and tell us what you found.
no need to look at previous result, just bet, when you sit down,
for meanwhile, no need to think about progression, we just want to see how many sessions lose, and won, and then think how to adjust the betselection and progression...later.
Just try and see...
The Strategy.
bet double dozens, with 1u each...dozen.
bet dz2&dz3,
(for 3spins.)
bet dz1&dz3
(for 3spins)
bet dz1&dz2
(for 3spins)
no need to headache about the win lose unit or progression...
Just want to see,
"how many sessions you lose and how many sessions, you win."
Thanks.
waiting for your replies.
I had play 10000spins and not lose a session, maybe, my data too small, or some disparency.
Nevertheless, maybe you guys could do with larger real data, and see where's wrong...
Thanks.
If you don't want to publish your "finding" here, just PM or email me, thanks...
+ zero 10 times in 50 spins + loses + house edge = 0 bankroll
Notto,
You're 100% right...
Thanks.