#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Common interest => Online gaming => Topic started by: Halba1 on Jun 16, 12:45 AM 2011

Title: Betvoyager NZ table limit joke
Post by: Halba1 on Jun 16, 12:45 AM 2011
Their non zero outside bet table limits don't offer a lot of room for growth.

with those table limits, you can only make a small amount per session, and mostly you get stuffed / shafted by your latest progression so you may lose actually.

other casinos RNG has about $375 table limit for D/C, but it has the zeros. BV only $60 because no presence of zero. but BV doesn't cheat, other RNG **might** cheat. although I tested intercasino, found it to be pretty good.

smartlive is $675 or something for D/C but of course a lot slower than RNG. but it has the dreaded zero popping up - sure to lose on those

my conclusion is that baccarat/craps >>>> roulette(non zero BV) >> BV Zero RNG>> Zero RNGs.

playing a live baccarat may be best option, using bermuda triangle strategy.

live bacca also faster than live roulette. 1.2% house edge versus 2.5% for roulette.
Title: Re: Betvoyager NZ table limit joke
Post by: mr.ore on Oct 14, 02:49 AM 2011
With no zero just play with highest bet possible - only difference to a higher bet is time. Probability that you double your bankroll is same as probability that you lose it - 50%, because it is random walk. There is theoretically no need to change your bet size on no-zero, just wait instead, the effect should be same, but it would take a lot of spins. The main advantage of no zero roulette is that all systems are equally good or bad, so anything you play has same chance.