As you know I study ways of diminish the fluctuations so we do not have to stress our bankroll or play crazy progressions.
You also know that I love pattern event betting.
Usually my methods trigger after a complete loss. Like last one for instance
Dozzen
1
2
3
its a trigger
3
1
here I bet both dozzens 3 & 1
so I play them virtually and for the matter of this explanation I choose to play in this dimension and take note of the loss win registry after a Win and stop on a Loss
example:
L
L
L
W
W -->start to record here
W
L -->stop here
L
thus I get WWL
in this case I break even flat betting but this is not the point, the point is that I call betting in this phase, 1st dimension betting
i make a parallel bet in a 2nd dimmension too
it is based on the LW registry of the 1st dimension betting
imagine we have this
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
I choose to bet on the 2nd dimension by the rule: attack once after two consecutive losses.
In the example above I would have won on the last spin LL(bet)W
One can play as many dimmensions he wants too being each of them greater in success than the one before
i finished a test on my last dozzens system of 1000 placed bets
here are the results of first dimension bets (play after a Win and stop on a loss)
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| L |
| W |
| W |
| L |
| L |
don't panic
i give you the results
flat betting:
1005 placed bets
679 wins
326 losses
profit: 27 units
not a famous one I know. but this is for illustration purposes only.
2nd dimension results
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
so for our 2nd Dimension we have this results.
62 placed bets (one attack after LL)
50 wins
12 Losses
profit 26 units
... see that is practically the same profit that we achieved in dimension1 and with almost 6% of the bets placed
this is a huge demonstration on how patiente pays for less exposure.
Now check this out
apply any rule for playing the 2nd dimension results and call it 3rd dimension bets
if you choose a rule of: attack once after double loss LL, you would have Won every attack - but only two
if you played after a L you would have won 8 attempts out of 10 profiting 4 units flat bet always
What if you choose to attack after a Win and sop on a loss like in the 1st dimension?
you would have lost 10 attacks out of 49 profiting 19 units
a two step progression would have won all of those 49 attacks
so my rule to apply a progression to achieve maximum profit would be 4steps for 3rd dimension betting.
and this can be done with any system making it as effective as possible.
In my humble opinion this is as close as one can get.
I also have a friend of mine applying project 202 mm to the bet so we can make other conclusions to the method-
Zer0Blue
Its a bit complicated to me....so you said in other thread (Code 4) it would make it unbeatable, right?
Finally . . . Finally . . . the best way that I have seen for betting Dozens and Columns.
I have applied this system to my previous results and in all cases came out ahead. Even though the number of bets is less frequent, it is the amount of profit for so little risk that is amazing. Patience is indeed a virtue.
Can’t wait to try this with a Dozens & Columns system that produces more frequent bet selections (to produce more Wins and Losses to track). Example, bet against last or second to last Dozen and Columns.
I simultaneously used both
(1) bet once after double loss (LL) AND
(2) bet after a win (W) and keep betting until a loss (got some nice streaks).
This is a gem. It is why I try to read all threads because you never know what will help.
I hope others realize it’s potential. Thanks again.
Nick
Quote from: Nickmsi on Jul 09, 11:59 AM 2011
Finally . . . Finally . . . the best way that I have seen for betting Dozens and Columns.
I have applied this system to my previous results and in all cases came out ahead. Even though the number of bets is less frequent, it is the amount of profit for so little risk that is amazing. Patience is indeed a virtue.
Can’t wait to try this with a Dozens & Columns system that produces more frequent bet selections (to produce more Wins and Losses to track). Example, bet against last or second to last Dozen and Columns.
I simultaneously used both
(1) bet once after double loss (LL) AND
(2) bet after a win (W) and keep betting until a loss (got some nice streaks).
This is a gem. It is why I try to read all threads because you never know what will help.
I hope others realize it’s potential. Thanks again.
Nick
@Nick
Hermes has a Super System for Dozens and Columns.
You should try it out
I tested this so far over 10,000 placed bets.
Good Luck
Zer0Blue
Quote from: marivo on Jul 09, 08:35 AM 2011
Its a bit complicated to me....so you said in other thread (Code 4) it would make it unbeatable, right?
Please note that the thing is not the rule itself you apply. It is the patience of observing the LW registry and
choose a suitable rule for it.
This is a major breakthrough in system betting.
Any doubts, just shoot.
Zer0Blue
hello ZeroBlue.
"so my rule to apply a progression to achieve maximum profit would be 4steps for 3rd dimension betting"
[/size]
[/size]how would you play 3rd dimension betting?
Victor's LW strategy on his old forum is a nice way on utilizing the LW registry.
Regards
Max
Quote from: MAX on Jul 11, 05:31 AM 2011
Victor's LW strategy on his old forum is a nice way on utilizing the LW registry.
Regards
Max
may you post a link or details? i would love to read it!
thanks
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 09, 02:43 PM 2011
Please note that the thing is not the rule itself you apply. It is the patience of observing the LW registry and
choose a suitable rule for it.
This is a major breakthrough in system betting.
Any doubts, just shoot.
Zer0Blue
Yes I got it now, thanks. You play Code4 like this? Maybe you can show how it actually looks like paying it with this method? I mean whats the most effective way to track this....Thanks again.
@marivo
i do not play code4 like this because it does not lose so often
so I couldn't even reach 3rd dimension in a life time. ;-)
i use it with thezerodozens system i posted.
also the results posted here are real and from that simple one system.
BR
Quote from: ZeroBlue on Jul 09, 02:39 PM 2011
Hermes has a Super System for Dozens and Columns.
You should try it out
I tested this so far over 10,000 placed bets.
Zer0Blue
Brilliant thread Zer0Blue!
For those with patience its not hard to consistently win this way.
2 questions for you:
(1) Did you test this method on 10,000 spins of the method you posted here link:://rouletteforum.cc/full-systems/zer0-dozens-columns/ (link:://rouletteforum.cc/full-systems/zer0-dozens-columns/) or the one you mention Hermes posted?
(2) Can you post the link to the Hermes system
Bettor 27
Quote from: Bettor 27 on Jul 14, 09:37 PM 2011
Brilliant thread Zer0Blue!
For those with patience its not hard to consistently win this way.
2 questions for you:
(1) Did you test this method on 10,000 spins of the method you posted here link:://rouletteforum.cc/full-systems/zer0-dozens-columns/ (link:://rouletteforum.cc/full-systems/zer0-dozens-columns/) or the one you mention Hermes posted?
(2) Can you post the link to the Hermes system
Bettor 27
yes it was with that method
i can not seem to find hermes system maybe he will come up and explain it again.
anyone know what zero blues system was? the link won't open it
thanks
Quote from: Tomla021 on Apr 09, 12:09 PM 2015
anyone know what zero blues system was? the link won't open it
thanks
Hello Tom, the Zer0 D/C system is here at:
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6497.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6497.0)
Cheers!
Vic
thanks mr victor
Quote from: Tomla021 on Apr 09, 12:09 PM 2015
anyone know what zero blues system was? the link won't open it
thanks
Quote from: VLS on Apr 09, 02:37 PM 2015
Hello Tom, the Zer0 D/C system is here at:
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6497.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6497.0)
Cheers!
Vic
This is why we're on here, being able to look up old methods, you never know months or years later someone finds the missing part to a method.
Cheers to all you fellow rouletters
Good one tnx!
Thanks Vic!
Looks good.
Hey guys, we're here to help each other & all credit goes to Zer0Blue
He had interesting Lw-based ideas on his threads and posts. e.g.
Zer0Dozens
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6481.5 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6481.5)
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6106.msg58541#msg58541 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6106.msg58541#msg58541)
:)