#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

i think Albalaha should stay. Though he did try to sell some stuff  in the past, but for all i know he
mostly discusses roulette.

Hello Friend,

I don't think Albalaha is trying to sell his system. He is a nice guy and a very helpful person.

Regards

sniper

I'd like to see him stay.

peoples, are you xxxx? to start a thread with this topic simply mean you are xxxx.  :question: Albalaha is a opportunist person. he has threat to leave before. now Steve is here and he has got ideal environment to be disappeared. but if he wants to stay, there should not be any problem with it. please don't try to create wave on the water. enough was said. please no more thread with Albalaha's legs.
thanks
catalyst

Quote from: catalyst on Jul 22, 10:18 PM 2011
peoples, are you xxxx? to start a thread with this topic simply mean you are xxxx.  :question: Albalaha is a opportunist person. he has threat to leave before. now Steve is here and he has got ideal environment to be disappeared. but if he wants to stay, there should not be any problem with it. please don't try to create wave on the water. enough was said. please no more thread with Albalaha's legs.
thanks
catalyst

i agree. that's what i mean. i don't want to force anyone's decisions, i am just for freedom of choice. I mean Steve considers Albalaha a typical scummer, which is not correct, i think.
i think he should have a choice either to stay or to leave, he is not just a scummmer, he is someone really interested in roulette. If he leaves i won't cry, if he stays it is fine with me. I am just for freedom of choice for him. He is here not for scumming, at least mostly not for it.
and he is a contributor too. so here u go.

I would like to stay if given full respect and liberty as always. I feel that I am more of a provider than taker, on this forum and hence my expectations are not too much.

QuoteI would like to stay if given full respect and liberty as always

Al, you have been a member here for a long time, many of us have, I don't think anyone has the right to ask for respect, it should be earned. A while ago you were trying to sell a method, that is what brought disrespect to you, you get labelled in peoples minds so whenever you post again they remember the bad times, its human nature.

If you didn't keep on about it it would eventually be forgotten, but you keep on, feeling the heat from other posters AND you show it, so those who have some sort of hatred against you get to enjoy your missery when you post things like "Im thinking of leaving the forum" the fact that you posted it proves you don't really want to leave, you were crying out for some sort of help, you want them to stop rather.

If I were you, I would stay and ignore all the crap that gets flung around, post what you want to, in which threads you want to, the mods do a good job here so let's just all get along.

Side note::

Theres getting to be a few too many personal discussions on this forum lately, Als' fight and the new ownership, are we here to discuss others persona or roulette?

I know superman,
           there are many members thinking your way too. I am not here to please each and everyone. Respecting someone may look very big thing to you but I think every member here deserve that unless he himself get engaged in mudslinging.
                         I know many guys are frustrated with me but a few are happy too so I need to see them and ignore others.

In political terms, I agree with Nick.  :wink:


(I didn't vote, because there are not enough options to vote on.)

---

Do you want Albalaha to stay or leave?

   
• 1. Stay

   
• 2. Are you bothered either way, its it of concern to U?    1 No.

   
• 3. Are you bothered either way, its it of concern to U?    2.Yes.

   
• 4. Have U had breakfast Yet?

I voted he should stay, he is a good member with fresh and new ideas, why should he leave???
He didn`t offend me , why should I want him to leave?

So my decision is he shoulds stay!!!

kawa4711

Poll is indicating your safe this week Al.

Running at 60/30 in favour of staying.


Looking like your going to have to sing again in Next Weeks show, and face your audience again!

So, here is the Results of Our -Pan Global Panel, in....................
"The AL Factor Show"...
(cue Music)

@Chrisbis

I like your allusion to a talent show but I think some of these threads read more like soap operas.  :)

Robert.

PS I voted Stay.

Its entirely up to him, no one should be forced out. I have seen no evidence of Al trying to scam people. We have all made mistakes in the past, but it shouldnt be used as a stick to beat people with.

I like your talent show idea Chris made me smile, maybe we could do an X factor for roulette!

Quote from: sniper on Jul 22, 08:54 PM 2011
Hello Friend,

I don't think Albalaha is trying to sell his system. He is a nice guy and a very helpful person.

Regards

sniper

--You one of his satelites...didn't you hear him saying;yes I'm a system seller--in another thread...
   and all this time while Vic was boss he was telling diff.stories--we are friendly community that
   share ideas here.And all you that now vote for him to stay.......some of you should reread your
   past posts and hypocritical attitude concerning this matter...how sad,and all you that say he isn't 
   a scammer are wrong/as you are looking it from your point of view..didn't scam you personally/
   but there are 4 ppl.in here that say diff......neither you would come forward if it happened to you
   cause of embarassment...I personally think that he should stay now....so we get to know him
   better as a seller.
 

Hello F_LAT_INO,

There are 2555 members in this forum as of today. You are talking about 4 people here who bought his system. 4 out of 2555 people that is 0.15%. From the figure I don't think he is trying or keen to sell anything. I pm him several times asking questions about his system which I don't understand and he reply very fast without condition attached. He was very helpful and he never mentioned anything about selling. Please don't ever mention that I am associated to him without knowing my background. What prove have you got. I think it's wise to find out the truth before making any baseless accusation. We are all here with the same purpose, that is to work together as a team to beat the game and not to create enemy among ourselves

Regards

sniper

Quote from: sniper on Jul 23, 11:41 AM 2011
Hello F_LAT_INO,

We are all here with the same purpose, that is to work together as a team to beat the game and not to create enemy among ourselves

Regards

sniper

Well said...except that Albalaha wasn't here for such purposes,all his efforts contributing here was to make a money throughout selling or advertising other casinos with his every day winnings/which he got pay for it btw/with fabricated results.....you should learn my friend throughout others mistakes,or you blind.......all best world conmens are very nice indeed,didn't you know that.

Hello F_LAT_INO,

My friend, thanks for your advice and concern.

Regards

sniper

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Jul 23, 09:33 AM 2011

--You one of his satelites...didn't you hear him saying;yes I'm a system seller--in another thread...
   and all this time while Vic was boss he was telling diff.stories--we are friendly community that
   share ideas here.And all you that now vote for him to stay.......some of you should reread your
   past posts and hypocritical attitude concerning this matter...how sad,and all you that say he isn't 
   a scammer are wrong/as you are looking it from your point of view..didn't scam you personally/
   but there are 4 people.in here that say diff......neither you would come forward if it happened to you
   cause of embarassment...I personally think that he should stay now....so we get to know him
   better as a seller.
 

Flatino, he discusses roulette. yes, he was selling his systems, but he does not try it now  through the forum. So whatever is his past, it is over. He contributed as well. it would not be fair to kick him out because of his "past sins". In present i see him discussing roulette, not selling systems.
maybe i am wrong? i don't know

The poll is half-half when I saw it. With any normal member, it would be to clearly have him stay.

For those people that criticize me for querying whether or not he should be banned, perhaps you aren't aware of what he did at my other forum - spamming, contradicting himself, making it verry clear he didn't even know what he was talking about, coming back under fake names spamming and the list goes on.

Some people see why my queries are justified. Others think I'm the bad guy. Some people in the other thread really don't know what they're saying and I don't have time to respond to it all.

Albahah, I haven't responded on the other thread as I haven't had time yet. And I don't work on weekends anyway.

I have no doubt Albahah is scamming people. Yet at this stage, the majority of people still want him around. So the question for me is do members get what they want, even if it is bad for them and other members? The answer at this stage, although I don't agree with it, is yes. But I'll have to verify that all votes are legitimate.

As forum admin, I have been through this nonsense many times before. And I hate to see scammers get their way, and many people not seeing scammers for what they really are. I'm not attacking him personally. But absolutely I am sure he has been dishonest about many things - he has proven this. And I certainly don't believe any of his systems work - his methodology is all wrong.

Generally system sellers reduce integrity of forums, when they try to sell their systems through posts. Passive links such as mine do not interfere with discussions, but it is difficult to keep what you believe in out of discussions entirely whether there is a commercial product involved or not.

When it comes to Albalah, I dont know what he has done here. But I certainly know what he did at my other forum. He dominated discussions at one stage because all he was trying to do is sell. Most people wouldnt understand his contradictions and why they reveal him as someone who at least was dishonest.

recently he was talking only roulette and did not try to sell anything. maybe he did try something but it was long ago. so if he wasn't kicked out before then there is no reason to do it now. and he has lots of support from the members. including mods and coadmins i guess. and Vic was not so eager to kick him out.

so here we go.

Hey Steve,
                   It was apparent from you. Do you know people call you a scammer too? Ion Saliu has clearly alleged you of stealing his concept in entirety and selling it in your genuinewinner, which is a geniune loser for sure. I have earned from forums but by delivering quality and satisfaction and not by spamming or scamming. System writing is an art and I am pretty skilled at it. Ask my buyers or see my finest method and compare that with any session you can see. Everyone know that you have been in jail for cheating and your roulette computers will land many more there.
                                I said, it is not a priviledge for me to write here. Whichever forum I will move to will get good amount of readers because I deliver workable solutions.
                         Remember one thing: I do earn from forums and do not consider it a sin, so far I am delivering quality.

Albalaha, Ion Salui is clueless. I contacted him about his nonsense and he was probably too embarassed to respond. And my computers are used legally, and nobody has gone to jail for using them. My methods are universally accepted as effective, except by people with an agenda to discredit me. You claim to beat roulette with red/black which is just not possible. I did not go to jail for scamming, irrespective of what you have read from newspapers or transcripts. Do proper research before opening your mouth. But Albalaha, we are talking about you, not me. Stop trying to shift the focus.

Understand my position. If you are selling methods that lose people money, and claiming they work, that is a problem. Let's keep this simple:

1. Are you willing to send me one of your methods so I can test?

2. Answer the questions:

a. Does your method increase the accuracy of predicitions? (ie tell people with greater accuracy whether red/black will spin next)

b. Does your method rely on progression?

NOTE: Please everyone just stay out of the conversation and I'll work this out with Albalah. Either way, we'll find the truth about him. I suspect though that rather than follow a line of logical and reasonable questions, he will leave. The alternative is he stays and the questions reveal the truth, which is unfavorable to him.

Again Albalah, it is not personal. We'll find the truth, if you answer basic questions, or even simpler, just send me one what you say works.

Steve,
              Can't you see my finest method-rewritten which I recalled here many times as a part of my 8 systems that I teach in my e-book "King system". I have tested and played it 1000s of times and it worked in most of sessions and in overall, it works towards: Win more and lose less.
                           You can test this method yourself to see its effectiveness. I have clearly explained all requisites of this system. Mild progressions have also been used wherever required. If you use my rules of "pause" and "resume" properly, there is no doubt you should win most of the sessions than not.
                   Remember Steve, you are making me leave despite my contributions which has widely been accepted by most of the members here. You are the owner of this place, you have the right to sell systems and roulette computers yourself, however useless they may be but my genuine efforts, which is in form of an ebook, called "king System", which not even a single buyer has tried to bash ever in any forum is looking like scam to you. No wonder. It is about money, honey.
                    See the finest method-rewritten with open eyes and members' experience with that and then speak without prejudice.

No I am not making you leave. I am asking questions to learn the truth about you. Read what I said earlier.

Ok so you are willing to give me one of your systems that you claim wins more than it loses. Please PM me the details - ie where I can download.

Have a look here:
link:://rouletteforum.cc/albalaha%27s-exclusive/finest-method-of-defeating-roulette-rewritten/msg60614/#msg60614 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/../../albalaha%27s-exclusive/finest-method-of-defeating-roulette-rewritten/msg60614/#msg60614)

Ok thanks. I'll have a detailed look at it asap. But for now the obvious questions are:

1. If you have the holy grail and can beat RNG, why have you not destroyed every RNG casino?

2. Why have you not accepted the challenge at :.genuinewinner.com/100k.html (link:://:.genuinewinner.com/100k.html) but instead opted to sell your methods for small amounts?

I had a good look at the method. Question:

1. Is progression REQUIRED?

2. If numerous numbers qualify, will just betting on one of the qualified numbers still win in the long term?

Steve,
         Answer to both of your questions:
1. My methods are logical and not magical. I can win almost every session with my holy grail but not without risking my money. I am facing deposits and withdrawal problems with online casinos which restrains me for playing with good amounts. You can see in my section " daily winnings with betvoyager", I have multiplied my bankroll several times in a day. Since I keep testing new systems with real money, I keep losing my remaining bankroll too.
                                  I may be the only person in this forum who has cleared so many no deposit bonuses from a number of casinos. I have documented everything in my section for every one to see.
     Due to having trouble with deposits and withdrawal, I asked for a partner too, which you can also see in my section.
2. Regarding your 1 million challenge on your RNG, I can't do that because:-
       a. I can't deposit with you the required sum
        b. Being an attorney I know, such contract is not legal in my country and I can not enforce it through my courts.
        c. you want it to be done upon RNG which may be doctored to produce negative results for any system (victor himself has produced documented proof of that in this forum.). If you want a real holy grail which has won Zumma and other real live sessions, I can provide you that. How much can you pay for that?

Answer to questions relating to my finest method:


1. Progression is clearly mentioned. You need to keep a target earning which can be at least 12 units or 24 units. If you are playing flat bet and your total cost cuts the least target winning (12 or 24), you increase units on each qualified numbers accordingly.

2. In cases, multiple number qualifies, you do not bet but come to "pause" mode. You wait for a favorable condition to come where max 3 or 4 numbers qualify to bet upon and resume your game from there with required number of chips.

COMMENTS:

* I am not talking about your "holy grail". I only want to know about ONE method you claim beats RNG. Like one of those you sell. I only need one.

* You say your methods are logical. I'm trying to understand the logic because from what I see they are the opposite.

* The contracts would be enforceable so you claiming they are not enforceable is not a reason to claim $100k. Making it legally binding is the idea of working with the solicitors.

* Yes any system can be reverse engineered around a set of spins. Whether the initial testing spins are set or not doesnt matter because I woudnt even know the system until after I sent you the testing spins. And there is not a problem with getting 1m spins from a completely neutral source.

* Zumma spins is something from Don Young to test his system. His system doesnt work beyond those spins. Systems that win on predetermined spins are proof of nothing.


QUESTIONS:

* It makes no sense for you to test with real money. Anyone with something that beats rng would have the sense to test on rng machines without risking a cent. WHY ARE YOU NOT TESTING WITH RNG MACHINES WITHOUT MONEY? ( I mean like $100 rng hardware similar to what a casino would use)

* If you cant afford even $10k for a guaranteed shot at $100k with your "holy grail" that never fails, why should anyone believe you?

* Based on your response, your "finest method" needs progression. Correct me if I'm wrong.

* Regarding your "finest method", you appear to have said you will still profit as long as there is less than 4 qualified numbers. Is this correct?

The text in bold is most relevant.

First of all,
           I do not claim that every method of mine beats every session. It is just not possible.
regarding finest method:

1. It does require progression if it crosses a particular stage. How many times, should I speak it?

2. It can be played with minimum 1 and maximum 4 numbers. At some stage, past hot numbers (upto 4), which has not crossed 37 spins since it last appeared may also be played with base bet of 1 unit, or with half of the main bet progression because these numbers show the tendency to reappear after eloping from marquee.


                            Steve, how many $10Ks you have earned so far this way? If I can risk $10k of mine, I would increase it to $100k myself. I believe in playing feasible way and not blindly.
              If you want to see the real holy grail, come out with a feasible offer. If I will play 1 million recorded spins of a live casino, in overall, I will be a winner for sure.

Whether u will include past hot numbers with base bet/half bet or not should be your predetermined choice for every session.

Maybe there is a communication problem.

COMMENTS:

* I never said you said your method can beat every seession.

* Nobody has gotten to the stage where they deposit $10k. They have all failed once I send them 100,000 of my own spins.

* If you can select an online casino and account before starting, and I see you wager on 1m+ spins and win, then I would believe you. But no online casino would tolerate it long enough to see it, so the process would need to be repeated over multiple accounts, each with me having prior knowledge of account name and casino before commencement.

Ok so you have said your system needs progression. My next question didnt seem to be answered:

QUESTIONS:

* Does your method increase the accuracy of predictions? I'm referring only to the "finest method".

* Are you claiming that the "finest method" wins and even beats rng in the long term?

Dear Steve,
       Prediction is a wrong word here. I believe no one can predict the next outcome. Only a clairvoyant can claim it. I believe in specualtion and risk taking in a sensible manner to earn. My method speculates and wins, that I can say.

                                     Say, I have 1 million units and 1 million spins to play from any real recorded spins from any casino in the world, I will come out with 2 millions units at least. If you can put real 1 million spins data and my method and can process that automatically with some software, you can test it without bothering much.

The questions werent clearly answered, but from what I gather:

* Your methods do NOT increase accuracy of predictions
* Your method DOES AND MUST use progression

Is this correct?

You said:

QuoteSay, I have 1 million units and 1 million spins to play from any real recorded spins from any casino in the world, I will come out with 2 millions units at least. If you can put real 1 million spins data and my method and can process that automatically with some software, you can test it without bothering much.

Is this regarding your "finest method"?

Again I'm only looking for ONE of your methods that you claim will beat roulette in the long term. I'm not interested in your "very best" system that you refuse to sell.

Hey Steve,
        My methods are based upon reverse engineering concepts and hence has to win in long run.
My methods do not bother about:
1. Playing without any progression: whether we see logically or statistically, it is not possible to strike everytime within break-even period, unless you are extremely lucky, irrespective of your bet selection.
2. Prediction: As I said, I speculate and speculate with a logic. My logic behind the finest method is repetition of some numbers more than average which replaces certain sleeper numbers at that moment. The most interesting thing is we never put a single chip upon any sleeper number. This situation is bound to come in each and every session, sooner or later and my method of playing for this target capitalises this very well. "Pause" and "resume" take care of worst cases and  eliminates too risky progressions.  One hit eliminates all losses so far + a gain of atleast 12 to 24 units per hit.No Hidden math involved.

                     I can take your holy grail challenge with this method alone. With one million units and one million spins, it will come out with a very nice profit for sure. Test it, if you can and you will know as to why I call it as the finest.                           I know Steve, that you will provide many excuses to demean me and to disprove me but you know, you can't.     If you intent to let me leave this forum, be straight-forward to say so.
[/color]

link:://youtu.be/GqH21LEmfbQ (link:://youtu.be/GqH21LEmfbQ)

Al, you've made clear you only use progression. You've also explained the logic behind your
"finest system".

QUESTIONS:

* If you run a large simulation to see if a particular number has an increased chance of spinning again within 18 spins if it already appeared twice within 18 spins, and if this simulation showed no increase in the odds..... would you agree that the bet selection for your system alone does not at all increase the accuracy of predictions? Yes or No.

* If you are not increasing the accuracy of predictions, then all spins have independent odds (for example 1 in 37). So effectively, all spins would be independent. Then how would progression not be anything more than mere independent bets with different amounts wagered?

Saying your system passed a 1m spin test doesnt make it true. You say the system would pass my challenge, and that you have the holy grail, but you also say you cant afford $10,000.

QuoteI know Steve, that you will provide many excuses to demean me and to disprove me but you know, you can't.     If you intent to let me leave this forum, be straight-forward to say

Al, I'm just asking questions. Truth is truth. We're establishing truth. I'm not trying to demean you. You are making various claims, and I'm investigating. Why? It is nothing at all personal. It is because you are part of the forum with your own board, and selling systems. As new admin I need to make sure nobody is using the forum to mislead (intentionally or not) or harm people. So I am being fair by asking various questions to ascertain the truth - simple as that.

Dear Steve,
              " What may be right by probability, may get proved wrong by randomness". Roulette is a game of both probability and randomness. No one can ever predict with even slightest accuracy as to what is going to happen next spin or even in next 10 spins. The finest method of mine doesn't look for any particular number to hit but it bets for a particular event to come, which is bound to come, sooner than later. In this method, I have worked upon an event or phenomenon which rejoices a casino and frustrates most of the players.
                               Leave the probability or theoratical parts of this game which says this game is invincible. With my finest method, wherever you hit a number, you cover all the losses so far in your session. If you quit that moment, you are a winner. As simple as that.
                If you do not rely upon my claims, there are more than 50 live sessions of 185 spins each has been posted by me and some other members in link:://rouletteforum.cc/actuals-spins/daily-live-spin-data-screenshots-of-185-spins-from-smart-live-casino/105/ (link:://rouletteforum.cc/../../actuals-spins/daily-live-spin-data-screenshots-of-185-spins-from-smart-live-casino/105/)
you can compare my method at any of them, you will see it's 100% success yourself.

                        I openly claim that with this method and 1 million units, I can beat 1 million spins of any historical data taken from any real casino of the world. If you have got courage to accept my challenge, say so. If I proved wrong, nobody will see me writing anything regarding roulette ever in my life. Never say, roulette is unbeatable with even unlimited bankroll. I can beat it black and blue with 1 million units with this open system of mine and anybody can test it oneself.
                   

Quote"What may be right by probability, may get proved wrong by randomness"

What do you mean? How are they not the same?

Quote50 live sessions of 185 spins

That is far from 1m spins.

QuoteI can beat it black and blue with 1 million units with this open system of mine and anybody can test it oneself

Do you mean 1m spins or 1m units?

You claim your free system is the holy grail for roulette. You are saying it will win over 1m spins, and that is free for anyone to test. Ok thats great, so I'm going to test it - specifically the working principle of it. But first I need to understand it.

YOU STILL DIDNT ANSWER THE QUESTIONS THOUGH. PLEASE ANSWER THEM SO WE CAN PROCEED.

Al, regardless of what I believe, the polls are in your favour so you can stay. But I'd still like the answers.

I can't understand what you did not get about my system. I can help you understand it through skype, if you wish so. my skype is sumiteshwar.

                I am very firm with my challenge on this very method. I clearly claim without any ambiguity that this method of mine will clear 1 million past spins data of any real casino (no fabricated ones please). If I play this technique with 1 million units, even in the worst cases, it should yield not less than 2 hundred thousands units in net profit. Will you offer me any share of your challenged sum, if this method of mine do that?

Quote from: albalaha on Jul 26, 12:03 AM 2011
The finest method of mine doesn't look for any particular number to hit but it bets for a particular event to come, which is bound to come, sooner than later.

Why?

AD

Dear AD,
             See various sessions. Mostly, you get a hit with this method within a cycle of 37 spins. One hit and you have won.

Quote from: albalaha on Jul 26, 11:27 PM 2011
Dear AD,
             See various sessions. Mostly, you get a hit with this method within a cycle of 37 spins. One hit and you have won.

That's not a valid answer to the original question.

AD

i regret about starting this poll and i can clearly see that Albalaha is a troublemaker. I regret in voting in his favour.

Hey Dear Iggiv,
                    Do not regret. You just attacked me with wrong words and my words were merely a self-defence. Hatred begets hatred.

i did not attack u. I stated the fact. I saw you discussing roulette before I stated this fact. I saw you attacking Steve, I stated this fact. I said I am not so sure about you anymore. you called me "Steve's boy". holy molly, I am much older than you as much as I know. I don't need to be a mod. I just see things as I see them. you were allowed to stay in this forum with my help by the way, now you keep attacking Steve, and now you start attacking me for saying the truth.

You are a bad character. I could add a couple of more things to this picture, but I won't.

and please stop calling me "dear" after insulting me. it makes it even worse.

USERS CAN NOW CHANGE THEIR VOTE IF THEY WANT.

Steve,
    I always knew, whatever you doing now are just gimmics to pull me out of the forum while justifying it some way or other. Good luck.

After people see how you have behaved, some changed their mind. And me allowing people's changed minds to reflect in the poll is a GIMMICK???

Come on Al, kind of reaching..

This whole thing with you is just wasting my time.

Normally I would not even post here.
However...
As a mod in the previous admin.
And I think I am still am a mod for the time being.
I would like to say...

You have been warned.

Mods will not tolerate this kind of behaviour.

iggiv
If you feel that you have been insulted.
Please send me a PM.
Or send a pm to any other mod.
Or send a pm to Steve.

Thomas, I dont intend on changing the moderators and appreciate your help.

this Albalaha is a bad character indeed. He tried to sell me a king whatever system suite to my email. I was under other nickname then...

and i do not see he discussing roulette. he doesn't know how to discuss. He is even arrogant. And he thinks he owns the truth. as soon as i told him i was not a buyer he started to curse me and stuff.
He is a kid and an opportunist.

I also see many useless posts of him. i wonder what previous administration saw in this guy...

Also i have the wright to my opinion don't i?
:'(

xupamagaita, that sums it up. He was all over another forum of mine and eventually got banned because he was very clearly trying to scam people. As admin I saw him come back under so many fake names trying to do the same thing. Why does he bother when he can just use his holy grail? These people are everywhere. I understand they try to make a living, but it is at the expense of others.

Wow,
        Steve has bought a brainchild to curse me in his first thread. He was using another nickname earlier. What a joke. Steve you are really great.

Al, any admin here can see the ip address of the xupamagaita and check for a proxy. Sorry. Like you did before at RF, you being nothing more than a young kid and indeed scammer is shining through.

And accusing me of using fake names is funny coming from you, after what you did at RF. Now please answer the yes or no question. Just yes or no. No more runaround BS. YES OR NO. See other thread.

Wow,
           two nicknames/usernames of a member, that too in his first post. Only administrator can help one to get that.

Al, I don't need multiple usernames to show people what you are. And I'm not even trying to discredit you. What I'm trying to do is LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT YOUR SYSTEM. I already have my suspicions (ie I already know) but I'm still giving you the chance..... AND STILL YOU won't ANSWER THE YES OR NO QUESTION.

Q. If I find over 1M spins that once 2 numbers appear within an 18 spin window, that the same number spinning again still has a 1/37 probability of appearing within the next 16 or less spins (random)....... do you agree that this will mean that the principle your system is based on does NOT increase accuracy of predictions?

YES OR NO

I'm not wasting more time with you. If you don't give a yes or no answer..... to such a simple question, I will assume you do understand the relevance of the question and are trying to hide it and continue scamming. And I'm not going to allow that. Its a very simple yes or no answer.

This will be your final chance.

I have answered that as No in another thread already.

I am an alter ego?
lol
of course not.
You would remember me if i told my previous nickname.
All in all your conscience will dictate the truth.
Why bother...