#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => General Discussion => Topic started by: ljimmyd on Aug 01, 04:55 AM 2011

Title: Discussion on Ion's hidden roulette strategies
Post by: ljimmyd on Aug 01, 04:55 AM 2011
Hi all:

There are a lot ideas on roulette, it's important to use the only ones you believe in. I think there would be some Ion's fan like me. But to some reason, Ion didn't give away all his roulette strategies in book or web site. He did mentioned some pieces of them sometimes, so I wonder maybe we can figure some out together.

The first myth is from the book. He used a In/De system, with a number: 11. As he mentioned, the 11 is the FFG median for roulette, anyone ever figured out this method?

Secondly, he mentioned once in his Hemis strategy that "Remember also that any phenomenon tends to repeat more often after a number of trials less than or equal to the FFG median..." anyone knows what it means?

Lastly, when he tried to apply the Birthday Paradox to roulette, he mentioned one more method "This system can be applied without much tracking. Still, recording the spins is of considerable help. You can easily see that shorter unique-only strings are frequent after longer unique strings....." I think I know how to deal with this last one - i.e. If the latest spin is not a number repeation of the last 15 spins, then we call it a "Unique", if there are four or more consecutive "Unique" happens, bet on the last 15 spins numbers with a martingale.

cheers everyone

Jimmy

BTW, I think I read once from somewhere that Ion said he had 11 roulette parameters.. so if anybody ever has read some words beyond the known strategies from Ion, please post. Thanks
Title: Re: Discussion on Ion's hidden roulette strategies
Post by: VLS on Aug 04, 04:50 PM 2011
Quote from: ljimmyd on Aug 01, 04:55 AM 2011
"Remember also that any phenomenon tends to repeat more often after a number of trials less than or equal to the FFG median..." anyone knows what it means?


Hi Jimmy,


When you observe the game for long enough you realize the "clumping" effect in roulette.


I think he is referencing this effect. That after a while without an event showing, it tends to show more than what it is expected in order to balance (even out) the missing appearances ratio.


For instance, say a number must hit once in 37 spins as an ideal rate, and it doesn't show up in 150+ spins, then you can expect a "clump" of more than one time in a set of 37 spins.


When?... That's the catch! But at least we know that by betting right after it already shows we might catch the evening out and make some units.

It is betting against the maximum extremes (sleepers) what should be avoided.


Regards and nice to see you posting,
Victor
Title: Re: Discussion on Ion's hidden roulette strategies
Post by: Steve on Aug 04, 05:49 PM 2011
While there is indeed "clumping", you need to determine whether or not you can use it to increase accuracy of predictions. ACCURACY OF PREDICTIONS is paramount.