1. You use the previous three.
2. If the first outcome is the same as the first outcome with your previous three - you play opposite twice.
3. If the first outcome is the opposite as the first outcome with your previous three - you play same twice.
4. You only play after two loses has appear - you only attack twice.
5. If two loses you wait for a new trigger/sequence.
6. Feel free to use any progression you like.
WWWWLWLWWLWWWLWWWWWW LL LWLW :o 300 trails ...
Just a couple of clarifications:
You only play after 2 lossess. but if you then get a W, do you wait for another trigger, or do you continue with the next set of 3?
Do you play 1-2, 1 and stop or 1-1? Because if you attack twice flat, you'd have a lot of "draws".
Thanks
Jeromin
Well i run some more trails and it is not working - i once got four loses in a row - that was not the main idea ...
I reacon play oppisite toward previos three after fictive win still is the best. I will post some more clear rules and illustration towards this kind of betting.
Quote from: ego on Sep 27, 06:27 AM 2011
Well i run some more trails and it is not working - i once got four loses in a row - that was not the main idea ...
I reacon play oppisite toward previos three after fictive win still is the best. I will post some more clear rules and illustration towards this kind of betting.
dear ego
will this system work for flatbetting?
please clarify the rules.
thanks
catalyst
Quote from: ego on Sep 27, 03:21 AM 2011
1. You use the previous three.
2. If the first outcome is the same as the first outcome with your previous three - you play opposite twice.
3. If the first outcome is the opposite as the first outcome with your previous three - you play same twice.
4. You only play after two loses has appear - you only attack twice.
5. If two loses you wait for a new trigger/sequence.
6. Feel free to use any progression you like.
WWWWLWLWWLWWWLWWWWWW LL LWLW :o 300 trails ...
You need around 1000 actual outcomes/results to have a good idea of how a system plays. Forget the number of spins or trails as it's misleading.
Your idea is worth a look though.