#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => General Discussion => Topic started by: Proofreaders2000 on Feb 27, 09:49 AM 2012

Title: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Feb 27, 09:49 AM 2012
I'm think the Grail looks like: chips on one number, should hit within 10 spins 90% of the time.

Any thoughts on this?
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: ego on Feb 27, 11:48 AM 2012

I believe if some one like Kim Larsen understand how to capture favorites or repeaters or imbalance on regular basis using some kind of periodic present state - you would have the Grail.

Assumptions with the following statement above is that why would Kim Larsen disappear with out any way to find any material about him or buy hes book.
Conclusion is that eitherway so was he as successfully as the storeys goes or he end up poor where all hes methods would be regarding as a joke or him as clown.
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: maestro on Feb 27, 01:08 PM 2012
ego what are stories about this kim larsen never heard of him...can you please tell as..or can i read somewhere...thanks :thumbsup:
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: ego on Feb 27, 01:25 PM 2012
Quote from: maestro on Feb 27, 01:08 PM 2012
ego what are stories about this kim larsen never heard of him...can you please tell as..or can i read somewhere...thanks :thumbsup:

Search Kim Larsen and Roulette - all you will get is how he turn a small amount of money to 5k during a few hours witch was shown on TV and stories that he had developed hes own chaos theory witch seem to work out pretty good.
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: soggett on Feb 29, 03:16 AM 2012
If you mean the Holy grail, it should look something like this:

(link:://:.graphpaper.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/holy_grail_660.jpg)

:D
Joke aside

Shouldn't the grail win every bet you make? you bet on number 1 it hits, you bet on high it hits, you bet on street 6 it hits...
I imagine it that way, thats why it does not exist, there are only bad, good and better systems
Thats what I think
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: superman on Feb 29, 03:51 AM 2012
QuoteI imagine it that way, that's why it does not exist

LOL you would be banned the same day if you had that.

The grail in my opinion is when you win more than you lose in every session, the odds are more in your favour, you hit more than 50% of the time, that's all we need, 3 to 5% better than we are at now.
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: frost on Feb 29, 04:10 AM 2012
a 'grail' should win every session. not every bet. that is impossible.
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: soggett on Feb 29, 03:09 PM 2012
Quote from: superman on Feb 29, 03:51 AM 2012

LoL you would be banned the same day if you had that.

The grail in my opinion is when you win more than you lose in every session, the odds are more in your favour, you hit more than 50% of the time, that's all we need, 3 to 5% better than we are at now.

Yes,
imagine, You just sit down, place a max limit bet on whatever and you're done for today  :)

I agree with you, as long as you win more than you lose you have a winner, call it a grail or whatever you want

What if you have a system that uses a progression and always ends the session in plus?how would that be considered? Like a 35 step progression on a dozen? (that's just for an example - I know the table limits, bankroll, etc but I can't think of anything else at the moment ;D )
You lose and lose but when you win you are in plus - thus every session is positive, no negative sessions
Would that be a grail?
Like frost said - win every session and not every bet


P.S.
If you have something like that feel free to PM me  :D :D
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: Tamino on Feb 29, 03:29 PM 2012
Sometimes it is better to forgo a win than to create a loss. ( quote by C. Kaisan  )

Nathan Detroit
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: niksa on Feb 29, 04:27 PM 2012
Quote from: soggett on Feb 29, 03:09 PM 2012



What if you have a system that uses a progression and always ends the session in plus?how would that be considered? Like a 35 step progression on a dozen? (that's just for an example - I know the table limits, bankroll, etc but I can't think of anything else at the moment ;D )
You lose and lose but when you win you are in plus - thus every session is positive, no negative sessions


Uh,that looks like famous,this as I have seen somewhere?? lol  :twisted:
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: Steve on Feb 29, 05:20 PM 2012
It looks like this:
(link:://truth-revelations.com/wp-content/themes/truth/nous/images/168_8_.JPG)
link:://truth-revelations.com/wp-content/themes/truth/nous/images/168_8_.JPG (link:://truth-revelations.com/wp-content/themes/truth/nous/images/168_8_.JPG)
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: Steve on Feb 29, 05:26 PM 2012
Seriously though, that is pretty much the answer to your question. Everything exists as a result of harmonic vibrations / waves. Understand and tracking the relationship between them is what you want. See :.genuinewinner.com/waves.pdf (link:://:.genuinewinner.com/waves.pdf)

But there are plenty methods to beat roulette that dont require you to understand how the primordial universe works.
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: GARNabby on Mar 01, 09:09 AM 2012
It's as hard to figure out as it is self-evident afterward.  Ie, the faster you could realize that it's the solution, the longer it would take for you to figure it out.

Quote from: Steve on Feb 29, 05:26 PM 2012
Everything exists as a result of harmonic vibrations / waves. Understand[ing] and tracking the relationship between them [those] is what you [are] want[ing]. See :.genuinewinner.com/waves.pdf (link:://:.genuinewinner.com/waves.pdf)
What of also the basic particle-state of nature?  The problem with String Theory is that by the time every thing, including the particles, has been mathematically described in terms of only the waves, every thing which was knowable will have already became known.  It's the theory which isn't meant to be any more than a theory, there's no way to test any of it out in practice... certainly not in the overall sense, by which the thing could confirm itself.

Quote from: Steve on Feb 29, 05:26 PM 2012
But there are plenty methods to beat roulette that don't require you to understand how the primordial universe works.
Every player is beating the game.  Why else would each continue to play?  What must change is their definition of "a beating".
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: Iggy on Mar 01, 02:53 PM 2012
QuoteBut there are plenty of methods to beat roulette.

PLEASE name one. I have never found one yet ...............

iggy
Title: Re: What does a Grail look like?
Post by: frost on Mar 01, 05:55 PM 2012
he has got a point (steve). i think we over complicate roulette and so we find it even more difficult to win.


i went to the casino the other day. first time as i used to play on-line. i was amazed to see they actually display percentages on the marquee.


i made 6 bets. i lost 2. the only reason i lost two was cos i was getting carried away (i was getting excited cos i was winning. forgot to remain calm)


that's one method you could use.


if your interested i was only playing outside bets. minimum bet 5 units. I started 10. I left with 50.


I think Steve once said the best way to win  a roulette is to increase the accuracy of your bets.


trust me. he was right.