#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => General Discussion => Topic started by: deepred on Feb 29, 11:42 AM 2012

Title: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: deepred on Feb 29, 11:42 AM 2012
 I am looking for the mildest progression for a 12 number bet. My mininum bet would 1 dollar and I cannot use half dollar increments so it would have to look like 1112233456789 and so on. Any help would be appreciated.
                                                              Thks  GJ
Title: Re: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: amk on Feb 29, 11:56 AM 2012
Hello deepred,

This is the progression which Madmax's progression calculator shows, not mild but the standard progression.

Prog.

1
1
2
3
4
6
9
14
21
31
47
70
105


Total Stake

12
24
48
84
132
204
312
480
732
1104
1668
2508
3768
Title: Re: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: monaco on Feb 29, 12:37 PM 2012
.
Title: Re: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: soggett on Feb 29, 03:21 PM 2012
Quote from: deepred on Feb 29, 11:42 AM 2012
I am looking for the mildest progression for a 12 number bet. My mininum bet would 1 dollar and I cannot use half dollar increments so it would have to look like 1112233456789 and so on. Any help would be appreciated.
                                                              thanks  GJ

Do you mean 12 straight up bets or a dozen bet?
The progression steps are the same, like amk posted, only the needed bankroll is different
And of course the amount won at every step  ;)
Title: Re: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: deepred on Feb 29, 07:41 PM 2012
 Thanks for the ideas. You cant win with a straight dozen bet. You have to break things down further so I have been fooling around with different ways of incorperating a dozen progression into different areas. Was hoping there would be a proggression with a little slower rate of increase as I have yet to go past 10 losses in a row but I guess because I cant bet half units it kind of holds me back. Maybe if I start with a 2 dollar min bet then I could use half bets. If this pans out I will post my method.   
                                                            Thanks again   GJ
Title: Re: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: ego on Mar 01, 06:29 AM 2012

If the selection has strike ratio - then you don't need to win every bet to gain a total profit.
Then you could use a line like 1 1 1 1 2 2 and so on.
Title: Re: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: deepred on Mar 01, 09:37 AM 2012
 This is a sample of my hit rate taken from spielbank at random  100 continuess numbers
  1-3-1-2-3-3-2-2-1-2-2-5-4-1-1-6-2-4-1-2-2-2-3-2-1-5-2-1-1-2-2-1-1-3-2-3-1-3-3-2-2-5-2-2       As you can see it looks pretty impressive and consistant. My biggest problem is I just cant seem to bring myself to put my money on the line yet as I always feel the bad run is just around the corner. If someone wants to give me a date and table number I will check those results and see if I get the same results.
                       Thks   GJ
Title: Re: progression for 12 number bet
Post by: soggett on Mar 02, 01:32 AM 2012
Quote from: deepred on Mar 01, 09:37 AM 2012
This is a sample of my hit rate taken from spielbank at random  100 continuess numbers
  1-3-1-2-3-3-2-2-1-2-2-5-4-1-1-6-2-4-1-2-2-2-3-2-1-5-2-1-1-2-2-1-1-3-2-3-1-3-3-2-2-5-2-2       As you can see it looks pretty impressive and consistant. My biggest problem is I just can't seem to bring myself to put my money on the line yet as I always feel the bad run is just around the corner. If someone wants to give me a date and table number I will check those results and see if I get the same results.
                       thanks   GJ

I agree with ego, it all depends on your systems strike rate
There are many numbers in the actuals area so you can check your system

I suggest maybe 1 unit up every 2 loss, 2 units down on a win, stop when in plus
But like i said, it depends on the system itself
What is the systems lose pattern?What has to accure for it to lose the 12 steps?When you know that then you know will it lose or not in the long run