I've made this test over one million spins to see the behavior of this theory. In the table below you can se the results
[attachimg=1]
It means that 5454 cycles of 37 spins had 23 numbers, 5499 cycles of 37 spins had 24 numbers and so on....
The minimun of different numbers we see is 16 (3 times) and the maximun is 31 (2 times)
More than 90 % of all the cycles had between 21 and 27 differents numbers
Very nice,and now the question is, how from this knowledge
one can conclude a winning method.I have no idea thats why
am asking.Have you.
@intrinseco
I am very well aware of these statistics. I made intersting system by that principle. Which in practice still makes profit for my friend.
If you are interesting in exploatation of law of the third, maybe it can be helping line to you?
Cheers
Drazen
Yes I am interested on it , could you send it to me ?
I was thinking on this:
1. Track spins until you get 22 different numbers
2. Then bet on that numbers for x spins
X= 37 - num spin of the first bet
So if we get the 22 numbers on spin 31. Then X= 37-32 =5
On spin 32 we start bet the 22 numbers for 5 spin
The other option could be just flat bet for one spin , when loss we increase the unit to bet for the next cycle
I am working on a system based on the LOTT. MattyMattz even wrote me a little Excel program for it. Might post it later.
Not to criticize, but I totally don't get your chart
What would be meaningful to me and my system would be this:
I did 100,000 37-spins cycles.
In those 100,000 cycles, there were N numbers that hit once BEFORE one of them hit twice. Of a group of 15 numbers that have hit once and only once, how many spins until one of them hits twice. if a number hits twice in the trot, take out all previous numbers up to and including the repeating number.
You must have 15 numbers that have hit once and only once.
Maybe that is in your chart and I'm just to dense to see it.
Thanks for you efforts. You could really help me with this idea, what with all your knowledge.
Oh, we all know...just in case I post my system...that the Law of the Thirds is more of and idea or suggestion, not a law.
Sam
Really truthful aside: I'd post the system, but I don't want to appear as I'm trying to vie with JL. When his star has turned to a black hole, I'll show you something pretty salty.
Quote from: intrinseco on Jun 14, 11:51 AM 2012
Yes I am interested on it , could you send it to me ?
link:://rouletteforum.cc/main-roulette-board/4/system-based-on-law-of-the-third-need-comments/4960/msg49578#msg49578 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/main-roulette-board/4/system-based-on-law-of-the-third-need-comments/4960/msg49578#msg49578)
Here you go. When you study it you will see one can develop more angels of approach.
Regards
Drazen
my idea did well on 10k spins, I'm betting on 23 numbers with this progression [1,2,5] . Every time I have 23 numbers I bet on them for 1 spin (always in a 37 spin cycle). If I loss start tracking again until I have anothers 23 numbers and I bet 2 units on each number for one spin..and so on. Reset progression on a Win
Hi intrinseco
I'm a little puzzled, shouldn't you have more cycles of 37 nubers if you did 1000000 spins?
you should have 999963 cycles if i am right:
spin 1 - spin 37 - cycle 1
spin 2 - spin 38 - cycle 2
spin 3 - spin 39 - cycle 3
etc
Shouldn't you test it that way?
If you do it would be interesting to compare the results
Quote from: soggett on Jun 17, 05:53 AM 2012
Hi intrinseco
I'm a little puzzled, shouldn't you have more cycles of 37 nubers if you did 1000000 spins?
you should have 999963 cycles if i am right:
spin 1 - spin 37 - cycle 1
spin 2 - spin 38 - cycle 2
spin 3 - spin 39 - cycle 3
etc
Shouldn't you test it that way?
If you do it would be interesting to compare the results
I know what you mean, but I didn't in that way for two reasons:
1) I think the final result would be the same
2) It just took to me about 10 minutes to code this test. Doing in your way its about hours, may be more than one day. Because it was just a test to see the behavior of the LOT I din't want to pend much time on it. I'd rather use this info to try invent some system or method.
regards