Hi folks,
Try this out as I think it has legs.
Based on four blocks of 9 again:
1-9 =1
10-18 =2
19-27 = 3
28-36 = 4
Wait two spins. Example:
11
34 These equate to numbers 2 + 4 in the 9 blocks
Place bets on 2 + 4
7 Thats a loss, and part of block 1, so now we place bets on blocks 1 + 4
So basically, we are betting the previous two 9 blocks constantly.
Stop if you lose 4 in a row. Wait for a winner then start betting again. You could double or triple stakes until you are in or near profit and then reduce to original stake.
Enjoy.
BW
Thanks for sharing with us BW :thumbsup:
Example:
20
11 now bet blocks 2 + 3
3 LOSS now bet blocks 1 + 2
30 LOSS 1 + 4
17 LOSS 2 + 4
29 WIN
0 LOSS
20 LOSS
22 WIN
29 WIN
13 LOSS
6 LOSS
5 WIN
11 WIN
7 WIN
15 WIN
9 WIN
14 WIN
7 WIN
16 WIN
12 WIN
35 LOSS
29 WIN
16 WIN
28 WIN
18 WIN
0 LOSS
24 LOSS
11 WIN
2 LOSS
6 WIN
5 WIN
19 LOSS
15 LOSS
12 WIN
2 LOSS
34 LOSS
24 LOSS
16 LOSS 4 Loss, wait for virtual win
29 -
32 < here, now start betting again
17 WIN
7 LOSS
4 WIN
3 WIN
The long string of winners there is quite rare, and expect a 4 loss, its how you manage it that counts. If you do, then this is profitable. Don't go using extended marty's. A steady prog should be enough
BW
I tried it myself, here the restults:
33
16
2 L
18 W
24 L
12 W
34 L
34 W
14 W
21 L
16 W
13 W
19 W
9 L
4 W
19 W
22 L
3 L
28 L
26 L - 4th loss
36 W
11 L
32 W
29 W
29 W
12 W
36 W
17 W
8 L
34 L
10 L
31 W
23 L
3 L
26 W
27 W
16 L
22 W
30 L
8 L
12 L
24 L - 4th loss
22 W
Thanks for the testing, BBJ
As you can see, with a solid money management, this can overcome the 4 losses. Perhaps it would be more beneficial to use a regressive prog. such as 2, 1, 2, 3,
BW
Another session:
7
9
24
25 W
9 W
2 W
5 W
7 W
2 W
32 L
4 W
36 W
23 L
2 L
10 L
28 4 LOSS
14 VIRTUAL WIN
8 L
11 W
18 W
13 W
35 L
15 W
19 L
12 W
14 W
20 W
13 W
28 L
10 W
1 L
0 L
21 L
31 4 LOSS
1 -
10 -
17 VIRTUAL WIN
9 W
17 W
16 W
6 W
32 L
21 L
4 L
23 W
35 L
30 W
36 W
25 W
36 W
As you can see, after a 4 loss and a virtual win, you usually get another winner soon after in the second frame.
I'm still not certain about what progression to use with this, if someone has any suggestions.
Thanks
BW
11
8
34 L
20 L
23 W
25 W
27 W
36 W
35 W
17 L
13 W
2 L
4 W
30 L
21 L
6 L
8 W
22 W
19 W
24 W
23 W
31 L
33 W
3 L
32 W
30 W
24 L
22 W
23 W
4 L
7 W
25 W
27 W
12 L
19 W
29 L
22 W
29 W
16 L
13 W
18 W
11 W
19 L
7 L
25 W
18 L
27 W
9 L
24 W
2 W
A nice session there with no 4 losses, probably a rarity!
BW
Hi, buffalowizard,
thank you for your interesting approach to beat roulette.
I made a quick check with my real played spins and it looks good.
Perhaps a progression D`Alembert (1,2,3,4,5,6...and so on) would be interesting.
play: 1 unit till a LLLL wait for a trigger W thenn bet 2 units till a LLLL , wait for a W trigger then bet 3 units and so on.
This D`Alembert should be played till you have equalized the losses of the LLLL, then go back to 1 unit or back 1 step: means if you have 4 units in the game and you have got some wins you degress 1 step to 3 units.
This should be tested , it s only an idea.
Best regards
kawa4711
Hi Kawa,
Thanks for your progression idea, I think that would work really well. I think the non-aggressive approach would be better for this, in case of too many 4 losses.
I believe the good sessions would outnumber the bad, so it is battling these bad sessions which is key.
I will look into using your ideas.
BW
What about LW strategy?
Hermes
Some new results, with 2 times 4th losses:
36
3
6 W
17 L
33 L
0 L
6 L - 4th loss
23 L
29 L
32 W
5 L
13 L
15 W
21 L
18 W
24 W
8 L
8 W
20 W
1 W
14 L
36 L
3 L
1 W
34 W
28 W
12 L
25 L
20 W
5 L
3 W
33 L
31 W
36 W
10 L
36 W
9 L
35 W
21 L
2 L
25 W
7 W
32 L
22 L
1 L
10 L - 4th loss
33 L
29 W
Quote from: Hermes on Aug 22, 02:23 PM 2010
What about LW strategy?
Hermes
Yes hermes, that looks good from the results posted. Try betting after a loss for one spin
New restults:
20
12
20 W
5 L
19 W
32 L
17 L
20 L
22 W
0 L
28 L
8 L
33 W
33 W
12 L
33 W
20 L
7 L
17 L
8 W
16 W
30 L
8 L
13 L
12 W
28 L
1 L
32 W
11 L
11 W
15 W
31 W
32 W
0 L
29 W
22 L
6 L
9 W
32 L
7 W
15 L
8 W
35 L
15 L
13 W
13 W
20 L
19 W
21 W
12 W
20 W
20 W
30 L
36 W
32 W
A good one really. Very close to my smart progression technique. The main idea is to bet upon any set of numbers whether a single number or split or street or line or dozen or EC till break even point and if it doesn't appear till that, stop betting on it, and bet again with mild progression when it reappears.
The logic behind this is every set of number can not get hot and cold repeatedly.keep it up.
Bad results this time, with 4 times a 4th loss:
8
32
29 W
29 W
8 W
4 W
15 L
25 L
29 L
15 L - 4th loss
5 L
32 L
10 L
28 W
23 L
8 L
32 L
10 L - 4th loss
33 W
2 L
23 L
24 W
0 L
18 L
35 L
12 W
22 L
35 L
21 W
34 W
3 L
9 W
15 L
21 L
6 L
34 L - 4th loss
4 W
29 W
4 W
7 W
20 L
33 L
34 W
32 W
22 W
24 W
26 W
21 W
5 L
27 L
22 L
22 W
2 L
20 W
29 L
12 L
1 L
27 L - 4th loss
19 W
11 L
18 L
9 L
11 W
17 W
Maybe a regular question, but what is the LW strategy ? Is that when you lose you stop betting till a virtual win ?
Edit: What is this, I wanted to write s t u p i d question, but the word got changed to regular, that was not my intention :(
Hi BBJ,
yes that was a tough session. It would have been time to quit after the second consecutive 4 loss probably.
The LW would be to bet when a win comes after a loss. This could be just the one solitary bet until another trigger arrives. It's probably safer for this bet selection actually and the session you posted wouldn't have been so bad
BW
In the last results I posted are 4 single W's in a row, and if I understand correctly, reaching the 4th loss with the LW strategy, so that can happen too then.
Edit: I will do some more testing today, and will post it here, and maybe with a balance example with it. Luckily I do this with fun money with a demo account :)
Yes that's correct BBJ. It would have been a losing session whichever way you attacked it. Hopefully these double losses are rare enough so that we can take advantage when they don't occur. Thanks for your testing mate
BW
I gave this a try at william hill live casino. I started out ok and got a couple of wins straight off the mark then got a long string of losses. you're looking at quick up or quick down using this method. :(
Hit and run maybe. . .
Thanks for posting buffalow. . . . .
Quote from: Kingspin on Aug 23, 05:12 AM 2010
I gave this a try at william hill live casino. I started out ok and got a couple of wins straight off the mark then got a long string of losses. you're looking at quick up or quick down using this method. :(
Hit and run maybe. . .
Thanks for posting buffalow. . . . .
That's ok Kingspin, thanks for the testing. Back to the drawing board I guess!
Some new results, a bit avarage I think, half bad half good, 2 times a 4th loss and 17 losses in a row.
29
8
3 W
10 L
0 L
10 W
36 L
10 W
7 L
11 W
1 W
2 W
24 L
12 L
9 L
3 W
11 W
6 W
3 W
19 L
34 L
1 L
7 W
24 L
34 L
17 L
20 L - 4th loss
35 L
18 L
19 L
34 L
12 L
23 L
2 L
29 L
21 L
16 L
36 L
6 L
27 L - 17th loss
1 W
31 L
34 W
26 L
33 W
35 W
29 W
3 L
31 W
1 W
11 L
4 W
34 L
10 L
0 L
35 W
20 L
12 L
3 L
32 L - 4th loss
13 L
34 W
25 L
17 L
7 L
2 W
2 W
36 L
Some more results, I think a bit too many L's and too many single W's.
2
22
0 L
22 W
2 W
35 L
33 W
24 W
9 L
18 L
36 L
7 L - 4th loss
20 L
11 L
16 W
33 L
20 L
20 W
1 L
4 W
5 W
10 L
27 L
12 W
31 L
33 W
7 L
12 L
31 L
14 W
12 W
36 W
19 L
27 W
10 L
32 L
24 L
0 L - 4th loss
7 L
20 W
2 W
11 L
3 W
30 L
27 L
26 W
16 L
14 W
19 W
6 L
14 L
2 W
36 L
4 W
7 W
Great testing BBJ. Maybe the LW strategy isn't the best way for this, and to go back to the original.
So only one test so far where there are 2 lots of consecutive 4 losses, which would be the natural stop/loss point.
BW