Awakening Streets
===========
Track 12 real numbers and convert into "streets".
Only bet the streets which hit TWICE EXACTLY in the last 12 spins for 1 unit. Always play ONLY for 1 unit on the qualifiers.
Always update the list of 12 each spin and play only the qualifiers, if any, every spin! (those which are showing in the list TWICE EXACTLY) So we have a kind of a rolling list of 12 street numbers which is updated after each spin... So the first on the list will drop off the list when the first new street number is added etc. etc. you get the idea.
Anyway it means and is vital that you always have an updated list of the last 12 streets to appear in the order they came out... Got that?
It is simply flat betting all the way with 1 unit on the TWICE HIT streets only.
You have to check the list after each spin. Very Important.
The highest number of streets I had to bet was 5 but those occasions are minimal. Usually 1, 2 or 3; sometimes 4 or 5. Occasionally you will miss betting completely for a spin(s) when there are NO qualifiers.
But always keep the street list current. It is key.
Sometime a street will go out of qualification but then re-qualify after the next spin. It happens.
Just bet only the streets hit TWICE EXACTLY in the current 12 only.
Zero doesn't count in the tracking. It's a loss during betting of course.
Just bet 1 unit on the qualifiers, however many there are and whatever they are after you have refreshed the rolling street list of 12 after each spin... This means you will often be betting different streets each spin... or some same, some different - all depends what the TWICE HITTER's are in the current last 12.
Just bet the ones that hit TWICE EXACTLY in your current 12 only.
e.g.:
1,5,5,12,11,5,6,4,2,1,9,6
Here you bet: streets 1 and 6 only (they have hit twice exactly)
Street 8 hits. lost. update list...
5,5,12,11,5,6,4,2,1,9,6,8
Here you bet street 6 only (has hit twice exactly)
Street 6 hits. win. update list...
5,12,11,5,6,4,2,1,9,6,8,6
Here you bet street 5 only. (has hit twice exactly)
Oh Yeah. It's continuous betting all the way. LEVEL STAKES, remember!
No more than 1 unit on any street at any time. Stop when happy with profit.
The bets are only placed on the streets which hit TWICE EXACTLY - but only on those streets that qualify in the THE LAST 12 SPINS. The last 12 will change on every spin.
So you only EVER look at the LAST 12 spun streets on your list to find your DUAL HITTERS... This list of 12 is updated after each spin/bet. But you only look at the current last 12 you have recorded.
See these streets in the order they hit:
1,4,7,9,2,4,4,4,6,7,9,1,3,6,7,12,11,4,5,10,1,3,3,5,9,2,4
You are only interested in these latest 12 streets that hit
12,11,4,5,10,1,3,3,5,9,2,4
So on this spin you bet streets 3, 4 and 5 (have hit twice exactly) for 1u.
After the next result the 12 will drop off the list and the latest is added to the end e.g.:
#20 hits. Update list...
11,4,5,10,1,3,3,5,9,2,4,7
Bet streets 3,4 and 5 again (have hit twice exactly) for 1u.
It is just we are always betting on the "warm" streets or you might say awakening streets (those that hit twice only) within a cycle of 12. But at least we have set a trap for them should they re-occur... Of course not all will do so and, in any case, we all know it is not an exact science...
Atlantis.
Hello Atlantis,
Thanks for your system. I tested on the spins downloaded from Wiesbaden and it's holding well.
Right now I am still in the process of testing.
Tomorrow I will test it out in B & M casino.
Regards
Hi Sniper,
Good to hear, Sniper... (Might be small mistake in example so I will replay and repost it.)
A.
Hello atlantis
Did u compose the post or did u found it and copy/paste it....I am not accusing u of copy/pasting !
Its just that the man that composed this , he was all the time saying the same and the same all over again ;D
by the way I have tested this system loooong time ago....its like the rest.The only good thing is that its safer than others couse its flat.
"""Stop when happy with profit."""
Yes.This is the correct phrase when You have a winning system and not "stop when You have won X chips"
this is litlllle program i found on my old computer it will help tracking streets...i do not know where i got it but must be written by some genius... :thumbsup:
Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 30, 07:47 AM 2012
Did u compose the post or did u found it and copy/paste it....I am not accusing u of copy/pasting !
Its just that the man that composed this , he was all the time saying the same and the same all over again ;D
by the way I have tested this system loooong time ago....its like the rest.The only good thing is that its safer than others couse its flat.
Yes I composed it and yes I copied/pasted it from my posts in other forum - some time ago (vlsroulette)
A.
Quote from: maestro on Jun 30, 08:11 AM 2012
this is litlllle program i found on my old computer it will help tracking streets...i do not know where i got it but must be written by some genius... :thumbsup:
Hi maestro,
Thanks. It might help. Not so easy tracking and identifying qualifiers with this - especially if not much time between spins...
By the way, Wiesbaden 29/6/2012 Table#2 +44 in 55 spins.
A.
why just set up hits at 2 and then whithin12 and they come in less than second
Its variation of Mr J street system - betting on missing number from a street after 2 other numbers hit within 12-15 spins. U flat bet a missing number 4 12 spins. This works but I'm not sure about yr version. Why? Because in Mr J method u bet just 1u on each number n a strike rate is good enough. U win on average 30u n lose 12u. In 100+ spins its not unusual 2 make 200+ units. N u won't get better strike rate betting on whole streets. If You can choose between inside betting n outside always go inside. Just stick with d original method ;D Its good enough.
Hello Robeenhuut
My friend I don't think that the method that Atlantis posted is a variation of the other method u mentioned(and it wasn t even MR.J method...it was mattijohno method a lot years back). They are 2 def methods....the one u mentioned is based only on sleepers ,while Atlantis is based on both sleepers and repeaters. :)
I am not saying that one of them is better or worst...as always all methods are the same...all winning in good fluctuation and losing on the bad.(all end up in our usual -2,7)
maybe in this method we can add a kind of progression that will be based up on the HOW MANY streets we are betting...just an idea...
Also guys you can track the method very easily with the RX.... just configure the last 12 spins and open the streets graph...only problem is when a zero comes it can t be out of the calculation of the last 12
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jun 30, 08:41 AM 2012
Its variation of Mr J street system - betting on missing number from a street after 2 other numbers hit within 12-15 spins. U flat bet a missing number 4 12 spins. This works but I'm not sure about yr version. Why? Because in Mr J method u bet just 1u on each number n a strike rate is good enough. U win on average 30u n lose 12u. In 100+ spins its not unusual 2 make 200+ units. N u won't get better strike rate betting on whole streets. If You can choose between inside betting n outside always go inside. Just stick with d original method ;D Its good enough.
You are free to ignore it and play anything else as you wish, Robeenhuut. No - it's not the same thing.
If you are not sure about it - then why not do a few tests?? Don't just come on and dismiss it out of hand like that without doing at least *some* kind of test(s). You are welcome to comment and even to criticise constructively. My opinion: It IS easier to hit a street than a number - so in that respect it is more akin to recent System9, if anything else.
But I WILL delete if too many negative off-topic posts here in this testing thread. It is a testing thread. I did not post it as a fully-fledged finished system. There could be changes or improvements.
The idea for this came to me when testing a street method by BuffaloWizard some time ago and we corresponded by PM about it at that time - no doubt he will confirm this happened - and it was unrelated to the other systems that have been mentioned. And the name "Awakening Streets" - I just made/created that name today. It didn't have a name before. thanks.
A.
Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 30, 08:54 AM 2012
Hello Robeenhuut
My friend I don't think that the method that Atlantis posted is a variation of the other method u mentioned(and it wasn t even MR.J method...it was mattijohno method a lot years back). They are 2 def methods....the one u mentioned is based only on sleepers ,while Atlantis is based on both sleepers and repeaters. :)
I am not saying that one of them is better or worst...as always all methods are the same...all winning in good fluctuation and losing on the bad.(all end up in our usual -2,7)
maybe in this method we can add a kind of progression that will be based up on the HOW MANY streets we are betting...just an idea...
Also guys you can track the method very easily with the RX.... just configure the last 12 spins and open the streets graph...only problem is when a zero comes it can t be out of the calculation of the last 12
Hola Atlantis
I did not say that yr method is not good. I just see similarities with other method i play n i tested and played it a lot. See below....
I see lots of similarities between these 2 methods n d method i mentioned does not need a progression. I tested n played more than 1200 games n I'm still ahead quite big. If u patient enough (i sound like JL hehe) it will deliver. I asked intriseco 2 code it but its 2 much work apparently. He coded just one set of numbers n it was still ahead after 10k spins. But its irrelevant because it has 2 be played with win goal n stop-loss.
Hi RobeenHuut,
OK. I see.
Quote
If u patient enough (i sound like JL hehe) it will deliver.
Patience is a virtue. :)
""it was still ahead after 10k spins""
Intresting for flatbetting to still be UP after 10K spins.
This system u mentioned it s called "a full treet must hit" and Matijohno posted it before 4-5 years in VLS forum....the only def is that he was betting on cycles of 37 spins
Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 30, 09:23 AM 2012
""it was still ahead after 10k spins""
Intresting for flatbetting to still be UP after 10K spins.
This system u mentioned it s called "a full treet must hit" and Matijohno posted it before 4-5 years in VLS forum....the only def is that he was betting on cycles of 37 spins
I don't know about Mattjohno (sorry f i misspelled his name) but i toyed with this method long time ago n dropped it 4 some reason. D logic behind it is sort of questionable but it just delivers 4 some reasons. Not everytime but frequent enough. Its meant 2 be played just 4 a one hit but f u continue sometimes u get 3 or 4 within 10 spins. And payoff is 36/1. ;D
My contribution. :D
there are some gaps in the bettings because zero was hitting and I was not betting until I had 12 numbers without a zero.
In my testing the system revered nicely with a biggest down of -92 chips
(//)
"""dropped it 4 some reason."""
can we hear the reason?
Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 30, 09:33 AM 2012
"""dropped it 4 some reason."""
can we hear the reason?
Hehe curiosity killed d cat. ;D I just did due 2 lack of time not enough testing bk then.
Get d spins here from forum from SML where i usually play on airball n test around 19 sessions of 185 spins each. Playing straight balance around 1000u in plus ;D I know its only 4k spins but...
Master_of_Pockets wrote:
Quote
Also guys you can track the method very easily with the RX.... just configure the last 12 spins and open the streets graph...only problem is when a zero comes it can t be out of the calculation of the last 12
Yes that's unfortunate - same with the other tracker that maestro posted.
Still you can use JL's preferred tracker - pencil and paper!
A.
6 tests today. 4 on past wiesbaden spins, 2 on live autowheel. All have produced handsome + results (including a +37 in 37 spins at SLC)
I am SO happy I rediscovered this gem today. ;D
Play for real soon... :smile:
Quote from: atlantis on Jun 30, 06:05 AM 2012
Awakening Streets
===========
Track 12 real numbers and convert into "streets".
Anyway it means and is vital that you always have an updated list of the last 12 streets to appear in the order they came out... Got that?
.Got it,but what happens with updated list of the last 12 streets,and we got a hit on our targeted street....question;are we excluding our hit street and including 13 th.furthest street in the game now.
Hi Vile,
Not necessarily, but it depends...
After the hit update the list so you are showing the latest 12 street results. Continue to bet on any qualifying streets; that is any that have hit EXACTLY TWICE in the list of 12. So you disregard any previous results that have fallen out of the list and you are concentrating only on the CURRENT 12 results recorded for each spin of the game. Simply bet the dual hitters only within the updated list.
Say you've got these 12 recorded:
9-4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11-4 (qualifiers to bet: streets 4 and 9)
Next number is 26B
That is street 9 so we update the list to:
4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11-4-9 (qualifiers to bet: streets 4 and 9)
Next number is 14R
That is street 5 so we update the list to:
6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11-4-9-5 (qualifiers to bet: streets 5 and 9)
Street 11 does not qualify yet as it is shown hitting 3 times and we only bet dual hitting streets within the 12 spin window of consideration.
Cheers,
Atlantis.
""Street 11 does not qualify yet as it is shown hitting 3 times and we only bet dual hitting streets within the 12 spin window of consideration.""
I can t agree with this.
In my testings most of the times the new recoups were made because some streets t hit more than 2 times....3,4 even 5 times.
Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 30, 04:36 PM 2012
""Street 11 does not qualify yet as it is shown hitting 3 times and we only bet dual hitting streets within the 12 spin window of consideration.""
I can t agree with this.
In my testings most of the times the new recoups were made because some streets t hit more than 2 times....3,4 even 5 times.
I take your point - but that does not always happen, MOP...
Say we joined that street list I showed in the previous post a little earlier we might have the situation:
10-7-9-4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2 (qualifiers to bet: streets 9 and 11)
Next number is 33B (that's our 3rd 11 from the previous post list turning up)
So we DO or WOULD in fact have gotten a win on street 11 AT THAT POINT! And the list becomes:
7-9-4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11 (qualifiers to bet: street 9)
And as you have seen in the other post, MOP, the 9 street is going to hit for us in a couple of spins - another welcome win...
But of course you are free to play it as you see fit.
A.
Master_of_Pockets wrote:
Quote
They are 2 def methods....the one u mentioned is based only on sleepers ,while Atlantis is based on both sleepers and repeaters.
MOP is right with that. :)
A.
I tested with ur way atlantis...betting ONLY on the 2ice hit streets.
It couldn t recover in 182 spins and left a loss of -73 chips....a lot of streets hit 3-4 times....
sure this doesn t mean that my way is better than urs or the opposite,,,,i am just saying the expiriences from my testings
With this system, as with Profit Trickler, I would play using the JL methodology, (hee hee) - hit and run. I can see it as a fun system for small stakes and not go in too heavy - there are bets on most spins - you're not playing lots of chips - stick to flatbetting - easy to play and understand once you get the hang of the tracking etc..
That's what I'll be doing and I'm reasonably confident I'll know when to stop... Reckon I can win with this most times but would not play rng - just LIVE dealer or LIVE autospin or as sniper is doing at REAL casino.
Regards,
A.
Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 30, 06:21 PM 2012
I tested with your way atlantis...betting ONLY on the 2ice hit streets.
It couldn t recover in 182 spins and left a loss of -73 chips....a lot of streets hit 3-4 times....
sure this doesn't mean that my way is better than urs or the opposite,,,,i am just saying the expiriences from my testings
If it is the case that certain streets are hitting 3-4 times in the current string of 12 then the system will automatically be indicating less qualifiers and therefore reducing the # of bets to be made. There can be times when no bets are placed at all in such a scenario as that... MOP may have had a bad session. I personally would have ended before that kind of loss. I hate to use the dreaded phrase: "It works for me."
Anyhow, thanks for testing.
A.
Here is example in RX-style for Wiesbaden yesterday 30 Jun 2012, Table #2
1 4 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
2 33 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
3 34 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
4 8 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
5 36 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
6 29 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
7 6 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
8 12 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
9 7 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
10 10 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
11 5 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
12 33 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500 **12 numbers tracked here**
13 8 Bet 4 12 -4 8 508 "1 : (7-9),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
14 20 Bet 4 0 -4 -4 504 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
15 36 Bet 3 12 -3 9 513 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
16 9 Bet 3 0 -3 -3 510 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
17 11 Bet 3 12 -3 9 519 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
18 3 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 518 1 : (4-6)
19 1 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 517 1 : (4-6)
20 14 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 516 1 : (1-3)
21 26 Bet 2 0 -2 -2 514 "1 : (1-3),(10-12)"
22 28 Bet 3 0 -3 -3 511 "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(10-12)"
23 31 Bet 2 0 -2 -2 509 "1 : (1-3),(7-9)"
24 29 Bet 3 0 -3 -3 506 "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(31-33)"
25 1 Bet 3 12 -3 9 515 "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(28-30)"
26 16 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 514 1 : (28-30)
27 30 Bet 1 12 -1 11 525 1 : (28-30)
27 spins: Tracked 12 spins then +25 in 15 spins. (but could have quit after +8 on first bet)
A.
Quote from: atlantis on Jul 01, 03:06 AM 2012
Here is example in RX-style for Wiesbaden yesterday 30 Jun 2012, Table #2
1 4 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
2 33 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
3 34 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
4 8 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
5 36 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
6 29 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
7 6 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
8 12 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
9 7 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
10 10 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
11 5 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500
12 33 No Bet 0 0 0 0 500 **12 numbers tracked here**
13 8 Bet 4 12 -4 8 508 "1 : (7-9),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
14 20 Bet 4 0 -4 -4 504 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
15 36 Bet 3 12 -3 9 513 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
16 9 Bet 3 0 -3 -3 510 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
17 11 Bet 3 12 -3 9 519 "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
18 3 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 518 1 : (4-6)
19 1 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 517 1 : (4-6)
20 14 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 516 1 : (1-3)
21 26 Bet 2 0 -2 -2 514 "1 : (1-3),(10-12)"
22 28 Bet 3 0 -3 -3 511 "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(10-12)"
23 31 Bet 2 0 -2 -2 509 "1 : (1-3),(7-9)"
24 29 Bet 3 0 -3 -3 506 "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(31-33)"
25 1 Bet 3 12 -3 9 515 "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(28-30)"
26 16 Bet 1 0 -1 -1 514 1 : (28-30)
27 30 Bet 1 12 -1 11 525 1 : (28-30)
27 spins: Tracked 12 spins then +25 in 15 spins. (but could have quit after +8 on first bet)
A.
Nice run Atlantis. I would quit as well after a first hit. Funny thing that playing my system i would get also a early win after 11 hit in spin 17. It completed 4th street (10,12 hit b4) :D
I would bet on missing number in 3rd n 12th street and also in 2nd street where i would get an additional win after 5 hit in spin 11 (4,6 hit b4). I would probably shut down after that but f i kept betting 30 hit on spin 27 4 another win completing street 10 after 28 n 29 hit b4.
Maybe we should combine both methods ;D
Regards
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 01, 03:33 AM 2012
Nice run Atlantis. I would quit as well after a first hit. Funny thing that playing my system i would get also a early win after 11 hit in spin 17. It completed 4th street (10,12 hit b4) :D
I would bet on missing number in 3rd n 12th street and also in 2nd street where i would get an additional win after 5 hit in spin 11 (4,6 hit b4).
That's interesting. I suppose there's bound to be some sort of similar crossover logic or criteria happening during play... Spin 28 would have been a "no bet" on mine as no street was showing twice at that point.
The main thing is if it can win regularly, that is what counts in the end. Obviously if these kinds of methods don't deliver they will soon be abandoned. I will not allow myself to suffer continuous losing games and would soon be moving on in such an eventuality .. ;)
A.
Quote from: atlantis on Jul 01, 03:46 AM 2012
That's interesting. I suppose there's bound to be some sort of similar crossover logic or criteria happening during play... Spin 28 would have been a "no bet" on mine as no street was showing twice at that point.
The main thing is if it can win regularly, that is what counts in the end. Obviously if these kinds of methods don't deliver they will soon be abandoned. I will not allow myself to suffer continuous losing games and will soon be moving on .. ;)
A.
Yeah. As i mentioned b4 they r both similar methods. I just bet on single numbers n do continuous tracking within 12-15 spins. Its just one of d methods that i feel u can push. F wins it wins big but of course it will lose from time 2 time.
Atlantis, I'm testing this system using my pamphlet from Casino de Macao with 20,000 continuous spins on a single zero wheel. I got bogged down on the very first try. Here are the 1st numbers, will you play them and see where you end up:
34
25
20
23
22
23
9
4
17
29
33
27
1
19
1
36
12
4
4
20
34
16
1
13
26
18
34
13
30
9
33
16
11
29
36
31
3
11
1
20
22
25
28
0
32
0
15
25
3
13
26
34
16
11
0
11
6
22
26
14
23
6
10
20
30
27
21
33
1
15
5
11
26
14
That's 1-74, I ran out of time at #13 which is the 50th spin. I was at -30 having been as low as -65. Would you mind playing them to see if I'm doing it per your method.
Thanks,
GLC
Hi George,
I have tested them in the Roulette Xtreme software.
Loss of -67 after the 74 spins. That's the first bad result I've come across. Certainly food for thought. And I've continued to have 4 good sessions today with nothing less than +30 each time! Horrible numbers for it to deal with... Still, there is always something to learn and I know I would have quit before that full loss. I've been thinking about a stop/loss of something like 35units - and I know not all sessions will be like that one, GLC.
A.
Hello atlantis.
Let me remind you that in order for a stop loss to be working , the system must be able to always recoup in a long run test without stop losses.
Atlantis,
I know that this system has a decent strike rate. Sometimes I think you contact me to help test because you know that one of my first tests will find a string of spins from the hot place. Had these not been the 1st 74 numbers in my booklet, I think FL or someone has the same pamphlet to verify the spins are authentic. Came with the book "Roulette for the Millions".
Okay, so I'm probably doing it right. That's all I wanted to know. Unfortunately, I have to do everything by hand since I'm not that good with spreadsheets. I'll try another sequence later. Maybe a 35 units win target and a 35 unit stop loss.
Moving forward with a full 30" step.
GLC
Here's the next 74 numbers.
11
15
9
13
24
5
34
20
4
6
13
0
26
4
3
26
29
33
32
35
11
7
30
2
21
19
17
32
27
26
11
9
29
8
16
8
25
18
30
18
9
13
26
8
2
6
14
5
24
8
9
26
17
23
27
21
13
2
22
36
26
24
17
27
6
34
4
8
4
2
24
16
35
14
Quote from: GLC on Jul 01, 04:55 PM 2012
Atlantis,
I know that this system has a decent strike rate. Sometimes I think you contact me to help test because you know that one of my first tests will find a string of spins from the hot place. Had these not been the 1st 74 numbers in my booklet, I think FL or someone has the same pamphlet to verify the spins are authentic. Came with the book "Roulette for the Millions".
Okay, so I'm probably doing it right. That's all I wanted to know. Unfortunately, I have to do everything by hand since I'm not that good with spreadsheets. I'll try another sequence later. Maybe a 35 units win target and a 35 unit stop-loss.
Moving forward with a full 30" step.
GLC
Hello George
I think that other option that could work maybe better would be 2 track continuously looking 4 qualifiers that hit within last 12-15 spins n bet them as soon as they qualify 4 12 spins. In this way u would take advantage of early multiple hits. In yr last set u would get 2 winners within first 12 spins when 6 n 13 hit bk 2 bk 4 16u win. In a first set u would get a winner after 23 hit in 6th spin and again after 4 hit bk 2 bk. I know that in other sets d results may favor an original version ;D
Regards
I had rough session playing by my rules. I was down 32u, recovered 2 +6u due 2 4 wins in 5 spins n went down again 2 -36u having had 14 consecutive losses n stopped there. Both versions r very streaky. :D Sorry Atlantis for interrupting yr thread a bit.
Quote from: GLC on Jul 01, 05:37 PM 2012
Here's the next 74 numbers.
Hi George,
I'll check em and let u know. I'm busy/out today but will do so later this afternoon/evening and report back.
Regards, Atlantis.
Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 02, 02:25 AM 2012
I had rough session playing by my rules. I was down 32u, recovered 2 +6u due 2 4 wins in 5 spins n went down again 2 -36u having had 14 consecutive losses n stopped there. Both versions r very streaky. :D Sorry Atlantis for interrupting yr thread a bit.
I don’t read robeenhuut’s posts anymore because he persists with using short text language.
Sure he saves microseconds when typing, but we all spend extra minutes figuring out what he’s saying.
RIPPED OFF!
You owe me lifetime minutes RH.
perhaps he uses smartphone instead of computer?
"""""Sure he saves microseconds when typing, but we all spend extra minutes figuring out what he’s saying.""""""
Hahahaha Sooooooooooooo funny! :D
Hey Skakus
Ingles is yr first language? It does not matter. U 2 lazy 2 read it no problemo.
Hasta la vista. ;D By d way English is my 3rd language n I'm 2 lazy 2 use it properly.
I could provide a dictionary 4 u but give me a one good reason why i should bother.
Sante
Hi Atlantis this looks a bit special, Lines and Streets are the only inside bets worth getting involved with, Ive got a lot on my plate at the Mo, But I will defo look into this soon, Dont worry about doubting Thomas's like MOP and Hutt, We need them to make the forum balanced, Take it from me a year from now, many people on this forum will think with more open minds, The mission starts later,
--Yes John beatting wheel is very simple and easy.....
BUT not playing each spin,that might be impossible
mission.
Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 02, 09:14 AM 2012
Hi Atlantis this looks a bit special, Lines and Streets are the only inside bets worth getting involved with, I've got a lot on my plate at the Mo, But I will definitely look into this soon, don't worry about doubting Thomas's like MOP and Hutt, We need them to make the forum balanced, Take it from me a year from now, many people on this forum will think with more open minds, The mission starts later,
Hehe John
I'm not a doubting Thomas considering this system. :D Just read my earlier posts. Atlantis n myself just had one bad session here but also few good ones. I did not dismiss it yet. N how about betting on numbers in inside bets?
Anyway thanks 4 anybody who takes extra few seconds 2 digest my posts. I know they r mostly rubbish :D
Hi GLC,
Here is result of your second list of numbers:
+9u profit in 74 spins (highest bank = +18u profit; lowest bank = -32u)
Regards,
A.
Quote from: atlantis on Jul 02, 01:45 PM 2012
Hi GLC,
Here is result of your second list of numbers:
+9u profit in 74 spins (highest bank = +18u profit; lowest bank = -32u)
Regards,
A.
Thanks A. I'm going to test them myself to make sure I get the same results. That will show that I'm doing it correctly.
We did go from -32 to +18 at one point. That's a pretty nice run. It shows that recovering 70 plus units isn't that difficult.
Just completed my third winning session for real money +30 units achieved in 33 spins (includes 12 tracked numbers) bringing my total so far after 3 sessions to +99u.
So far have avoided to hit really bad sequence. :twisted:
A.
To answer a question........
That "alert" program was written by KonFuSed, a brilliant math guy. Too bad we lost him.
Sam
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jul 03, 12:47 AM 2012
To answer a question........
That "alert" program was written by KonFuSed, a brilliant math guy. Too bad we lost him.
Sam
Hi Sam,
Yes that Alert program OR the RX (street results for last 12 numbers graph) is really great and can be used for easy tracking and identifying the qualifiers when playing LIVE ONLINE (you just don't enter the zeroes when they happen) It's then VERY easy to see which streets to bet or not bet.
However, if IMPORTING spin files that contain zeroes for testing purposes (e.g.: Wiesbaden or other spin .txt files) into either of these programs then the 0's will be counted in the last 12 spin result data, which is what you don't want...
I personally prefer the RX block graph - Once you've got the first 12 results keyed in it is *so easy* to update and then quickly and reliably check which streets are to be bet - a lot better than handwritten testing which is time consuming and prone to various errors or blunders especially if you're pushed for time.
Cheers,
A.