I see if we bet 2 on an EC and lose we lose two.
If we win we win two simple.
If we the bet one, we lose on or win one.
The two bets if both win we win three
if start with the 2 bet if second lose we win one
If first lose the loss is allways two, because we start all over.
If we bet one first, and lose, we lose one
If we win we win one
If we next bet stake two, we lose 2, but have one winnings from previous loss is one.
If we win both we have three plus.
It looks all over as it is better to start with two, if we win first we will not lose.
I think it may be wrong, we lose one if the first bet lose, and we win one if we win.
The second bet lost means we lost one.
Its looks like we lose less if we start with two, many "system" can show this.
If we do it opposite it looks like we are not guarantied to get plus if we lose the second.
I think it may not matter, if you lose the first, and bet one, it is half the loss as the other bet.
May it even be worse to start with two?
We know we win about half the trials.
Some talks of betting may just fool us.