Is anybody still studying Dyksexlics clues?
If so, could I study with them?
No, I’m not Dyksexlic unless he’s relocated to South Africa ;D
Regards
brucenelson@webmail.co.za
Howzit ek se, nah, Me and Vicotr did give it a bash a few years ago, I still have the code I coded but it eventually gets too risky, hence I did not follow it much further, tried a few different approaches but it didn't do what it said on the blik so it's been filed.
Hi Badger . . .
I looked into Dyksexlic about a year ago.
Will contact you via email and see if any of my studies can help you.
Cheers
Nick
I don't remember what Dyksexlic's puzzle was, but I have a series of clues written down in my notes from a few years ago.
It's supposed to be the clues to the Holy Grail. Here they are.
1. It's a 4 bet combo
2. Not all the bets are even chance bets,but all the bets are outside bets. (No streets)
3. There is at least 1 column
4. You have 16 winners that pay 2 units
5. You have 16 losers of on 1 unit
6. You have 4 losers of 4 units
7. See if you can predict when the losers are coming
8. Betting 2 columns & 2 dozens you can find a trigger based on the last spin or the penultimate spin
9. Betting 3 before last on an even chance might be helpful.
I'm not sure that numbers 7, 8 & 9 aren't decoys to throw us off.
All I've got to say is if we ever get #7, game over. We win with any system if we can do this.
That's all I've got and I don't remember where it came from. I don't know any more than what I wrote above, so I can't really answer any questions.
Maybe if some of you guys who have a doctorate in roulette can work together and see if there's anything here.
GLC
@Superman : Hoeziiit
@GLC : Wow, I have’nt seen any of those clues before!
I’m not trying to start a discussion of Dyksexlics bet as we all know how
that’s going to end.
I’m trying to meet forum members who think that Dyksexlic has a HG and would like to solve it . I enjoy solving puzzles.
My opinion of Dyksexlic is that he is articulate, has a higher education, probably in maths, and has a very sharp mind. Unfortunately, as Babs once wrote, he has a burden to prove himself to his naysayers, rather than to those who are interested in his methods.
I understand his choice of not wanting to reveal his method. After all, if one could pick gold up in the streets, it would have no value, would it. One only has to look at the game of blackjack and what Thorpe’s book did to those who used card counting as a living.
I think that many people misunderstand his clues. For example : many people think that his system uses a progression until it hits a repeater , but he clearly states that he is not waiting for an event, he’s method is a process.
Regards
Bruce
Quote from: GLC on May 19, 12:57 AM 2013
I don't remember what Dyksexlic's puzzle was, but I have a series of clues written down in my notes from a few years ago.
It's supposed to be the clues to the Holy Grail. Here they are.
1. It's a 4 bet combo
2. Not all the bets are even chance bets,but all the bets are outside bets. (No streets)
3. There is at least 1 column
4. You have 16 winners that pay 2 units
5. You have 16 losers of on 1 unit
6. You have 4 losers of 4 units
7. See if you can predict when the losers are coming
8. Betting 2 columns & 2 dozens you can find a trigger based on the last spin or the penultimate spin
9. Betting 3 before last on an even chance might be helpful.
I'm not sure that numbers 7, 8 & 9 aren't decoys to throw us off.
All I've got to say is if we ever get #7, game over. We win with any system if we can do this.
That's all I've got and I don't remember where it came from. I don't know any more than what I wrote above, so I can't really answer any questions.
Maybe if some of you guys who have a doctorate in roulette can work together and see if there's anything here.
GLC
[/quote
According to all that,may guess would be;
Col.1+2+red+high
Col.1+3+black+low
Just playing the advocate here...........
Did he ever show one shred of proof that he could do anything?
Sam
@ Teo, I've thought about your suggestion and it doesn't satisfy all the criteria. Meaning the 16 numbers that win 2 units, 16 numbers lose 1 unit and 4 number win 4 units. Betting on 2 dozens and 2 columns satisfy the criteria if you're playing on a no-zero wheel. But if you're playing on a single zero wheel, then you will have 5 numbers that lose 4 units.
It could be that we have to bet different size bets on the different bet locations.
I have a feeling this is an exercise in futility if he has to throw in #7 as a caveat.
Thanks for giving us your thoughts though. Any idea might supply the element that leads to the solution.
@ Sam. The answer to your question is, "I don't think he did." As my memory drifts in and out of being trustworthy, I seem to remember that this was posed by a guy named Charles. Seems like there was a lot of controversy a few years back regarding his claims on his web site about being able to beat roulette.
GLC
“Did he ever show one shred of proof that he could do anything?â€
The only way he could prove anything would be to reveal the bet to another forum member, who could then verify the facts.
He obviously did not trust anyone.
I still think â€there’s gold in them thar hills†;D
He could do as I have done: Make a movie showing only the Euro amount at the casino. He could play in complete secrecy, but we could see the Euro amount constantly going up.
People......
Really, all we need to see is that a person can make money! Just show us the Euro screen! If he could do what he says he could do, he would be happy to show us 100 E going to 200, then 400, then 800 and so on.
But, challenged, most folks say, "Oh, I can't play on line." Or, "Oh, BetVoyager cheats!"
Folks, Leo Kottke did not spend years learning guitar to say, "Oh, it's windy out! I can't play." Google "Vaseline Machine Gun" and listen to it.
Ok, I'm bloviating! Sorry....
TwoCat
By the way.......for those who say, "I don't have to prove anything to anyone.", then why open your mouth in the first place? This guys been gone for ages and we're still talking about him. He's probably on here now under a new name.
That's another thing: I'm TwoCatSam all over the net. Not one other name. Why does everyone need a basket load of names?
The "Darn Near Holy Grail" is on these forums. It loses sometimes, but it makes money. Over time, it makes money! Not one thing to do with me, I'm sorry to say!
Oops!! There I go again....
Samster
As I recall he was actually john legend/fender using yet another fake name. Notice the same pattern he followed? Loves to string people along for amusement. You will only waste time with him, but you're free to try.
Quote from: Steve on May 19, 06:29 PM 2013
As I recall he was actually john legend/fender using yet another fake name. Notice the same pattern he followed? Loves to string people along for amusement. You will only waste time with him, but you're free to try.
As I recall diksukmy was way more clever than JL/fender, more like greatgrampa. :twisted:
Skakus
Some clariication: Are you lumping GG into the same class as Jl/Fender/dykitchy?
Surely not.
Sam
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 19, 01:25 PM 2013
He could do as I have done: Make a movie showing only the Euro amount at the casino. He could play in complete secrecy, but we could see the Euro amount constantly going up.
TwoCat
Sam,
But he did something else instead/probably you aren't aware since you were guitar playing/opened
new web site,and scam ppl.for over 400 k to join his club of winners.
@ teo
Where on earth did you get that 400k figure from please ?
O0
--I didn't but other ppl.estimated so on those forums...especially
scammed ones....according to them it was about 800 euros to
become a member of the winning club x 500 ppl....he was planning
doing it for more then 5 years.....that is a real sign of pro conman.
teo
No, I didn't know that. I'm amazed, shocked and appalled.
Bet he keeps a low profile!! KnowwhutImean?
Sam
thxs for answering my question Teo :thumbsup:
I know people who applied think it was about 350 euros ish...
How about a different slant on this ?
I have no insider knowledge or anything like that, this is only a possibility.....
For starters, the fee was to apply to the club, not to become a member. Therefore like it or not, I don't think he has done anything illegal.
His Uk (not a ropey off shore acc) was on the website, if he has conned people no doubt somebody would have gone all the way & reported him.
May the club does exist & the best way for the trail to go cold, is to let EVERYBODY think he's a conman ???
I have no idea, it's just a possibility......
O0
Hello everyone! : )
Take a look at the first post in this link....... #35
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=profile;u=731;area=showposts;start=30 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=profile;u=731;area=showposts;start=30)
I wished there were more clues.
Have you read all his posts Proof, quite fascinating if nothing else.
Take a look at post #14......
looking at those posts he sure comes across as Wendal.... :( :( :( :(
O0
Let me try this.
Track until you have collected either 10 low unique or 10 high unique
numbers since the start of the session. (Whichever comes first during tracking.)
Of those 10 low (or high) numbers count how many are even
or odd. The lesser of the two will be your playing numbers.
Here's the pigeonhole part. Bet each playing number continuously as it shows (waker).
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(That was my best shot)*hope it helps :)
Hello d darko (cool name : )
Vic could confirm the IP addresses O0
That's amazing stuff Proof.
A major development/advancement into understanding this concept.
I think we are chipping away at the riddle....
There is a chance, 50/50 (without the zero : ) that Dyksexlic is actually correct.....
@ amk thxs it's a cool film 8) & yes maybe vic could.....
@ Proof
IF there is a bet out there I'm 100% sure it's a simple one, & what you posted is sure simple so who knows ???
O0
I'd really love to have that "pigeon hole" thingy explained fully.
I know two pigeons can't get on the same egg, but what does that have to do with where the ball lands.
Is he saying the ball can't land twice in the same spot? We all know better than that!
Sam
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 22, 04:39 PM 2013
I'd really love to have that "pigeon hole" thingy explained fully.
If you have 9 holes and 10 pigeons, you know a pigeon will enter a hole which is already occupied:
(link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=13003.0;attach=14491;image)
It doesn't correlate
directly to roulette since you have 37 holes and only one pigeon (ball) :)
Then the other way is to try to "force-fit" it into roulette using an analogy instead; the 37 holes being 37 spins... This way, by spin #38 you have 100% certainty the ball must have fallen into a pocket (hole) twice.
It's pretty much like you having a pajama with two (2) pockets and me wagering that should you stick your hand 3 times in your pajama's pockets, you will repeat one of the pockets
for sure ::)
You can be 100% certain of that :)
For starters, the fee was to apply to the club, not to become a member.
I tend to agree with you ddarko.
Dyksexlic and CEH are 2 different people.
CEH claimed to have a consistant winning bet and and he would never play RNG.
Dyksexlic has a 100% winning bet played only on RNG.
Quote from: Badger on May 22, 04:58 PM 2013
Dyksexlic and CEH are 2 different people.
I interacted with both. They did seem like different brains :)
Can you predict a spin result with any better than random accuracy? Thats the question.
The pigeon thingy probably refers to the law of a third, where 1/3rd of spins are repeats. Thats just probability. Can you determine which will be repeats, with better than random accuracy? No. FAIL.
Expected is different than probability, the last will never be 100%. We hit the red near about 50%, which is the expected, so it means we hit with 200% in four spins, the probability is between 0 and 4 times. ;D
We can hit less than or more than probability or expected. The systems or skills are about 5% of the success, the rest is luck.
Some count with averages, which is of no use, if the ball lands on the numbers we bet, we win, and it can happen using a method/system. It can make us win more often, but it needs a a lot of luck winning a lot in long play.
If you think numbers can repeat, you are better of than think it never happens, so some experience of the game is useful, otherwise it is not a skill game. If cheating not is called skill.
I think I have something workable. It is "Loosely" based on Dyke's notes:
Procedure: Track until you have collected either seven low unique or seven high unique numbers since the start of the session. (Whichever comes first during tracking.)
Of those seven low (or high) numbers count how many are even
or odd. The lesser of the two will be your playing numbers.
Stop on a win or a drawdown of -36 units per one unit bet.
*Here are the tests: link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13050.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13050.0)
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on May 23, 02:29 AM 2013
I think I have something workable. It is "Loosely" based on Dyke's notes:
Procedure: Track until you have collected either seven low unique or seven high unique numbers since the start of the session. (Whichever comes first during tracking.)
Of those seven low (or high) numbers count how many are even
or odd. The lesser of the two will be your playing numbers.
Stop on a win or a drawdown of -36 units per one unit bet.
*Here are the tests: link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13050.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13050.0)
It is worth trying, I should not the lesser of the two.
Quote from: Ralph on May 23, 03:21 AM 2013
It is worth trying, I should not the lesser of the two.
I found out the lesser number of Odd or Even uniques has a better hit rate.
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on May 23, 09:56 AM 2013
I found out the lesser number of Odd or Even uniques has a better hit rate.
Maybe