#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Main Roulette Board => Topic started by: Chrisbis on May 18, 03:39 PM 2013

Title: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Chrisbis on May 18, 03:39 PM 2013
Should the member "Ignatus" be given his own section?


In view of the abundant number of ideas, methods and systems this member is posting,
I suggest a New Section called:-


Professor Ignatus Methods.


contained inside the Personal Section.


Anyone care to second the motion?
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: warrior on May 18, 03:56 PM 2013
second
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on May 18, 04:04 PM 2013
third
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 18, 04:05 PM 2013
Quote from: Chrisbis on May 18, 03:39 PM 2013
Should the member "Ignatus" be given his own section?


In view of the abundant number of ideas, methods and systems this member is posting,
I suggest a New Section called:-


Professor Ignatus Methods.


contained inside the Personal Section.


Anyone care to second the motion?


lol  ;D
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Turner on May 18, 04:11 PM 2013
No...i dont. Hes not spoiling my little club. Its a forum.
However....i dont think the ideas are strong enough or radical enough to intetest a lot of old pros in here. They should be in note pad or testing....but ive said this 1000 times and he doesnt listen
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: superman on May 18, 04:13 PM 2013
Yes brilliant idea, we can set a section to ignore can't we?
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 18, 04:18 PM 2013
Ohhh,.. the "pros" are speaking! This is something great. Well, sure, the "testing zone" ey? I don't know what to say ... your "professonalism" suck. You know? All Strategies here fail ? haha.. what's the point? I posted several system that can work, or cannot work... what can I say? Some work, some do not, some need improvements? Hey? you "pros" share your "wisdom" then if you are so smart, instead of complaining.


That's just stupid.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Turner on May 18, 04:57 PM 2013
Sometimes honesty is best. I personally am fed up with your endless unfinished ideas. Why dont you see anything through to the end? It shouldnt be posted until its tested for weeks. Ill be honest here. I went to vics to gey away from it....and the exact same posts are there from u. Cant escape. Why post them there too. I just dont get it. I post once a month, if that when i thiink i have something new that the oldest of pros havnt quite thought of.
I wouldnt insult the forums intellegence posting old faded ideas that make people groan when they read them.
I wouldnt attack u personally. Im just judging what u type against other posts.
No offence intended
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 18, 05:05 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on May 18, 04:57 PM 2013
Sometimes honesty is best. I personally am fed up with your endless unfinished ideas. Why don't you see anything through to the end? It shouldnt be posted until its tested for weeks. Ill be honest here. I went to vics to gey away from it....and the exact same posts are there from u. can't escape. Why post them there too. I just don't get it. I post once a month, if that when i thiink i have something new that the oldest of pros havnt quite thought of.
I wouldnt insult the forums intellegence posting old faded ideas that make people groan when they read them.
I wouldnt attack u personally. I'm just judging what u type against other posts.
No offence intended


I post any strategy when*I* think it's clever, from my level of understanding and my experience. Now, I still don't think the argument is good, try give some advice and opinions about the strategy, HOW it can be improved, or point out the flaws. How are we *ever* going to learn otherwise? This forum is for sharing ideas, at what level of experience anyone has. That's my opinion.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Smoczoor on May 18, 05:11 PM 2013
This man invented a system by which I earned 20,000 units so stop talking about any sections for him...
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 18, 05:18 PM 2013
Quote from: Smoczoor on May 18, 05:11 PM 2013
This man invented a system by which I earned 20,000 units so stop talking about any sections for him...


:ooh:  Thanks. Smoczoor....
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: vundarosa on May 18, 06:54 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on May 18, 04:18 PM 2013
Ohhh,.. the "pros" are speaking! This is something great. Well, sure, the "testing zone" ey? I don't know what to say ... your "professonalism" suck. You know? All Strategies here fail ? haha.. what's the point? I posted several system that can work, or cannot work... what can I say? Some work, some do not, some need improvements? Hey? you "pros" share your "wisdom" then if you are so smart, instead of complaining.


That's just silly.

----------------
care to elaborate on one of them?!

vundarosa
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 18, 07:02 PM 2013
Quote from: vundarosa on May 18, 06:54 PM 2013

----------------
care to elaborate on one of them?!

vundarosa


link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12656.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12656.0)


link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13001.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13001.0)


link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12988.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12988.0)


link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12994.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12994.0)


link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12978.0 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12978.0)


I would say, all of those work, that's the best picks I can figure right now. Play them and report back your results.


Thank you.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: iggiv on May 18, 09:38 PM 2013
i asked Ignatus to place his stuff in notepad, but instead he places it somewhere else and then keeps bombarding mods with messages asking to remove them. I just don't get it. He probably thinks that i take immense pleasure in removing or moving his messages. or he probably thinks that i have nothing else to do in my life. it's getting ridiculous already.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: maestro on May 18, 09:57 PM 2013
he has to change his dealer first{not roulette dealer} because i think that stafffff he gets is not good....... :xd: :xd: :xd: :xd: :xd: :xd: :xd:
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: iggiv on May 18, 09:59 PM 2013
LOL...or maybe his stuff is too good
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Skakus on May 18, 11:46 PM 2013
Yes he should.

Please call it, "Ignortus This Section"  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Ralph on May 19, 01:01 AM 2013
We can compress all his ideas!


Bet at any place any numbers of numbers. Progress hard negative, and if you win first time, publish it as a winner.
First time you lose reject it, and do someting similar.


All such methods can win, no doubt, but a heavy loss is more likely.


He is not alone, in an other forum, it is 1345 different inventors of Martingale, and a lot of posts on the net looks the same.
I may have post some of this too.


I would recommend him to post at a pokerforum, all the answers are 100% predictable, and a genius would quote Einstein, an other Wizards of Odds, the forum dialogue are much more predictable than the game.  I think Ignatius could even earn money selling his findings, as many try, do not have anything better.
.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 19, 04:32 AM 2013
You know? I'm trying the best I can. Really. And I'm sad, all my effort seems to be wasted, since you don't appreciate any of my systems, obviously....


And again, why don't you come with suggestions how the system in question can be IMPROVED, point of the weak points, give suggestions how it can be done better?


I think this complaining is just bad.


It's your bad, because i said , I'm doing the best i can.....  :(
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: teo on May 19, 05:11 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on May 19, 04:32 AM 2013
You know? I'm trying the best I can. Really. And I'm sad, all my effort seems to be wasted, since you don't appreciate any of my systems, obviously....


And again, why don't you come with suggestions how the system in question can be IMPROVED, point of the weak points, give suggestions how it can be done better?


I think this complaining is just bad.


It's your bad, because i said , I'm doing the best i can.....  :(


Well said Ignatus........as any of your base ideas CAN BE tweaked and improved,played in many diff.
ways/as any other basical bet/and it is up to the reader how to accept it.Mostly they abandon the
original idea/testing it on trillion spins,as if they would/could ever play it thatway,without any further investigations.....as all such testers will remain negative cause no method/system ever created could become as a winner....THATWAY.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 19, 06:01 AM 2013
Quote from: teo on May 19, 05:11 AM 2013

Well said Ignatus........as any of your base ideas CAN BE tweaked and improved,played in many diff.
ways/as any other basical bet/and it is up to the reader how to accept it.Mostly they abandon the
original idea/testing it on trillion spins,as if they would/could ever play it thatway,without any further investigations.....as all such testers will remain negative cause no method/system ever created could become as a winner....THATWAY.


Thanks teo...
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: rossco on May 19, 07:09 AM 2013
  With total respect to Ignatus, there has to be some good ideas. Just so many, it would be great if they were all in one place. Have to agree.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on May 19, 08:37 AM 2013
Well said Teo  :thumbsup: 

At least Ignatus is generous with his ideas,
not like the (I have a Grail and I won't tell types).
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Badger on May 19, 08:47 AM 2013
 Hi Ignatus

I’ve only come across 3 claimed Holy Grails.
Bob’s bet on the old VLS forum
Charles scammer Hampshires bet 
Dyksexlics bet

Why don’t you focus all your creative energy on
1 of those bets. Who knows, if you solve the riddle,
the payoff could be rewarding.
I would not post my attempts at solving the above
on the forums though, as you would most probably
p1ss even more people off.

If you want more details, you could contact me.
Regards
Bruce
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 19, 08:53 AM 2013
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on May 19, 08:37 AM 2013
Well said Teo  :thumbsup: 

At least he is generous with his ideas, not
like the (I have a Grail and I won't tell types).


You are kind Proof, yes, you have a good character. Thanks. :)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 19, 09:49 AM 2013
Call it "Ignatusville"

"Wastin' away in Iggy-natus-ville,
Looking for my lost ho-Holy Grail.
Some people claim that Roulette is to blame,
But I know
It's my fear I will fail."

(Don't sue, Jimmy!)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 19, 10:06 AM 2013
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 19, 09:49 AM 2013
Call it "Ignatusville"

"Wastin' away in Iggy-natus-ville,
Looking for my lost ho-Holy Grail.
Some people claim that Roulette is to blame,
But I know
It's my fear I will fail."

(Don't sue, Jimmy!)


I don't get the irony or the joke here, Sam. But this is obviously another attempt to ridicule me. Stop that, all. Just don't... Start participating and contribute with something yourself instead of complaining.


I have a new system, in notepad "A different Kind of Monster" -it's basically a doubledozen bet, but with a different kind of betselection...


I think this system should be an official strategy, because I've tested it, and it works very well.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Badger on May 19, 10:53 AM 2013
 Hi Ignatus

Sam’s just having some fun. His poem is based on the song Margaritaville by Jimmy Buffett.
We’ve all been where you are. I just think you should channel all your creative energy into one thing, instead of jumping around all over the place.
When you first started posting I thought you were my younger ( by 15 years) brother who also lives in Sweden. ( Who also used to like herbs  ;) )
We're all rootin for yah.

regards
Bruce
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ddarko on May 19, 12:04 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on May 19, 10:06 AM 2013

I don't get the irony or the joke here, Sam. But this is obviously another attempt to ridicule me. Stop that, all. Just don't...

For somebody who smokes a lotta weed, you sure are sensitive......

to quote another song.....

"Just because your paranoid don't mean they,re not after you"

O0
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 19, 01:39 PM 2013
Quote from: ddarko on May 19, 12:04 PM 2013
For somebody who smokes a lotta weed, you sure are sensitive......

to quote another song.....

"Just because your paranoid don't mean they,re not after you"

O0

Now, there's the truth.

One more:

"Ate me some gumbo...
Tasted just so-so..
Been in the 'fridge since the week before last.
Now my belly's a-churnin..
A-tossin' and turnin'
That horrible feeling; Lord let it be gas!

Wastin' away again in DirrehaVille
Looking' for my lost roll of two-ply.
Some people say I'll get better some day.
I don't know.  Lord, I just want to die."

Ignatus

Lighten up, Bro.  It's all in fun.  Actually, I have quite a bit of respect for you!

TwoCat
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 19, 02:11 PM 2013
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 19, 01:39 PM 2013
Now, there's the truth.

One more:

"Ate me some gumbo...
Tasted just so-so..
Been in the 'fridge since the week before last.
Now my belly's a-churnin..
A-tossin' and turnin'
That horrible feeling; Lord let it be gas!

Wastin' away again in DirrehaVille
Looking' for my lost roll of two-ply.
Some people say I'll get better some day.
I don't know.  Lord, I just want to die."

Ignatus

Lighten up, Bro.  It's all in fun.  Actually, I have quite a bit of respect for you!

TwoCat


Thanks Sam!  ;D
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: teo on May 19, 03:04 PM 2013
Quote from: Badger on May 19, 08:47 AM 2013
Hi Ignatus

I’ve only come across 3 claimed Holy Grails.
Bob’s bet on the old VLS forum
Charles scammer Hampshires bet 
Dyksexlics bet

Why don’t you focus all your creative energy on
1 of those bets. Who knows, if you solve the riddle,
the payoff could be rewarding.
I would not post my attempts at solving the above
on the forums though, as you would most probably
p1ss even more people off.

If you want more details, you could contact me.
Regards
Bruce


--Who is the Bob ?????
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Badger on May 19, 03:18 PM 2013
Hi Teo
On the old VLS forum, a member by the name of Simon, posted 2 emails from an old man by the name of Bob.
He claimed to have found a way to exploit the distribution of columns on the American Wheel.
I dont know what happened to Simon, but his posts can be found here.
link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?board=148.0 (link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?board=148.0)
Regards
Bruce
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Badger on May 19, 03:28 PM 2013
I left 1 HG out.
At RouletteRaped.com, an old man desribes how he found the HG.
Interesting reading. If anyone knows of more kindly let me know.
You could say I'm an investigator of paranormal occurences :xd:
Actually, I just enjoy a good mystery or riddle.
Regards
Bruce
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 19, 05:56 PM 2013
On the 00 wheel, second column, there is a very good sector layout.

When I get to be an "Old Fogey", maybe I'll look into it further.

Sam, the Geezer
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: iggiv on May 19, 07:26 PM 2013
Why i don't want Ignatus to have his section? because usually we have sections for some folks which know their stuff more or less and don't publish things like "bet cold with progression". If every newbie with some old classic gambler fallacy ideas has his own section it won't do very good for this board.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 19, 07:36 PM 2013
Quote from: iggiv on May 19, 07:26 PM 2013
Why i don't want Ignatus to have his section? because usually we have sections for some folks which know their stuff more or less and don't publish things like "bet cold with progression". If every newbie with some old classic gambler fallacy ideas has his own section it won't do very good for this board.


I don't even want to have my own section, Look at Proofreaders2000, he's got billions of strategies, but hardly any get any attention, that a shame, he deserve more attention. Anway, sure, ALL my strategies may not be "perfect" but this is roulette, what IS perfect in roulette ?


Nothing is perfect in roulette, and randomness is a b i t c h. OK, still I *TRY* to figure out something that can get an advantage etc....


And furthermore, I think the moderators should stop complaining, this is also something *I* said over and over, point out the weakness and give ideas of improvements instead ?


So, you don't like negative progression, so what ? What are the options ? Hey.... I don't think there are many options. Give examples of some other progressions that would work better?.... don't think they exist.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on May 19, 07:56 PM 2013
Look at Proofreaders2000, he's got billions of strategies, but hardly any
get any attention, that a shame, he deserve more attention.--Ignatus

I get enough attention as it is.  Casino agents are on high alert  :D 

By the way you are welcome to come and say hi :)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 19, 08:04 PM 2013
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on May 19, 07:56 PM 2013
Look at Proofreaders2000, he's got billions of strategies, but hardly any
get any attention, that a shame, he deserve more attention.--Ignatus

I get enough attention as it is.  Casino agents are on high alert  :D 

By the way you are welcome to come and say hi :)


I will, i've read your archives with strategies, they are the best. (your section of this forum)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Ralph on May 20, 12:13 AM 2013
Quote from: iggiv on May 19, 07:26 PM 2013
Why i don't want Ignatus to have his section? because usually we have sections for some folks which know their stuff more or less and don't publish things like "bet cold with progression". If every newbie with some old classic gambler fallacy ideas has his own section it won't do very good for this board.




Yes I thought the special sections purpose not was to  sort out postings, rather for selected contributors.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 20, 12:37 AM 2013
Quote from: Ralph on May 20, 12:13 AM 2013



Yes I thought the special sections purpose not was to  sort out postings, rather for selected contributors.


I agree, I do not consider myself a "roulette expert". Roulette is one of my hobbies. And inventing strategies, playing roulette. But this is a learning process. I learn everyday. Still I haven't read much about "advanced" strategies, and advanced roulette philosophy, like iggiv would suggest... Perhaps I will do one day, until then, you have to put up with my "lame" strategies. lol... ;D
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: superman on May 20, 02:56 AM 2013
QuoteGive examples of some other progressions that would work better?.... don't think they exist.

Wow Ignatus, now your getting it, they don't, anything mechanical will eventually fail as they are pure repeating figures over and over, random never follows itself so how can we think a progression or bet selection set in stone used continually will work?
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 20, 06:54 AM 2013
Quote from: superman on May 20, 02:56 AM 2013

Wow Ignatus, now your getting it, they don't, anything mechanical will eventually fail as they are pure repeating figures over and over, random never follows itself so how can we think a progression or bet selection set in stone used continually will work?


I think you're talkin in riddles here superman, only thing im sayin; What would work better than a Negative Progression ?
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Smoczoor on May 20, 07:55 AM 2013
QuoteWhat would work better than a Negative Progression ?


!! high rate hit system + mild progression !!
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: iggiv on May 20, 11:07 AM 2013
Ignatus, you need basic ideas from Pros first. Not a philosophy. One of the basic ideas is to avoid thinking that
cold means it will become hot soon. It may work for a while till it fails miserably.


Quote from: ignatus on May 20, 12:37 AM 2013

I agree, I do not consider myself a "roulette expert". Roulette is one of my hobbies. And inventing strategies, playing roulette. But this is a learning process. I learn everyday. Still I haven't read much about "advanced" strategies, and advanced roulette philosophy, like iggiv would suggest... Perhaps I will do one day, until then, you have to put up with my "lame" strategies. LoL... ;D
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ddarko on May 20, 12:20 PM 2013
One thing I've learnt (God knows if it's true or not) is NOTHING is ever "due"

O0
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: marvin on May 20, 12:43 PM 2013
agree with turner and iggiv, his post lacks radical ideas and originality.


ignatus, big favor please... kindly put all your ideas in notepad or testing zone.
thanks!
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 20, 03:23 PM 2013
Quote from: marvin on May 20, 12:43 PM 2013
agree with turner and iggiv, his post lacks radical ideas and originality.


ignatus, big favor please... kindly put all your ideas in notepad or testing zone.
thanks!


Lack originality and radical ideas ey??? I *try* to keep my bad temper here, but wtf are you talking about?? ALL my strategies are in one way or another getting an advantage, the betselection and progression, all this combined, you say I lack "originality and radical ideas" ?? please man, stfu with your complaining. I say this again: -come up with something better yourself before complaining and thinking you're such a wiseass. Thank you.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 20, 03:42 PM 2013
link:://blog.commlabindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/those-who-try-and-fail-300x300.jpg (link:://blog.commlabindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/those-who-try-and-fail-300x300.jpg)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: iggiv on May 20, 03:51 PM 2013
link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif (link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 20, 03:53 PM 2013
Quote from: iggiv on May 20, 03:51 PM 2013
link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif (link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif)


haha.. xD
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Ralph on May 20, 03:58 PM 2013
Quote from: iggiv on May 20, 03:51 PM 2013
link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif (link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif)


Rake, house advantages, commissions takes more than we usually think. Turnover your bankroll many times it is eaten.


Backing banker in baccarat using negative progression, can end with a "net" which is less than the bank fee.


1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128  You won one unit and pay 6 in commissions.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: marvin on May 21, 05:13 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on May 20, 03:23 PM 2013

Lack originality and radical ideas ey??? I *try* to keep my bad temper here, but wtf are you talking about?? ALL my strategies are in one way or another getting an advantage, the betselection and progression, all this combined, you say I lack "originality and radical ideas" ?? please man, stfu with your complaining. I say this again: -come up with something better yourself before complaining and thinking you're such a wiseass. Thank you.

YES! and i will say it again, IGNATUS' strategies lacks radical ideas and oribinality for it to merit a new section. you didnt listen and read old threads. oh and i already did come up something you. and it jus shows that you arent reading again :)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 21, 10:14 AM 2013
Hey Marv

Ever since this has been going on, I've been wondering about that pesky apostrophe!

I see you put it at the end of the "s", as in "Ignatus'".  I was thinking it would be "Ignatus's".  Thanks for clearing it up.

Sam

Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Ralph on May 21, 10:36 AM 2013
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 21, 10:14 AM 2013
Hey Marv

Ever since this has been going on, I've been wondering about that pesky apostrophe!

I see you put it at the end of the "s", as in "Ignatus'".  I was thinking it would be "Ignatus's".  Thanks for clearing it up.

Sam


The name is from Latin, in English I think it is OK to spell Ignatus' in his native language it is Ignatus as well, but it should be proper Ignati.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on May 21, 10:43 AM 2013
Perhaps not his own section, but a 'Blog' thread maybe?
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Ralph on May 21, 11:47 AM 2013
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on May 21, 10:43 AM 2013
Perhaps not his own section, but a 'Blog' thread maybe?


Yes! A very smart proposal!
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 21, 12:35 PM 2013
Yes, a blog.  He could blogivate!!


Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Chrisbis on May 21, 12:36 PM 2013
If U were describing an item that belongs to Ignatus, then that item would be said to be "Ignatus's" item.


Its HIS item..not a plural of the item, (or a number of people called Ignatus)

Like all those Ideas he has had recently...........they are all Ignatus's ideas..................and long may he sail in them.......... :o
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Turner on May 21, 12:45 PM 2013
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 21, 12:35 PM 2013
Yes, a blog.  He could blogivate!!


You are on form at the moment Samster.....Im still laughing at writing reminders on your fat belly and the wife making you take a shower.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: marvin on May 21, 01:02 PM 2013
yo sam!,


am not really good in english grammar, but the general idea that i understand is that when a noun ends with s  you only need to end it with apostrophe(') instead of apostrophe s ('s)
there maybe some other rules after that might make it s's 


pardon for that missed spelled words and extra words as i was using phone at that time.


have you taken a shower?  :twisted:  ... blame turner for that  :lol:
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: TwoCatSam on May 21, 01:48 PM 2013
Yep, I'm big on showers!!  That's one thing I hate about going to the casino.  Some folks avoid soap like it was a rattlesnake!

They did a survey on what people hated on planes.  Yep, B.O.  People would rather be next to a crying baby.

Babies have to cry; people don't have to stink!

Samster
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Turner on May 21, 02:09 PM 2013
Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 21, 01:48 PM 2013
Yep, I'm big on showers!!  That's one thing I hate about going to the casino.  Some folks avoid soap like it was a rattlesnake!

They did a survey on what people hated on planes.  Yep, B.O.  People would rather be next to a crying baby.

Babies have to cry; people don't have to stink!

Samster


Ive found, at the casino, the more they stink, the worse they play and the more they lose.


may be on to something here
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Kingspin on May 22, 07:46 PM 2013
Two cat stinks i was stood next to him once , and he looses thousands - honest :xd:
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Ralph on May 22, 11:07 PM 2013
They stink due to extensive sweating due to extensive progression, standing with open mouth waiting the ball landing, while the martingale is at table limit. The mental pressure make the former clean underware void.  ;D
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: probasah on May 23, 01:42 AM 2013
(link:://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/24/16/anigif_enhanced-buzz-4720-1366836930-27.gif)

:)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 23, 01:58 AM 2013
I should not even answer this it's so beyond all concept of what is right. You've started a thread against me, and you THINK it's OK to bully me with all your comments, and then point out ME as the bad guy when I reply to all this c r a p. I'm sorry. But this is NOT ok.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: marvin on May 23, 02:29 AM 2013
you brought all of this to yourself :)
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: buffalowizard on May 23, 02:54 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on May 23, 01:58 AM 2013
I should not even answer this it's so beyond all concept of what is right. You've started a thread against me, and you THINK it's OK to bully me with all your comments, and then point out ME as the bad guy when I reply to all this c r a p. I'm sorry. But this is NOT ok.

The merest hint of criticism of any of your methods and you start swearing and ranting - and you wonder what the problem is? Marvin's absolutely right.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Turner on May 23, 05:36 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on May 23, 01:58 AM 2013
I should not even answer this it's so beyond all concept of what is right. You've started a thread against me, and you THINK it's OK to bully me with all your comments, and then point out ME as the bad guy when I reply to all this c r a p. I'm sorry. But this is NOT ok.
Ignatus....the last 10 posts were off topic rambling. It wasnt about you.
Ive found over the years that if i am getting a lot of criticism off people and no one else is....even if i think i am 100% right....its me that is at fault and me that could of avoided it in the first place.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Chrisbis on May 23, 06:39 AM 2013
Topic should be locked now please.


I thought, as the Topic originator, I could lock it, but I cannot.
Can one of the Admin, please lock it for me.
Cheers.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 23, 06:45 AM 2013
It's just sad. The bad attitudes here. And then some moron say : "you deserve it" followed by three post claiming I do deserve it. NO, i don't deserve this bullshit.


iggiv moved some of my *working* strategies to the notepad in all this frenzy. Like "Waiting for the kill", "Hot doublestreets", "Missing sector".


I don't think your criticism is right, I make efforts to produce strategies, and all you do is complain. When you haven't even tried playing them - you claim they don't work. This is bad ... and so on. All bullshit.


Think again. You need to change your attitude. WHO will ever dare to post a strategy after all this "criticism" of me and my strategies?? I think no-one.


Furthermore, I think you also need to change your attitude when it comes to criticising my strategies. I said it before, and I say it again, IF you don't like it - WELL? point out its weak points and give ideas how it can be improved.


ALSO *you* need to start posting your own stuff instead of wasting your energy on criticising MY strategies.


Thank you.


Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ginger on May 23, 07:04 AM 2013
Quote from: marvin on May 23, 02:29 AM 2013
you brought all of this to yourself :)

   Dear Marvin & Buffalo....,

I'm not agree the way how you tried this Chap ( Ignatus ) and like to say the same as Chrisbis....Please...stop this topic...

Cheers

John         The Netherlands
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: ignatus on May 23, 07:24 AM 2013
Quote from: ginger on May 23, 07:04 AM 2013

   Dear Marvin & Buffalo....,

I'm not agree the way how you tried this Chap ( Ignatus ) and like to say the same as Chrisbis....Please...stop this topic...

Cheers

John         The Netherlands


Thanks...yes this topic should be thown in the trash and forgotten.
Title: Re: Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?
Post by: Steve on May 23, 08:45 AM 2013
always refer to the rules. criticism must be justified. open discussion without fear of criticism is critical. if you don't like someone's posts, you can ignore them

if anyone feels someone is bad for the forum, or if they break the rules, then tell me. the rules are clear and fair for everyone