The three numbers in a street turn up in some order (repeats are ignored): A is the earliest number, B is the next coming number, and C is the last one to come.
There are only six possibilities: ABC/ACB/BAC/BCA/CAB/CBA. But there are twelve streets. When one combination comes again, I win (flat betting) and stop. I also end the session, however, instead of betting more than three numbers.
In order to see how it works you only need a pen and a piece of paper with 12 X 3 squares or spaces filled with 1-36. When a number comes , we´ll write one of the three letters in its square as indicated:
36 (A), 26 (A), 28 (A), 20 (A), 25 (B), 8 (A), 22 (A), 14 (A), 18 (A), 36 (repeats are ignored), 33 (A), 10 (A), 29 (B), 32 (B), 30 (C), 3 (A), 28, 34 (B), 9 (B), 14, 8, 15 (B), 1 (B), 21 (B), 31 (C), 4 (A), 34, 32 13 (C). The full street of 13-15 would look like street 7-9, if only 7 (C) would come. So we start betting 7. Similarly we start betting 19!
12 (B), 8, 0, 8, 20, 12, 17 (B). If only 16 (C) would come, street 16-18 would look almost like the full street of 31-33. So we add 16 to our betting.
24 (B), 24, 13, 19 (C). HIT! The full streets of 13-15 and 19-21 are filled with letters in the same order. This session ends here.
Good luck!
This is old but......not bad, not bad at all. Maybe a bit of tweaking is needed but it has big potential.
Ken
I have to run out the door but just sayin......the odds of lets say the next 3 streets completing in the SAME order?
Like.... B A C then B A C then B A C, exactly? Maybe, gotta go.
Ken
I completely understand the how......I dont understand the why.
why would 5 come out after 4 then 6 just because 2 came out after 1 then 3 previously.
Going off the FIRST street completed would set the pace....then, street number 2, then street number 3. All 3 in the same order....like B A C? (as an example).
Ken
Dane is one of the better "thinkers" on these forums----my opinion only!
I had forgotten this little ditty and am happy someone resurrected it.
And if Ken gives it a nod, that's all the more reason to have a closer peek.
Samster
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Mar 08, 11:38 PM 2014
Dane is one of the better "thinkers" on these forums----my opinion only!
I had forgotten this little ditty and am happy someone resurrected it.
And if Ken gives it a nod, that's all the more reason to have a closer peek.
Samster
Thanks! But probash (Alex) just tested it in TheTwoCatCafe, betforum.cc, and concluded:
"Evidently, flat bet, this strategy is a loser in the long run". :(