Recently I remember reading a simple system
Something along the lines of place chips on the 2 most recent dozens
if the spins are
32
24
3
5
17
9
Then youd bet on dozen 2 and 3
If the next spin is 5 you lose but then youd bet dozen 1 and dozen 3 since the spin before last was 32
Betting on the 2 most recent dozens has a decent hit rate. No progression necessary. Whatever the 2 most recent dozens are to show bet that, no virtual loss wait, bet every spin
this is working for me
i wish i knew how to test this on software. cant get a good enough idea mechanically but so far so good
testmystrategy and roulette xtreme cant take this strategy
night 2
celtic casino, european wheel
up another $1,000
betting on 2 most recent dozens, on a loss negative progression, reset on a win
never loses
lucky streak? or do we have something here?
lets see what happens night 3
(this avoids losing when 1 dozen streaks)
You dont have something here. Think about the simplicity vs. 100 years of roulette.
There wouldnt be roulette.
Firstly, double dozen payout is poor and a loss is harsh. There isnt enough payout to make a progression other than triple your bet.
Someone made a good point on one of Ignatus's graphs. The line was all uphill apart from a giant dip. The comment was ....that dip spike could be when you first start and not after some time.
DDs dip big due to the 1:2 odds.
The ratio of 1:2 is its downfall...before you even consider zero and HE
Hi ,
I think the problem is many are testing systems the wrong way. I think best is to test a system
Like you actually going to a casino, your not sitting on a table playing 10.000 spins. Testing 10.000 spins may be good if you have a bot betting for you. If you go to a casino one night , how many spins do you see? Maybe 100? 200? 300? So the point is test the system 100x 100/200/300 spins instead of 10.000 spins and then see on the end if your are ahead.
Grtzz Rewster
Quote from: Rewster88 on Oct 23, 11:03 AM 2014
Hi ,
I think the problem is many are testing systems the wrong way. I think best is to test a system
Like you actually going to a casino, your not sitting on a table playing 10.000 spins. Testing 10.000 spins may be good if you have a bot betting for you. If you go to a casino one night , how many spins do you see? Maybe 100? 200? 300? So the point is test the system 100x 100/200/300 spins instead of 10.000 spins and then see on the end if your are ahead.
Grtzz Rewster
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
O0
If we test all old systems on this forum this way, maybe a good chance that there already is a so called HG? Or a very good consistent one?
Grtzz R
turner
the way i play is not that way
i dont need to triple up, that is too crazy
i dont bet on the sleeping dozen
sometimes the answers to win are simple. as u said this is too simple and thats the key
bet the last 2 recent dozens every spin, when you lose double up. by doubling up you break even on a win.
in my testing you win more than lose, obviously because you are on 66% of board
i can marty 5 times and believe me in those 5 spins a dozen WILL repeat
and rewster, BINGO. i test this live. as it can not be tested as far as i know any other way
just like the 3 double streets even testing thousands of spins even a million spins the 3 center double streaks never miss more than 10 in a row, statistics show waiting for 5 virtual misses then betting is just about flawless. that ONE IN A MILLION where the 3 center double streets loses more than ten in a row is such a rarity. it is a safe EC negative progression bet
follow me! simplicity is the answer
You will lose.
D1-D2-D3-D1-D2-D3
Believe me, you will see that entirely more often than you care to. 5 spins is nothing - random won't even think twice. There is no statistical reason why it can't hit that gives you an advantage and I don't see a "reason" why this could work, even short-term. Double dozens players killed this idea a long time ago after taking a beating. Sorry, but save your money on this one!
there will come a time that this will turn into a grenade
they all seem to work for awhile...look at some of the posts and graphs
and then it happens...
this will not turn out well
We must have all been typing at the same time...3 pretty similar responses in like 3 minutes
that might say something
Quote from: Colbster on Oct 23, 07:42 PM 2014
D1-D2-D3-D1-D2-D3
Believe me, you will see that entirely more often than you care to. 5 spins is nothing - random won't even think twice. There is no statistical reason why it can't hit that gives you an advantage and I don't see a "reason" why this could work, even short-term. Double dozens players killed this idea a long time ago after taking a beating. Sorry, but save your money on this one!
.
link:://:.loothog.com/Systems/DX.php (link:://:.loothog.com/Systems/DX.php)
This is a quick method of testing your exact method. You can choose bankroll, your progression (1,2,4,8,16) if you are using Marty, etc. Run it fast and see how it does.
thanks for that colbster
300 spins, never went negative one time
500 spins
+$80
never went past 6 stage marty
1,000 spins
triple up on a loss
+ $500
I did about 20 sets of 500. Some won 50, some lost 50, then I had a -613. You only need one.
$5 units
progression 5, 10, 30, 90, 250
positive balance everytime
i still like the 3 center double streets better
never sleep more than 10
code that
I don't code. Someone else did that.
rich...
how did you get onto another (better) method within the same thread of your own grail?
are you related to anyone else on this forum? :twisted:
sorry ...I just can't help myself at this point...I will self mod myself to the background here for awhile :-X :-X :-X
test the 3 center double streets after sleeping 5 times in a row
tell me what you find
Here is your middle bet as a chart - it ended poorly
This might be more accurate
colbster
note: it says maximum consecutive losses 9
wait 5 then bet
Dude,
Test it yourself on that testmystrategy.com. I don't know how to use the advanced features and I am telling you now, unequivocally, this is a stinker of a bet. I have already spent more time on this than I should have.
Ive ran thousands of tests on testmystrategy on it. 10 is the typical max.
If you dont like the bet so be it. im here to discuss roulette