From testing my main system it seems I've just discovered a major exploit in roulette.
Here we are only ever betting on 1 double street at a time: wait for a double street to appear then bet on it hoping for a repeat. If you lose then bet on the new double street that appeared instead, but using the progression below. Once you win then start over with the progression, but wait for a new double street to appear before betting on it (or it may work staying on the winning DS - just for the first spin).
Every time a DS repeats you win 1-5 units
Progression: 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 17 21 25 30 36 43 52 62 74
Although a DS can sleep for 79 spins I don't think it will happen whilst chasing the lead.
Alternatively, you can flat-bet this for 5 units profit every win or -1 unit every loss, but you must keep switching to a different DS depending on the last one that came in.
Sounds good. But using these 185 spins betting the last doublestreet loses :(
link:s://:.google.com/search?q=roulette+past+spins&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=j3-TVMPoHoungwTVlIGwDw&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAw&biw=360&bih=592#facrc=_&imgrc=lUqVF_eGuARO3M%253A%3BScKhVJgr44mSNM%3Blink:%253A%252F%252F:.rouletteforum.cc%252Findex.php%253Faction%253Ddlattach%253Btopic%253D3689.0%253Battach%253D4035%3Blink:%253A%252F%252F:.rouletteforum.cc%252Findex.php%253Ftopic%253D3689.0%3B330%3B302 (link:s://:.google.com/search?q=roulette+past+spins&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=j3-TVMPoHoungwTVlIGwDw&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAw&biw=360&bih=592#facrc=_&imgrc=lUqVF_eGuARO3M%253A%3BScKhVJgr44mSNM%3Blink:%253A%252F%252F:.rouletteforum.cc%252Findex.php%253Faction%253Ddlattach%253Btopic%253D3689.0%253Battach%253D4035%3Blink:%253A%252F%252F:.rouletteforum.cc%252Findex.php%253Ftopic%253D3689.0%3B330%3B302)
I'm not seeing a loss in either direction of those last 185 spins:
10,36,9,17,3,26,20,21 (win!)
18,36,15,31,34,12,8 (win!)
3rd row up from bottom start at 18. Unless i missed something
If u start at 18 doesnt it lose? Thats more then 20 misses in a row. It does very well until u get to that 18.
This is a good idea though
18, 24, 25, 31, 17, 3, 1 (win!)
18, 35, 6, 16, 27, 22, 14, 31, 16, 32, 21, 12, 5, 26, 8, 20, 7, 29, 36, 22, 33, 5, 32, 3, 14, 36, 24, 7, 16, 14 (win)
Right you are! Those numbers would have needed a longer progression of 30 steps:
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 17 21 25 30 36 43 52 62 74 89 107 128
Perhaps it's too dangerous using a progression? I did discover it using flat-betting.
I think with minor tweaks this can be a winner all the time. Maybe bet previous 2 double streets. I dont know
Perhaps 30 losses in a row is an extreme event and plenty of profit would be made before that ever came
It's a possibility - or it may be a warning. I guess testing it over several thousand spins might be the only way to find out.
I had a similar idea with the colums
Use progression 1 1 2 3 4 6 9 13 20
Bet on last column to show
you only betting on 1 DS?
your progression result in a lost starting from the 10th bet
Units to bet Net Gain total Stake
1 4 1
1 3 2
1 2 3
1 1 4
1 0 5
2 3 7
2 1 9
2 -1 11
3 1 14
3 -2 17
4 -1 21
5 -1 26
6 -2 32
7 -4 39
8 -7 47
10 -7 57
12 -9 69
14 -13 83
17 -15 100
21 -16 121
25 -21 146
30 -26 176
36 -32 212
43 -40 255
52 -47 307
62 -59 369
74 -73 443
I just tested 200 000 single zero RNG spins. Longest session ended on Spin 68.
Here is the table:
2 4212
3 3352
4 2828
5 2448
6 2108
7 1760
8 1543
9 1262
10 1064
11 862
12 760
13 646
14 535
15 448
16 403
17 364
18 284
19 229
20 188
21 176
22 142
23 112
24 102
25 103
26 80
27 70
28 62
29 55
30 31
31 46
32 29
33 33
34 21
35 17
36 14
37 13
38 16
39 8
40 10
41 8
42 6
43 2
44 3
45 3
46 3
47 2
48 1
49 2
50 1
51 1
52 2
53 1
54 0
55 1
56 0
57 0
58 0
59 1
60 0
61 0
62 1
63 0
64 0
65 0
66 0
67 1
68 1
26476
Quote from: bbb128 on Dec 18, 09:43 PM 2014
you only betting on 1 DS?
your progression result in a lost starting from the 10th bet
Units to bet Net Gain total Stake
1 4 1
1 3 2
1 2 3
1 1 4
1 0 5
2 3 7
2 1 9
2 -1 11
3 1 14
3 -2 17
4 -1 21
5 -1 26
6 -2 32
7 -4 39
8 -7 47
10 -7 57
12 -9 69
14 -13 83
17 -15 100
21 -16 121
25 -21 146
30 -26 176
36 -32 212
43 -40 255
52 -47 307
62 -59 369
74 -73 443
Actually his progression returns a profit at every stage:
Units to bet Net Gain Total Stake
1 5 1
1 4 2
1 3 3
1 2 4
1 1 5
2 5 7
2 3 9
2 1 11
3 4 14
3 1 17
4 3 21
5 4 26
6 4 32
7 3 39
8 1 47
10 3 57
12 3 69
14 1 83
17 2 100
21 5 121
25 4 146
30 4 176
36 4 212
43 3 255
52 5 307
62 3 369
74 1 443
ic
there was a error on my progression calculator :xd:
thanks
Hi,
Oddly enough I was trying this yesterday!
I even waited first for 12 non-repeat lines before using a 30-step progression on FTL line.
Most times it will work - but just saying beware - I encountered a bust in only a few hundred real spins.
Am sure this has been rejected before. I think a "fail" rather than "grail"...
A.
Quote from: falkor on Dec 18, 07:58 PM 2014
From testing my main system it seems I've just discovered a major exploit in roulette.
Here we are only ever betting on 1 double street at a time: wait for a double street to appear then bet on it hoping for a repeat. If you lose then bet on the new double street that appeared instead, but using the progression below. Once you win then start over with the progression, but wait for a new double street to appear before betting on it (or it may work staying on the winning DS - just for the first spin).
Every time a DS repeats you win 1-5 units
Progression: 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 17 21 25 30 36 43 52 62 74
Although a DS can sleep for 79 spins I don't think it will happen whilst chasing the lead.
Alternatively, you can flat-bet this for 5 units profit every win or -1 unit every loss, but you must keep switching to a different DS depending on the last one that came in.
Pls explain: If it is so easy why messing around with that warrior-thing?
These repetitive systems are easy to play, but I never found any that worked. However, this one was showing more profit in flat-betting when I tested it. I didn't know how it would perform using a progression, but thanks to Irish we now know that the 42 progression steps max isn't enough to cover all losing streaks. The warriors system is based on Law of the Third so has more predictability power in certain situations!
So the guy with 45+ pages of data about his "main" system, can't run numbers on a basic martingale
I posted this yesterday after Iggiv gave Falkor an ultimatum, but before he posted "holy grail" :
"Why should anyone believe Falkor given his behavior through this thread?
How is this behavior not "Trolling"?
If he provided an excellent system on January 1st - why should anyone believe him?
This is a much larger question for the forum as a whole - what behavior warrants a breach of trust?"
How is anyone still falling for this con......................the promise of easy money.............you can't cheat an honest man.
Falkor rides again!!!
Quote from: falkor on Dec 19, 07:38 AM 2014
The warriors system is based on Law of the Third so has more predictability power in certain situations!
Never ever was any predictable power discoverd by using the Law of the Third.
And there is no certain situation htat gives an advantage.
Certain outcomes may appear and may not. But they will always do so by their statiscal chance.
He started a thread with an actual strategy. Let it be.
With Warriors, let's say that DS 1 closed on spin # 2-6 and DS 2 closed on spin #17-21 with 1 repeat or less this would predict and guarantee that DS 3 will close within 2 spins - usually the following spin.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Dec 19, 07:58 AM 2014
He started a thread with an actual strategy. Let it be.
Should we congratulate him on waking up this morning as well?
When did just "posting an actual strategy" become acceptable?
When did beating roulette turn into a Book Club?
No wonder we don't have a working strategy to beat the game.....
thelaw, Do you think your behaviour could be considered trolling?
How do you think you could improve your behaviour on this forum, or are you above the law?
Quote from: falkor on Dec 19, 08:07 AM 2014
With Warriors, let's say that DS 1 closed on spin # 2-6 and DS 2 closed on spin #17-21 with 1 repeat or less this would predict and guarantee that DS 3 will close within 2 spins - usually the following spin.
what happened in the spins between #6 and #17? No 4th, 5th, 6th DS appeared and closed? and ds3 sleeping for at least 17 spins
has to hit at spin 19? What a holy shrek
I'm only referring to the DSs that are in play as per the rules of warriors, and if there is a long losing streak between DS 1 and 2 closing it means that the action has been happening elsewhere on the carpet: 5-6 DSs are opening up, several repeats are coming in - mostly on the DS that already closed perhaps. It's a bit like GUT: if RN crossings are not happening then perhaps it's the NF crossing that are happening instead.