For being a flatbetting strategy, this one seems to work (?). (and it's very easy to play!)
Column 1 & 3 is only bet.
--Bet each split that hits in column 1 or 3, (in a progressive bet).
(This is to keep the amount of splits bet to a decent level).
As one split hit, start over with that single split bet.
Progression -none- flatbet.
First test was played with 25u bet (+2500u Win, -2500 Loss)
4/5 Games won
You are betting one split at a time, or....?
Quote from: nextyear on Aug 24, 01:52 AM 2015
You are betting one split at a time, or....?
Yes, that's right! one split for each hit in column 1 or 3 (this could be played in any two dozens or any two columns) but two columns/dozens are only bet.... This seems to work, because it keep the amont splits bet to a decent level. and you don't stop until you get a hit, (this is also because it reduces losses) then restart at 1 split, with that last split hit.
more spins... 5/6 Games won
6/7 Games won
Another loss... 6/8 Games won
Final Stats 7/10 Games won.
What do you expect?? i think 70% winrate is pretty good. And it's flatbet!
i don't know why you ignore it..... >:(
Quote from: ignatus on Aug 24, 01:02 PM 2015
What do you expect?? i think 70% winrate is pretty good. And it's flatbet!
i don't know why you ignore it..... >:(
I see 2400 spins yielding 420 units (using base 1 unit) for a gain of .17 per spin with an average drawdown of 50 units.
This is unacceptable!
Either that or someone needs to inform iggiv the grail has been found!
With a large enough bankroll to survive drawdowns most of your systems would be very good. Especially with a hit and run style.
Oh, it's a holly grail. A very nice one :)
Ahah jokes aside, it seems a nice system to play...
Do you have it botted or you did the 10 sessiosn manually? If you have it botted, do 1000 sessions please... and share the results with us if you don't mind :) 10 sessions is not much to draw big conclusions ...
Quote from: vladir on Aug 24, 07:19 PM 2015
Oh, it's a holly grail. A very nice one :)
Ahah jokes aside, it seems a nice system to play...
Do you have it botted or you did the 10 sessiosn manually? If you have it botted, do 1000 sessions please... and share the results with us if you don't mind :) 10 sessions is not much to draw big conclusions ...
I did it manually, took a few hours. and the amount of work i put in is not in accordance with the responses.
It's not about finding "the holy grail", no system can win all the time. it's about finding a system with pretty good hitrate. and as i said a flatbetting system that has 70% winrate is a pretty good system imo.
why should i do more spins? i did 10 sessions already, still im ignored? im getting tired of that general ignorance here on this forum.
Quote from: ignatus on Aug 25, 02:08 AM 2015
I did it manually, took a few hours. and the amount of work i put in is not in accordance with the responses.
It's not about finding "the holy grail", no system can win all the time. it's about finding a system with pretty good hitrate. and as i said a flatbetting system that has 70% winrate is a pretty good system imo.
why should i do more spins? i did 10 sessions already, still im ignored? im getting tired of that general ignorance here on this forum.
Manual testing you should do no more sessions of course...that's too tedious and time consuming.If a system is promissing, it needs to be automated, at least for testing purposes. You need a bigger set of sessions to draw better conclusions.
I don't think people exactly ignore you so to say, but there are many distractions...
I dont think its ignore,,, probably many or most read your stuff. on some im not sure of the bet selection---you should pull out a few of your favorites once in awhile for review .
Quote from: Tomla021 on Aug 25, 11:06 AM 2015
I dont think its ignore,,, probably many or most read your stuff. on some im not sure of the bet selection---you should pull out a few of your favorites once in awhile for review .
ok..
Quote from: ignatus on Aug 23, 04:21 PM 2015
Column 1 & 3 is only bet.
--Bet each split that hits in column 1 or 3, (in a progressive bet).
(This is to keep the amount of splits bet to a decent level).
I'm not sure I understand this. Could you give an example?
Ignatus,
we appreciate your system research and the fact that you are willing to share your findings.
The only thing is, that your explanations are hard to understand.
If I may suggest instead of posting endless bankroll graphs please post session examples. Spin results you had and explain where and why you bet how much.
Like:
12
34
23
35 bet x units on y because
23
4
6 don't do zz because of yy
and so on.