#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => The Notepad => Topic started by: button on May 04, 01:38 AM 2016

Title: Cycle Betting on Dozens
Post by: button on May 04, 01:38 AM 2016
I was looking through some old notes of systems that I was developing prior to going all outside the box and I came across this one.  Not sure if it has been posted before, but Priyanka's Random Thoughts thread made me think about cycles of betting so here it is.

One of the simplest methods you can come across.

One dummy spin required, then bet on the dozen that hits for 5 flat bets of 1 unit (you only have to win 2 bets to be in profit for the 5 bet cycle).
If not in profit after 5 bets increase bet on next dozen by 1 unit until in profit or 5 bets are exhausted. 
Whenever at a new high and bet is higher than 1 unit always reduce bet back to 1 unit, even if it is after bet 1 of the 5 bet cycle.
If, after each cycle of 5 bets you are not at a new high, increase bet by 1 unit on next dozen.

You can limit your bet size if you want to, but in 50 sessions of 100 spins I have never got higher than 10 units.  A run from hell is likely to come someday.
In testing using both RNG and live spin data I have not lost a session yet, but I have had a few drawdowns of over 100 before recovering.  So a BR of at least 200-300 units is required.

Average win for 100 spins is around 20-40 units.
Title: Re: Cycle Betting on Dozens
Post by: NextYear on May 04, 01:51 AM 2016
Thanks Button, I suppose that this can relax your brain in the meantime of yours attempts to predict numbers!
Title: Re: Cycle Betting on Dozens
Post by: Vitalij_D on May 04, 03:58 PM 2016
You can go far . I reached the rate of 27 chips on the dozen . Here is the schedule of the game. And maybe even worse ...
Title: Re: Cycle Betting on Dozens
Post by: PeaBea65 on May 20, 03:29 PM 2016
Quote from: Vitalij_D on May 04, 03:58 PM 2016
You can go far . I reached the rate of 27 chips on the dozen . Here is the schedule of the game. And maybe even worse ...

I think you pretty much got it Vitalij, big fail.  :o