This is for the RED/BLACK players out there TESTING REQUIRED
if this has been done before on this forum sorry for repeating it
pick a colour RED or BLACK
example here is RED ......
1, bet only on red everytime starting bet 0.10
2, when win .........only then double bet to 0.20
3, keep to same bet amount until ...next win then increase bet again
keep increasing bet amount after a win until profit
profit is anything above bankroll be it 1 unit then STOP,.
start again.
link:s://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4sce6iX8-czTDNuR3l4WTRXczA/view?usp=sharing
this is extreme example ONLY using RNG numbers and bet amount is very high ...best to use a low bet amount e.g 0.01 to start with.
AS soon as you are in profit stop. start again
FURTHER TESTING IS REQUIRED
let me know what you think
icashbot
With low stakes could be ok
It may fight the variance?
Quick test with some Dublin spins... easy to play but scary! 8)
According to your number of spins on image 2 I would have placed 2 bets and won both of them. It`s knowing WHEN and WHAT to bet .
Learn how to win.
Thanks for your post.
ND
Quote from: Normy2000 on Sep 25, 05:33 PM 2016easy to play but scary!
What you could maybe do to make it less scary and not so steep progression is not to keep doubling no matter what.
Keep in mind the doubling strategy on a win but ONLY IF still after winning the double would not lead to new Balance high. If it WILL LEAD to new high then you may just increase as much as needed to reach that new high and not keep doubling no matter what!
For example. At bet #144 we were at 58 units and New High was at 103. So we needed 103-58=45 units. We could continue the progression with 45 Units bet on bet#145 instead of 256 units.
I know... We would have lost all that profit and be only at 103. But it's the price for safer progression. Anyone can play it anyway he likes with any degree of risk/reward he feels comfortable with. I would have gone with the safer and anytime whenever I can, top priority to keep low the progression.
With same results as in the example you can end up betting MAX 40 instead of 256.
Not so risky, not so profitable. Personal tastes. At least I think it could do better at long sessions and bad streaks.
Not that i'm still convinced that it can fight variance as stated but who knows...