#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Common interest => Off-Topic => Topic started by: Steve on Oct 28, 07:23 PM 2016

Title: answer for ken
Post by: Steve on Oct 28, 07:23 PM 2016
Ken said:
-----------
Do the math idiot. Ok, we'll say Scammer Steve gets a couple more sales (cough) due to these threads vs. HOW MANY dumped sales (cough) he lost. More for him? You are nuts RG. Also, answer this.....if that was the case, then why would Scammer Steve offer to buy this site? (lol
----------

The math is this: anyone with a brain and intention to spend between $2500 - $80,000 with me, or enter an arrangement to pay only with winnings, is going to do proper research and find kens motives, the motives of people like mark howe, and see my response with facts. The truth is on my side. People with money are not idiots. Only people on forums who are broke and desperate to harm others have no brains.

That's why there's the saying no publicity is worse than bad publicity.

Im not trying to stop the lies about me. The attacks are publicity, that actually do more good than bad. All i need to do is respond with facts. Or anyone with a brain can just research. And anyone too stupid to figure it out is not the type of person i want to work with.

And if that's not enough, theres this:

Simple Ways To Find The Truth

1. Get a FREE trial roulette computer to test at home

2. See a demonstration of my roulette computer on any wheel you want

3. Get my best roulette computer for FREE, and pay with winnings

4. Test my roulette system for 5-days for just $1

5. Review the public and independent test results

6. See recordings of public demonstrations I conducted

Proof doesn’t get clearer than this. Alternatively, you can waste days researching blatantly manipulative nonsense about everything imaginable, and still you wont know what to believe. But the truth about what really matters is easily obtained.

In the end the reason i respond is not for money. I do rather well either way. Its to tell the truth about me. I'm an honest person who is attacked with attrocious blatant lies.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Steve on Oct 28, 07:49 PM 2016
And bombus, you don't need to buy my computer to test it. Anyone can test it for free.

Im considering doing another ronjo style public test soon. For those who don't know, i sent a free computer to a respected neutral forum member, and put them in touch with one player in his country, and it all confirmed my claims about my computer...are true.

Ken, youre making yourself look like a fool. I know you think otherwise but it's not going to end well for you. And you'll end up helping me.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Steve on Oct 29, 01:22 AM 2016
And ken, It's impossible to suppress even one idiots efforts to post junk. Negative information can be posted anywhere, so I do not even bother to try to suppress it, and buying every site is not a viable approach.

All i do is respond with the truth, and remind people they can even test my computers and system before buying. Remember the truth is on my side.

i offered to buy gf because i wanted a forum that covered all games, not just roulette. That's why i created GAMBLERSFORUM.COM

Later Ill post what i sent mike, the gf owner.  His forum has almost no organic traffic, the members are almost all banned from other forums, most of the posts are stolen from other forums, and virtually the only original posts are junk bickering like yours. What i liked was the site functionality.

There's more but you have no idea about anything ken, and i don't have time to help you understand
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Oct 29, 05:24 AM 2016
I wanted Ken to be better than he was.  He had some good theories on Roulette.  He said
he and a partner were running a fake restaurant.  Ken seemed to have slipped into madness.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: nowun on Oct 29, 06:28 AM 2016
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Oct 29, 05:24 AM 2016
I wanted Ken to be better than he was.  He had some good theories on Roulette.  He said
he and a partner were running a fake restaurant. Ken seemed to have slipped into madness.

I have read his posts with interest for years and agree with the highlighted parts except substitute is and seems for was and seemed.  He has slipped in my estimation and would no longer get my respect in any circumstance.  He also does seem to have gone a bit nuts, but maybe he always was and is just showing it more now.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Steve on Oct 29, 06:55 AM 2016
Yes he's gone nuts. I explained part of why. Now he's looking for someone to vent on. I'm the winner.  Lucky me.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: nowun on Oct 29, 10:42 AM 2016
Quote from: Steve on Oct 29, 06:55 AM 2016
Yes he's gone nuts. I explained part of why. Now he's looking for someone to vent on. I'm the winner.  Lucky me.

The highlighted part made me laugh out loud.  Steve you are brilliant.  Very sorry this is happening to you, but you are just brilliant.

So cool. 8)
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Turner on Oct 29, 11:03 AM 2016
Yeah....Its pretty uncomfortable watching someone having a nervous break down  :o

I think Kens doing badly at roulette and needs an ego win. Trouble is, normal minds can see how twisted his logic is.

He just looks nuts. 

Anyhow, beats any UK soap opera running currently  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: DoctorSudoku on Oct 29, 07:20 PM 2016
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Oct 29, 05:24 AM 2016

He said
he and a partner were running a fake restaurant. 





What exactly is a fake restaurant?

A place where inedible (i.e. non-eatable) things are packaged and sold as food?
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 29, 07:23 PM 2016
Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Oct 29, 07:20 PM 2016



What exactly is a fake restaurant?

A place where inedible (i.e. non-eatable) things are packaged and sold as food?

Lmao

He meant it never was actually real. The J lied
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Steve on Oct 29, 07:38 PM 2016
I finally figured it out.

'J' is for JOKE.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 29, 07:48 PM 2016
Not worth the cyber space

He does not understand basic stuff

He copies and pastes from others. Its like at this point dealing with a toddler.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: nottophammer on Oct 29, 07:50 PM 2016
Fcu k'in hell it's like murder she wrote  :twisted:
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: nowun on Oct 29, 09:41 PM 2016
Quote from: Steve on Oct 29, 07:38 PM 2016
I finally figured it out.

'J' is for JOKE.

:thumbsup:  Geeze Steve, that took you a while.  :twisted:

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Oct 29, 07:48 PM 2016
Its like at this point dealing with a toddler.

Almost an insult to toddlers.  At least toddlers have an excuse.  ;)
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: mogul397 on Oct 30, 03:53 PM 2016
Quote from: Steve on Oct 29, 01:22 AM 2016
And ken, It's impossible to suppress even one idiots efforts to post junk. Negative information can be posted anywhere, so I do not even bother to try to suppress it, and buying every site is not a viable approach.

All i do is respond with the truth, and remind people they can even test my computers and system before buying. Remember the truth is on my side.

i offered to buy gf because i wanted a forum that covered all games, not just roulette. That's why i created GAMBLERSFORUM.COM

Later Ill post what i sent mike, the gf owner.  His forum has almost no organic traffic, the members are almost all banned from other forums, most of the posts are stolen from other forums, and virtually the only original posts are junk bickering like yours. What i liked was the site functionality.

There's more but you have no idea about anything ken, and i don't have time to help you understand

Tried to sign up there. Wouldn't let me. Am I banned there to?

Remember I asked in PM about no answers? That was one of the questions.
That I couldn't sign up.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Alekos on Oct 30, 07:33 PM 2016
Quote from: mogul397 on Oct 30, 03:53 PM 2016
That I couldn't sign up.

They let me in.  :girl_to:
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Steve on Oct 30, 10:02 PM 2016
Mogul, you cant get in with that shirt. But I'll make an exception.

The problem was the verification email link wasnt clicked. Maybe your ISP blocked it. I've done it for you and now you can log in.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Nov 04, 04:22 PM 2016
One more thing I want to clear up re Ken.  He said he would spend all day at the casino mostly profitable.  What about the part about needing a 'pee bag' because he (or other people) were on a hot streak (that sounded real)
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Turner on Nov 04, 05:17 PM 2016
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Nov 04, 04:22 PM 2016needing a 'pee bag'
well he would fit in nicely in UK casinos, stinking of piss.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: RouletteGhost on Nov 04, 06:10 PM 2016
A man with issues. We all have issues. But one should know when "to walk away"

He turned out to be a copy and paste king. Pasting info that was posted days prior by another member. Signs of desperation.
Title: Re: answer for ken
Post by: Steve on Nov 04, 06:35 PM 2016
He was just angry and blaming the wrong person. He's calmed down for now, but it's not to say he won't start up again.