#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Money management => Topic started by: bleep24 on Jan 13, 03:54 PM 2017

Title: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: bleep24 on Jan 13, 03:54 PM 2017
Has anyone used this staking method?    Mainly it is for E/C`s but I was thinking of pitting 3 D/S`s against 3 D/S`s thus making it an E/C.  Could you play each side separately or even use differential betting?    There`s something for you to ponder on.

Brian
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: Priyanka on Jan 13, 04:02 PM 2017
Quote from: bleep24 on Jan 13, 03:54 PM 2017pitting 3 D/S`s against 3 D/S`s
Are you thinking of something like pitting DS2,4,5 against DS1,3,6 for the complete Contre d'alembert progression. Is it something like what Dane mentioned in this post? link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13391.0
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: RouletteGhost on Jan 13, 04:22 PM 2017
I have no tried it. But I've used double streets as EC bets and could never ever make it work

Looking forward to someone making it work

Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: bleep24 on Jan 13, 05:22 PM 2017
Hi RG,

I am going to have a play round with it tomorrow so we shall see what we shall see (Good or bad            or ugly)!!!!!!!

Brian
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: bleep24 on Jan 14, 08:33 AM 2017
Well I have not tried the contre D`Alembert but I have been testing differential betting.   Unfortunately I do not think it can be `botted` so will have to hand test.  Looks good on the 2 sessions (about 50 spins each) that I tested from `live` real time play.  (Not back testing)   I used 3 x D/S`s v 3 x D/s`s.   A/B and both times came out well in front and no big staking!        Main bugbear is recording and getting bets on in small amount of time between spins and it is easy to slip up.  In B & M will be easier to play.  Used +1/-1 - my favourite.  There was plenty of variance between A and B.

Brian
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: RouletteGhost on Jan 14, 09:13 AM 2017
i thought of this

have not tried it yet

take 2 sets of DS

Set 1 - 2, 4, 5
Set 2 - 1, 3, 6

Record spins, when one set falls behind by 5, flat bet it until profit then retrack

Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: 6th-sense on Jan 14, 10:47 AM 2017
i think it can be coded by nicksmi... me and twocat sam had a an xl sheet with a system with this built in on one of the options of betting to choose from...it worked on the stef bot.. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: 6th-sense on Jan 14, 10:50 AM 2017
just checked the link to danes system it could have been that that we was playing sounds familiar
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: 6th-sense on Jan 14, 11:01 AM 2017
heres the sheets 1.1 and 1.2 i think they were for lines it was so long ago hope they work or give you an idea..choose which option you want to use i think its self explanatory use the slider to go across page adjust profit stoploss etc to suit your needs   
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: DoctorSudoku on Jan 15, 05:26 PM 2017
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 14, 09:13 AM 2017
i thought of this

have not tried it yet

take 2 sets of DS

Set 1 - 2, 4, 5
Set 2 - 1, 3, 6

Record spins, when one set falls behind by 5, flat bet it until profit then retrack

Rich,
Nice idea that could work -- thanks. Have to test it out with my own set of real wheel spins.
Title: Re: Contre D`Alambert
Post by: RouletteGhost on Jan 15, 06:23 PM 2017
Long islands first casino opens next month

won't have to go to queens anymore

If this tests well I'll try it there