Some time ago, I played with BV nozero roulette.
The strategy was very simple, used a trend bet selection and John Patrick's regression.
Bet selection
When I started sessions waited for 2 different dozen , and Play That they repeat, Play That 2dozens till lose. In this way we play each spin, because if you fall out sleeper, we have 2 different last dozens.
Regression
We go up when we win
4-2-3-4-5
when we come to 5 units and the win, session is over
stop lose is 3 attempts, if the lose 3 times first bet ,end session.
To my surprise, after a few thousand spins, BR was positive.
I do not think this will continue in the long run, but the results were very interesting.
I do not play this strategy further for lack of time.
Music to ND ears
HAlf hearted endorsement.
Recently I saw a post that claimed to play last two dozens.
After a loss increase 1 unit and keep doing that until you
are positive, or new high. I forget which.
Anyone hear of this one?
Quote from: mogul397 on Jan 18, 09:47 PM 2017
HAlf hearted endorsement.
Recently I saw a post that claimed to play last two dozens.
After a loss increase 1 unit and keep doing that until you
are positive, or new high. I forget which.
Anyone hear of this one?
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18359.msg170423#msg170423
I always thought that 2 dozen is too much, with such a strategy can not act.
I think that I have already tried once to play regressions with constant choice of 2 dozens.
But never were behaving in this way.
The combination of this bet selection, regression, and stoplose after 3 attemps looks very good.
I do not know whether the results at the wheel of the single Zero will be good, but with this strategy you need to play a lot of spin, to make profit.
Quote from: Mortagon on Jan 18, 11:09 PM 2017
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18359.msg170423#msg170423
Yeah!!!!
YEAH!!!!!!!
THAT'S the one. Thanks. Couldn't remember where it was.
And HEY!!!! I even responded to it asking thunderpants a question!!!!!
(With no response).
I meant bellagioowner.
Not for nothin', I tried this double dozen on paper with a couple sets
of data, increase 1 unit on losses and it was fantastic.
That doesn't mean I can envision plenty of sessions when it might not
have been as great, but I'm not sure how the math of that prodression
might have worked.
Original post-
Are you playing that the last two doz will repeat?
Yes. I play that the last two dozens will repeat.
I do not have too much time to continue testing, but recently played a couple of sessions on nozero rng and after a few hundred spins was a plus.
Mild positive progression is very hard, variance is very big.
This is almost flat betting, if there is any edge is minimal.