When there are 3 unique dozens in a row
Example
3
1
2
This is a trigger
When that happens the next 3 bets are 5DS
Bet all DS except the one that hit in dozen 3
If lose bet al DS except one that hit in dozen 1
If lose bet all DS except one that hit in dozen 2
With progression
Just an idea
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 05, 09:59 PM 2017
When there are 3 unique dozens in a row
Example
3
1
2
This is a trigger
When that happens the next 3 bets are 5DS
Bet all DS except the one that hit in dozen 3
If lose bet al DS except one that hit in dozen 1
If lose bet all DS except one that hit in dozen 2
With progression
Just an idea
I promise you.. if you look at non random. And bet two dozens your hit rate is higher then betting random.
Best bets
If a dozen hits let's say 1
Wait until two hit. Then Bet repeat of both. If another hits bet repeat of last two !!!! I'm drunk at a bar so know I'm not lying to you. Hit rate is higher 😅
I enjoyed your thread on dozens a couple years ago btw 👍
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 05, 09:59 PM 2017With progression
so the 3-step neg prog is something like this: 1-6-40 ?? isn't it so dangerous?? (as Mr. Steve says)
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 05, 09:59 PM 2017Just an idea
surprisingly this is working well on my initial tests, this is an unique idea . good work.
Quoteyour hit rate is higher then betting random.
no is not...hit rate is 24/37 thati s all there is....having non random as you said is just simply doing Monte carlo experiment,you are maping non random space under random rain
Quote from: maestro on May 06, 07:31 AM 2017
no is not...hit rate is 24/37 thati s all there is....having non random as you said is just simply doing Monte carlo experiment,you are maping non random space under random rain
Thats not what i meant by hit rate.. but your the maestro. I appreciate the lesson! :twisted: :thumbsup:
Quote from: MoneyT101 on May 05, 10:43 PM 2017
I promise you.. if you look at non random. And bet two dozens your hit rate is higher then betting random.
Best bets
If a dozen hits let's say 1
Wait until two hit. Then Bet repeat of both. If another hits bet repeat of last two !!!! I'm drunk at a bar so know I'm not lying to you. Hit rate is higher 😅
I enjoyed your thread on dozens a couple years ago btw 👍
Used to play this way all the time
Law of the third stuff
When there are two unique dozens back to back bet those two dozens
Works well until it doesnt
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 06, 11:18 AM 2017
Used to play this way all the time
Law of the third stuff
When there are two unique dozens back to back bet those two dozens
Works well until it doesnt
You can learn what i explained and play the same idea you have about playing 2 dozens and win more times then you lose..
I know you are anti giving away info
but i am not like that
so lets discuss it
see image
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 06, 12:16 PM 2017
I know you are anti giving away info
but i am not like that
so lets discuss it
Its that it took me almost two years to understand... also im still learning. I gave away alot of information and put things more clear and helping people get there. Im just not going to give it away because it took me so many hours to learn.
Now based on your sheet
Wins 28
Loss 14
I forgot to add thats without progression or any adjustment!
Basically breaking even on dozens 😱
I've played this before. Very successfully
But then we can get several instances in a row of three unique dozen outcomes
Which kills the strategy
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 06, 02:58 PM 2017
I've played this before. Very successfully
But then we can get several instances in a row of three unique dozen outcomes
Which kills the strategy
Rich,
I could be mistaken about this, but I vaguely remember Denzie proposing the following somewhere in the middle of the enormously long grassroots thread:
if two different dozens appear consecutively, then for the next spin only, bet that the remaining dozen will appear to complete the set of three uniques.
Indeed he did
And I played it for while
But it needs to be tweaked
Having one of two unique dozens repeat happens more than getting 3 unique dozens in a row
The problem is if they cluster you lose bigly
Using your image I broke even. It looks like I always will break even try to play two. 🤔
I think going up on a win for one turn and then back down until a loss and then go up again for one turn on a win is best... I'm a post the numbers you used here and see if it will work
This is the beginning...
113
221
112
131
131
331-- by this point LWWLWWLWWW
233
201
231
321
101
So if on a win I go up and then back to starting unit until a loss would be maybe better. 🤔🤔