Do the numbers have weight.
By this, i mean a string of numbers 0 to 36, could we say thre weight is 666
I remember studying this (doesn't mean anything)
s1-3, s16-18, s34-36 represent a 'scale' of sorts
If s1-3 hit you would bet s34-36, s16-18 for 'balance'
& if s34-36 hit vice versa.
Thanks for reply proof, seems your the only one with some balls to comeback, too this daft subject.
here are the 37 #'s on the wheel, yes we all know they add to 666, but is there any weight to the numbers over 37 spins
(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/05/13/temp_559621.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/X9YV) |
Here are 37 #'s from real live spins
(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/05/13/temp_705046.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/XErt) |
As you can see the weight/value is not 666, but 636
So math people could we use w/v to find some magical number/value to bet
Thinking outside the box, but is it just a crazy thought.
(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/05/13/temp_692133.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/XSKf) |
So 30 spins has a w/v of 515 where do we go from here
Lets say some idiot or one of the coders out there coded 37 spins like Luck of the irish did 500,000 cycles, would we get a weight/value
QuoteLets say some idiot
not a nice word..i would rather change it...but yeah ...if roulette outcomes DO NOT REPEAT....there will be always 4 consecutive sectors with their sum greater or equal to 74...
Maestro that idiot would be me, but like the cat in the i'ams advert, i can't code.
What would be changing the w/v as the spins come? perhaps if 1st doz is trending more over the 37 spins, would lower the w/v, could that be an indicator to bet the lower numbers
Quote from: maestro on May 13, 12:27 PM 2017
not a nice word..i would rather change it...but yeah ...if roulette outcomes DO NOT REPEAT....there will be always 4 consecutive sectors with their sum greater or equal to 74...
Would 37 spins repeat.
What do you mean by 4 consecutive sectors, do you mean 9 spins being 1 sector, remember i'm not MIT maths, i'm stage 2,8 year old :yawn:
now i'm getting out me depth.
What if you had a computer log as many combo's 37 spins would produce and as you played, would the bot be able to come up with the bet for spin 37
QuoteWhat do you mean by 4 consecutive sectors
34,9,8,15 so sum of 4,then 9,8,15,and new number say 33..and so on but will not help..
The value of the 1st 12 spins =236. R= right of tier, L= left of tier, t= tier. Now I'll let your add up the value of the tier on the wheel
(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/05/14/temp_927722.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/XV29) |
There is no weight to numbers. Roulette is purely cause and effect.
(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/05/14/temp_906914.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/XXYZ)= 236
Steve you never know, the/you experts might just over looked something :lol:
I'm open to being wrong of course. But I've already done a lot of testing on the principles discussed. And my conclusion is what ive found. Until i see something that opposes what i found, I'll naturally have the same conclusion.
What i believe is not my opinion. Its what i found from my own testing. Testing that involves billions of rng spins, automated software, and lots of real spins too.
What better way to find real patterns than with automated software to find anomalies? That's what i developed. Manual testing is far too time consuming.
Hi nottophammer, that sum total is the divisor of a weighted series.
What's normally done in linear weighted ma, the latest numbers are multiplied by the highest weight while the earliest number is multiplied by the lowest weight - giving it the weighted effect. The cumulative total is divided by this divisor to obtain the lwma.
For roulette, the raw data(number) is converted into a binary read to plot the series eg. red=+1 and black=-1.
Quote from: Steve on May 14, 04:21 PM 2017
What better way to find real patterns than with automated software to find anomalies? That's what i developed. Manual testing is far too time consuming.
No matter whether we find it or not, it's not limited to only one way. As to better, it involves precision, consistency, practicality and eventually the edge that draws in the net positive, the latter to me is the most important since if we're doing it we're living it.
Thought it funny that the tier came to 236 in total and the 1st 12 spins was 236, with 5 from the tier section itself, just coincidence, but thanks cht