Well now, what can i say? This is a tweak of WOF1; and as you know, (or may not know?) IS that betting the current number hit and it's 2 neighbours is a LOSING BET. (i've tried so many times, in so many ways and failed betting the current number hit and it's 2 neigbours)... STILL i know that numbers hit in clusters on the wheel. SO? What do I draw conclutions out of this riddle?
Wheel Of Fortune FINAL, I bet 2 sectors of 5 on each side OUTSIDE the the current number hit and it's 5 number sector. (see pic) THEREFORE increasing chances of getting hit. That's my theory atleast, then we'll see if this theory is true or not...
Procedure: The bet is 10 numbers--BET the 2 Keynumbers (5+5 Sectors), Do 3 spins then STOP and pick a new trigger (a new number/current number hit) Also stop/restart if hit
Progression -none- FLATBET
Wheel of Fortune FINAL--KEYNUMBERS (European Wheel)
0=21,28
1=10,22
2=27,32
3=19,29
4=26,34
5=11,20
6=21,30
7=26,31
8=16,27
9=28,33
10=1,36
11=5,34
12=22,32
13=23,25
14=24,29
15=25,35
16=8,31
17=19,36
18=20,35
19=3,17
20=5,18
21=0,6
22=1,12
23=13,33
24=14,30
25=13,15
26=4,7
27=2,8
28=0,9
29=3,14
30=6,24
31=7,16
32=2,12
33=9,23
34=4,11
35=15,18
36=10,17
Well, this was obviously a bad idea, had no luck flatbet OR with progression, so,... let this fall into oblivion.... moving on...
Ignatus, i will try to explain a system idea,
not easy to track and not easy to place bets, even i see it impossible to place bets but who knows with some bot......
Wheel based of course.....you need 5 numbers (pivot numbers) which together
with his neighbors cannot mix with others pivot numbers and his neighbors. So each
group of 3 numbers ( the pivot and 2 neighbors) don t mix up with others, can be close/touch but not same numbers.Also the
2 neighbors not necesary to be on each side
of the pivot number, can be both in only one side. The pivot is the number that hit.
Important is when track you can modify the
2 numbers in the group( not the pivot) in such way (right or left) to make place to other new pivot and his 2 numbers, all this only if necesary, if not possible retrack.
When you have the 15 numbers, 5 groups each with 3 numbers, start to bet that 15.
If lose bet 18 numbers, so add the new pivot
and 2 neighbors, if not possible close neighbors then close numbers. If lose again
bet 21 numbers, so add new pivot and 2 numbers ( neighbors or close numbers/ ""free"" numbers). If lose again bet 24 numbers ...same....add pivot and 2 numbers. The idea is to catch a repeat of the pivots numbers or the neighbors......still remain 13 numbers which can hit, but i see
big chance to hit that (15,18',21) 24 numbers. Hope you understand the idea.
Some progression is necesary for 15, 18, 21, 24 numbers
HELLO,,..im bringing up my old WOF-system again, that i abandoned too soon,?! :question:
NOW, playing (current number hit) with the WOF neighbors-
with progression 1 1 1 2 2 2 STOP (Win or lose), then picking the new current number hit and it's WOF neighbors...etc
Great results from the first test.
I don't want to give anyone false hope. I tested this further and had 2 losses in a row, either the progression is too agressive, or too many numbers bet. Or the betselection/trigger is bad. idk
Thank you for ignoring me, now let this fall into oblivion again..... :question:
Quote from: ignatus on May 15, 10:48 AM 2018
I don't want to give anyone false hope. Don't we hate it! I tested this further and had 2 losses in a row, Don't you hate it
Thank you for ignoring me, Don't you hate it!
LOL!
Quote from: Bigbroben on May 15, 10:51 AM 2018I don't want to give anyone false hope. Don't we hate it!
Really? atleast im testing my own ideas, until they fail, ...if you hate it/"new" ideas why you on the forum, it's not "new" but i need to test it, and? perhaps others learn from my mistakes, TESTING so...they don't have to make the same mistake, ...iknow im a slow learner, but that's how i work... :/
Dont worry I feel the same when my tests fail! I appreciate what you're doing. It is important to be transparent like you are.
My HABS did not do so well this time, will post anyway.