Well now, i am prepared to make a fool out of myself (again) ....we'll see ! :twisted:
Procedure: Bet all columnstreets, except the last 3 columnstreets hit. (one columnstreet is for an example numbers 1-10) Each columnstreet is bet with 2 splits. For an example columstreet 1-10; Split 1-4, Split 7-10;
Now, When all columnstreets are bet (with splits), all except the last 3 hit columnstreets, double bets for each loss until hit. After each hit bets are placed anew with 1u bets (all except last 3 hit columnstreets)...and so on
(First test was played with 1u bets)
well now, this may not be as bad as you may first thought,?
Highest step in progression from the second test was 16u, that was in the chart a 120u drop.--compared playing with an ordinary 1-3-9-27-81 progression we now get 1-2-4-8-16. imo much better! Recovery is good, drawdowns are not bad, hitrate seem to be good and not such a great BR is needed. (about ~300u-400u would be enough)....
Quote from: ignatus on Sep 05, 08:15 AM 2017
Well now, i am prepared to make a fool out of myself (again) ....we'll see ! :twisted:
Procedure: Bet all columnstreets, except the last 3 columnstreets hit. (one columnstreet is for an example numbers 1-10) Each columnstreet is bet with 2 splits. For an example columstreet 1-10;
Columnstreets?
Very creative name and so is this method (since very few methods advocate betting on columnstreets) -- thanks for sharing this. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Again we make it without any greater problems! :) (all played with random spins in RX)
Now you see it???
Well, as always, moneymanagement is key, and for this one, a decent stoploss would be if the progressionline 1-2-4-8-16 is lost, that would be -414u,, so? a BR of 420u and a wingoal of +200u perhaps...(still more testing is needed)...
I don't know if i was right about the -414u?? (maxrisk?)
but here the chart show two losses of progressionline 1-2-4-8-16.... What i can see it's about a -375u drawdown, so it's almost correct, then??
Well, i guess i leave it at this now,... (yet another loss)
Quote from: ignatus on Sep 06, 09:16 AM 2017
I don't know if i was right about the -414u?? (maxrisk?)
but here the chart show two losses of progressionline 1-2-4-8-16.... What i can see it's about a -375u drawdown, so it's almost correct, then??
The 1 2 4 8 16 progression is a tad bit too steep.
Maybe cap it off with a Hermes leveller, 1 2 4 4 4 4 ...... and continue at the 4 level until a designated stop loss or in profit.
Hmmm
Hermes leveler may do well at casino war
or perhaps you could recommend one of GLC progressions :twisted:
Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Sep 06, 10:09 AM 2017Maybe cap it off with a Hermes leveller, 1 2 4 4 4 4 ...... and continue at the 4 level until a designated stop loss or in profit.
i was about to give up,.. but perhaps it could work better with that one, yes?, i'll try...thx :)
Also, i'll do the testings with live-spins, now (and not random spins)
Well now! Hermes progression seems to work very well with this system, (almost as it were perfectly adapted to it!) thankx again Doctorsudoku! :thumbsup:
Played with Live spins(5u bets)
wingoal +500
stoploss -500
Again i give up,.. :-\ there is no way improving this one,-- it's a random bet that doesn't work, obviously,.. no matter what progression you use. 4/8 Games won