#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Testing zone => Topic started by: ignatus on Nov 14, 09:10 AM 2017

Title: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 14, 09:10 AM 2017
Only did 4 tests, (more testings needed!) but it seems to work.. drawdowns happen, but recovery is good ... The video became alittle longer than usual (13 min),

ICE AGE: (ment to be played with 1u bets, 5u for demonstration)
bet the 3 unhit STREETS on the opposite side of the current number (i.e.you *don't* bet the last 3 hit STREETS)

wingoal: +100u (1u bets) +500u (5u bets)
BR/Stoploss: 200u (1u bets), 1000u  (5u bets)

Progression: 1 1 1 2 2 (After that +1u until hit)



(Testings so far, done with random spins in RX)
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 14, 11:45 AM 2017
9/10 Games won O0 >:D 8) :thumbsup:

I hope you enjoyed it as much as i did!  :D

Calculation of wins/losses~

losses: -1000
wins: 9*500= +4500

Total: +3500u

Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: boyd30 on Nov 14, 01:43 PM 2017
Can you give an example of how you play by numbers Ignatus? Sorry, I don't understand the video.
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 14, 01:54 PM 2017
Quote from: boyd30 on Nov 14, 01:43 PM 2017
Can you give an example of how you play by numbers Ignatus? Sorry, I don't understand the video.

Alright, those streets i *Remove* IS the last streets hit, within that particular H/L (i look at the history of spins)...hope that makes things more clear?
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 14, 08:11 PM 2017
First tests played with 1u bets.
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: boyd30 on Nov 14, 10:20 PM 2017
So if you have this sequence 10, 1, 23, 4, 5, 35...now you remove street 10 -12, 1-3 and 4-6 and bet on street 7-9, 13-15 and 16 -18. I guess this is correct?
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 14, 10:22 PM 2017
Quote from: boyd30 on Nov 14, 10:20 PM 2017
So if you have this sequence 10, 1, 23, 4, 5, 35...now you remove street 10 -12, 1-3 and 4-6 and bet on street 7-9, 13-15 and 16 -18. I guess this is correct?

Yes, that's right! 
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: Ratwood85 on Nov 15, 12:39 AM 2017
How many straight loss happened with this system ? Maybe with your experience i will try to wait for several loss before start betting.
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 15, 03:33 AM 2017
Quote from: Ratwood85 on Nov 15, 12:39 AM 2017
How many straight loss happened with this system ? Maybe with your experience i will try to wait for several loss before start betting.

I should've saved that chart, i had a 200u drawdown when i was at +200u (played with 1u bets) so i guess a 300u BR should cover 99% of the losses,...i'll continue my testings..
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: Roulettebeater on Nov 15, 03:37 AM 2017
This is a near-HG system.
You should keep this a secret...I will try it
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 15, 04:19 AM 2017
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Nov 15, 03:37 AM 2017
This is a near-HG system.
You should keep this a secret...I will try it

;D thx ...Well? Drawdowns do happen, but most of the time it will recover, it's just a question on time, how much time you want to spend on recovery,... but with a small wingoal OK, i will now play a longer session, we'll see,.. (All testings done with random spins in RX)....haven't tested it with Live-spins, yet
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 15, 05:32 AM 2017
Quote from: Ratwood85 on Nov 15, 12:39 AM 2017How many straight loss happened with this system ?

Well, as you can see in this chart-- Highest bet was 20u (played with 1u bets)...(i am not prepared to try to recover from this), AND i keep the original MM --> Stoploss : -200u, Wingoal: +100u
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 15, 02:00 PM 2017
i'll continue testing this one...  :thumbsup:

(seems to be the best i can come up with, for now)..
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: Roulettebeater on Nov 15, 02:27 PM 2017
Ignatus, i already told you ... this has all advantages to be named "the near-HG Strategy"
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 15, 03:06 PM 2017
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Nov 15, 02:27 PM 2017
Ignatus, i already told you ... this has all advantages to be named "the near-HG Strategy"

I can't code this in RX, more and longer tests are needed?, but playing for manually, i can test it only for short sessions, (but that's OK, because it's meant to be played *short sessions* with a wingoal of 100u, it may win 8/10 or 9/10) we'll see...(?)
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 15, 03:23 PM 2017
Test 13.
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 16, 02:49 PM 2017
Test 14. First Live-session, (played with 1u bets) Still need feedback/help testing...
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: Roulettebeater on Nov 16, 02:53 PM 2017
Quote from: ignatus on Nov 16, 02:49 PM 2017
Test 14. First Live-session, (played with 1u bets) Still need feedback/help testing...

and you haven't seen all yet how far can this go
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 16, 03:05 PM 2017
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Nov 16, 02:53 PM 2017
and you haven't seen all yet how far can this go

Well right now we have 13/14 Games won, (with the original MM +100/-200) so yes? So far so good. (Still it needs to be tested more)...for me, it takes time and effort to do testings, (but then i enjoy it)...what's your results roulettebeater?
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: Roulettebeater on Nov 16, 03:28 PM 2017
Quote from: ignatus on Nov 16, 03:05 PM 2017
Well right now we have 13/14 Games won, (with the original MM +100/-200) so yes? So far so good. (Still it needs to be tested more)...for me, it takes time and effort to do testings, (but then i enjoy it)...what's your results roulettebeater?

in average it's winning 8/10 over a sampling of a few thousands spins
Title: Re: ICE AGE
Post by: ignatus on Nov 16, 03:37 PM 2017
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Nov 16, 03:28 PM 2017
in average it's winning 8/10 over a sampling of a few thousands spins

Alright, thx  :thumbsup: