inspired from Doctorsudoku;
"That progression is intolerably long. Can't you just incorporate some virtual losses at the beginning and make that progression several steps shorter?"
IF you don't mind the waiting for triggers, this may be It.
Procedure: consider these groups/pairs
RED LOW <--> BLACK LOW
RED HIGH <--> BLACK HIGH
Now you'll WAIT for a trigger; 3 minimum hits within one group/pair (without the Other pair being hit) WHEN the other pair HIT, you bet the remaining 8 unhit numbers within that particular group.
Progression: 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 17 22 28 36 46 59 76 98 126 162 208 268
BR/Stoploss: 300u.
Wingoal: 300u
3/3 Games won
(Played with 1u bets & Live-spins)
Quote
inspired from Doctorsudoku;
"That progression is intolerably long. Can't you just incorporate some virtual losses at the beginning and make that progression several steps shorter?"
Progression from last system: 2 3 4 6 8 11 16 22 30 42 58 80 111 154 213
This: 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 17 22 28 36 46 59 76 98 126 162 208 268
???
Quote from: celescliff on Dec 04, 05:37 AM 2017
Progression from last system: 2 3 4 6 8 11 16 22 30 42 58 80 111 154 213
This: 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 17 22 28 36 46 59 76 98 126 162 208 268
???
There is nothing to do about it, well? use your own fibonacci-ladder or +1/-1 whatever you like, ?? for me, it's simple with a ordinary negative progression, BECAUSE with this system, hitrate should be good, good enough to stay within the BR/Stoploss at 300u (in most cases). I Did 3 tests so far, all won, (more testing is needed) . But as i said, stop complaining and use your own progression (IF you don't like the ordinary neg. progression!)
5/5 Games won
Correct me if this wrong.
Example :
3,12,1 <---trigger (3minimum hits) then wait next spin: 3,12,1,6,10,34 (34 is latest spin result) then bet 19,21,23,25,27,30,32,36
is this right ???
The 2 Groups/pairs are
(1) RED LOW <--> BLACK LOW
(2) RED HIGH <--> BLACK HIGH
so,
3, RL
12, RL
1, RL ---> TRIGGER 3 RED LOW's hit without BLACK LOW being hit.
6, BL---> Trigger BET, (bet all Black Low's except number 6); numbers 2,4,8,10,11,13,15,17.
10, WIN
34
7/7 Games won
Quote from: ignatus on Dec 04, 07:19 AM 2017
The 2 Groups/pairs are
(1) RED LOW <--> BLACK LOW
(2) RED HIGH <--> BLACK HIGH
so,
3, RL
12, RL
1, RL ---> TRIGGER 3 RED LOW's hit without BLACK LOW being hit.
6, BL---> Trigger BET, (bet all Black Low's except number 6); numbers 2,4,8,10,11,13,15,17.
10, WIN
34
Thanks for explanation. And what if
3,12,1 then 26. Wait another trigger or bet high black without 26 ?
Quote from: Ratwood85 on Dec 04, 08:21 AM 2017
Thanks for explanation. And what if
3,12,1 then 26. Wait another trigger or bet high black without 26 ?
3,12,1 is ONE trigger (Low-trigger), after you get 1 trigger,---> you wait for the opposite color to hit within that particular H or L in this case 3,12,1 (Red Low-trigger) you wait for 1 Black Low number to hit, before bet.
Number 26 is BLACK HIGH. (You need 3 of those Black High to hit), without Red High to hit --(Trigger) IF you get 3 Black High's to hit without Red High hit (trigger) then you wait for 1 RED HIGH to hit, before bet...etc
I don't know if I'm doing it right. I only got two betopportunities in 100 spins. Ex. If you get this in row, 2,4,6,1..then you bet all low red except 1. But if you get it like this you don't bet? 2,4,6, 32, 1..no bet? Looks like a good system but the waiting time can be long.
Quote from: ignatus on Dec 04, 08:35 AM 2017
3,12,1 is ONE trigger (Low-trigger), after you get 1 trigger,---> you wait for the opposite color to hit within that particular H or L in this case 3,12,1 (Red Low-trigger) you wait for 1 Black Low number to hit, before bet.
Number 26 is BLACK HIGH. (You need 3 of those Black High to hit), without Red High to hit --(Trigger) IF you get 3 Black High's to hit without Red High hit (trigger) then you wait for 1 RED HIGH to hit, before bet...etc
okay i got it,
with this negative progression :
1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 17 22 28 36 46 59 76 98 126 162 208 268
where is your biggest bet so far when you testing it ? do you ever hit in 36bet ??
Quote from: boyd30 on Dec 04, 01:08 PM 2017I don't know if I'm doing it right. I only got two betopportunities in 100 spins. Ex. If you get this in row, 2,4,6,1..then you bet all low red except 1. But if you get it like this you don't bet? 2,4,6, 32, 1..no bet? Looks like a good system but the waiting time can be long.
Yes, there are 2 parts of the Trigger ONE part is getting 3 hits of any of the pair/groups without the other pair being hit, for an example in your case 2,4,6 (Trigger-BLACK LOW) THEN comes the "Trigger-BET"-->waiting for 1 hit in RED LOW, (before bet).
Quote from: Ratwood85 on Dec 04, 01:45 PM 2017okay i got it,
with this negative progression :
1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 17 22 28 36 46 59 76 98 126 162 208 268
where is your biggest bet so far when you testing it ? do you ever hit in 36bet ??
Yes, the progression has gone out of hand afew times, the winrate IS about ~80% (from my first testings). But with a 50/50 wingoal/stoploss; (300/300) you *Should* be able to make overall profits.
8/10 Games won
My luck turned at the End of this first session but The End-result IS a 80% winrate.
9/11 Games won
i'll continue testing...