Hi, guys!
What about play other "table"... The roulette wheel is always the same but it only indicate us a number for three different games.
First game:
We bet for last Dozen.
Second game:
We bet for last position.
Third game:
We bet for last distance.
All games are for one dozen to win, but sometimes we will bet all three dozens.
So, apart the fact that we will loose faster, is there something in this combined game that can help us?
Example:
Dozen 1, dozen 3, dozen 1, dozen 2, dozen1, dozen3
1,3,1,2,1,3
Spin 1
1st game.
Bet 1u on dozen 1
2nd game
Bet 1u on dozen 1
3rd game
Bet 1u on dozen 1
Spin 2
1st game.
Bet 1u on dozen 3
2nd game
Bet 1u on dozen 2
3rd game
Bet 1u on dozen 1
Spin 3
1st game.
Bet 1u on dozen 1
2nd game
Bet 1u on dozen 3
3rd game
Bet 1u on dozen 3
Spin 4
1st game.
Bet 1u on dozen 2
2nd game
Bet 1u on dozen 3
3rd game
Bet 1u on dozen 3
And so on...
A little error in the third game.
Spin 1
Bet dozen 2
Spin 2
Bet dozen1
Spin 3
Bet dozen 1
Spin 4
Bet dozen 2
Can you clarify what last position and last distance are?
So we have
Spin 1
2u on dozen 1
1u on dozen 2
Result: -3
Spin 2
1u on dozen 1
1u on dozen 2
1u on dozen 3
Result -3
Spin 3
2u on dozen 1
1u on dozen 3
Result -6
Spin 4
2u on dozen 2
1 unit on dozen 3
Result -9
Quote from: vladir on May 29, 05:29 PM 2018Can you clarify what last position and last distance are?
Last position
If we start with a dozen sequence like this 1,2,3
And 1 came out
We asign it position 1 and our new sequence is 1,2,3
If we start with a dozen sequence like this 1,2,3
And 2 came out
We asign it position 2 and our new sequence is 2,1,3
If we continue with sequence 2,1,3
And 1 came out
We asign it position 2 based on our previous sequence
Quote from: vladir on May 29, 05:29 PM 2018
Can you clarify what last position and last distance are?
I was about to ask...!
Let's take an example
Dozens:. 1322123
Dozen. Position. New sequence
123
1. 1 123
3. 3. 312
2. 3. 231
2. 1. 231
1. 3. 123
2. 2. 213
3. 3. 321
Distance
Dozen. Position. New sequence. Distance
123. 0
1. 1 123. 1. We look at the distance from last position to new position, so in our case distance from 0 to 1 is 1
3. 3. 312. 2:. Distance from 1 to 3 is 2
2. 3. 231. 0. Distance from 3 to 3 is 0
2. 1. 231. 1 distance from 3 to 1 is 1
1. 3. 123. 2
2. 2. 213. 2
3. 3. 321. 1
Well,
do a run test and show us!
Well,
I won't.
Hello Mr. Praline.
What he has written is peculiar, because studying a little about rrbb, which I saw in this forum some time ago from very old publications, I came to those 3 conclusions, but I never thought about playing them mixtures.
He even created different ways of doing it that worked quite well, but didn't work in the long run playing flat.
I speak individually playing, but regarding how you have explained it, I have not tried it, but I will.
I can contribute some ideas regarding what you have exposed.
What I also did, was to look for the repetition of the cycles, referring to the position and distance game.
example position:
123 is the position base.
comes number 25, dozen 3, it would look like 312, therefore it was position 3.
the next ball plays to position 3 which would be to play to the 2 dozen.
and so on!
distance example:
012 is the distance base.
Number 25 and number 2 comes out, I always count it in one direction, to the right! is distance 1.
As the number is 2, I am looking for the repetition of said distance, therefore, I will play a dozen 2.
I have also done this individually, but not together, even together and playing flat can be beneficial !! interesting!!
Also poor other ideas, because in this, there are many possible ways to do it, but I am not sure that it can create an advantage, but of course I will continue reading, because I have already done all this that you are talking about, but I am surely something else is missing !!!
I will be attentive to your publications and I will try to contribute everything I can within my short time.
Sorry for my bad English, I use a translator, because it is not my language.
Hector
This has been at betfair online casino.
It does not behave badly at all, but I think it has behaved like any system playing flat, concentration and dispersion.
I imagine some ingredients are missing to make this work better.
Everything has been flat bet and playing all the time followed.
Here I leave the results of more than 500 balls, because I got tired and I already have to go to sleep.
Hector
Hector,
This topic was created almost 3 years ago, and it was just an idea, I didn't even tried to code it to see if it works, because I found that you actually don't have to code or run million spins to see if an idea can work.
This one is a looser because spins are independent from previous and partitions are equally likely.
I stopped with this topic for another reason: people want you to test everything for them and to give them the solution on the golden platter. In fact you are the first person who actually posted a results for it.