What do you guys think on an outside bet say h/l .
If you place 10000 bets and you never lose a 10 step progression would this be playable?
Why would you never lose?
Quote from: Winner on Dec 03, 10:32 AM 2018
What do you guys think on an outside bet say h/l .
If you place 10000 bets and you never lose a 10 step progression would this be playable?
Hands off layout bets !
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Dec 03, 10:35 AM 2018
Hands off layout bets !
[/quote
Ok what about 100,000 bets and never bust a 10 step progression?
Quote from: Bigbroben on Dec 03, 10:34 AM 2018
Why would you never lose?
[/quo
Would this be a H G that everyone talks about.
Not sure the HG hides within ECs...
But if you say so.
Why would it not lose 10 steps?
Quote from: Bigbroben on Dec 03, 10:49 AM 2018
Not sure the HG hides within ECs...
But if you say so.
Why would it not lose 10 steps?
No reason just curious.
Quote from: Winner on Dec 03, 10:32 AM 2018
If you place 10000 bets and you never lose a 10 step progression would this be playable?
If it's below table limits, then sure, I guess.
How to get an edge flat betting .
This is the title from the other forum betselction.cc
The progression is
1111 2 4 8 16 32 64.
I have a bet selection that would beat this at 10000 spins
The guy by the name ozon beat it at 500,000 spins
I don’t have the means to test that many spins.
Well, explain and we'll give it a shot!
Yes Sir
Big Bro Ben is the man for the job :thumbsup:
Quote from: Winner on Dec 03, 05:41 PM 2018
How to get an edge flat betting .
This is the title from the other forum betselction.cc
The progression is
1111 2 4 8 16 32 64.
I have a bet selection that would beat this at 10000 spins
The guy by the name ozon beat it at 500,000 spins
I don’t have the means to test that many spins.
Guys,
That's not flat betting. That's still a progression.
The drink gets flat after a few hundred spins, though.
Quote from: Winner on Dec 03, 05:41 PM 2018
How to get an edge flat betting .
This is the title from the other forum betselction.cc
The progression is
1111 2 4 8 16 32 64.
I have a bet selection that would beat this at 10000 spins
The guy by the name ozon beat it at 500,000 spins
I don’t have the means to test that many spins.
Winner,
I read the post on betselection.
Just want to make sure I understand ok:
After a 3rd consecutive loss, you start the 1,1,1,1,2,4,8,16,32,64, or do the first 1s include the 3 losses?
This prog is about MM anyways.
Any special bet selection?
Quote from: Bigbroben on Dec 03, 10:45 PM 2018
Winner,
I read the post on betselection.
Just want to make sure I understand ok:
After a 3rd consecutive loss, you start the 1,1,1,1,2,4,8,16,32,64, or do the first 1s include the 3 losses?
This prog is about MM anyways.
Any special bet selection?
I think the 1s include the 3 losses.
Quote from: The General on Dec 03, 09:50 PM 2018
Guys,
That's not flat betting. That's still a progression.
The title is misleading
Do you have a bet selection?
I'm running millions of spins right now and it's down at house edge.
A bust comes about 0.62 times per 1000 spins on average.
Follow the Last, in this simulation.
Quote from: Bigbroben on Dec 03, 11:42 PM 2018
Do you have a bet selection?
I'm running millions of spins right now and it's down at house edge.
A bust comes about 0.62 times per 1000 spins on average.
Follow the Last, in this simulation.
[/quote
I suck at explaining systems.
130 millions spins later:
Edge: -2.73%
0.619 bust per 1000 spins.
Quote from: Bigbroben on Dec 04, 08:35 AM 2018
130 millions spins later:
Edge: -2.73%
0.619 bust per 1000 spins.
This proves roulette is unbeatable monster . So we should all stop trying.
No, it means the test I ran failed.
I don't know yet what your bet selection was.
It is also to be verified if the prog I used was ok.
Did you personally test the systems you mentioned above? Did it work good?
I used Excel random, it's no real wheel nrs, so who knows...
Quote from: Bigbroben on Dec 04, 09:13 AM 2018
No, it means the test I ran failed.
I don't know yet what your bet selection was.
It is also to be verified if the prog I used was ok.
Did you personally test the systems you mentioned above? Did it work good?
I used Excel random, it's no real wheel nrs, so who knows...
I used Radom.org
I think it will lose.