Hi everyone. If you know to code (I guess on RX or any coding way you know) and are interested to test a system let me know in my inbox so that we can talk about it.
It's an inside numbers system. So far I have done 2163 spins manually and I am +5736 units but I obviously can't keep up manually when we need 100K 500K 1M etc for some serious testings :-\
Quote from: BellagioOwner on Jul 01, 08:56 AM 2019
Hi everyone. If you know to code (I guess on RX or any coding way you know) and are interested to test a system let me know in my inbox so that we can talk about it.
It's an inside numbers system. So far I have done 2163 spins manually and I am +5736 units but I obviously can't keep up manually when we need 100K 500K 1M etc for some serious testings :-\
Please share
Quote from: sugtips on Jul 01, 10:36 AM 2019Please share
it's really late here and dead tired. i'll check the messages tomorrow but thanks guys.
sugtips if it ends up with positive results after 100K or 200K spins I promise to let you know if it's worth sharing or it was just a lucky fluke in the start. It's not a system that I totally reinvent the wheel anyway. It's based on various older posts I've seen here on some approaches that I like, combining few such parts and theory of hot numbers :)
I know that maths/stats leave no room for hot numbers to exist/be exploited but I do also know that the answers provided by the maths/stats guys (I am one too) don't really fully answer the objections of the hot number supporters. Let's just everyone not derail the topic on yet another hot numbers' debate :)