Greetings dear ones,
This is my first post in here, I want to contribute to the collective thinking processes of this group as I have learned a lot from your work, this post will be an attempt to provide us with a new insight that may help triggering new ideas and concepts for the whole group.
Let's begin.
First we start by creating an empty table for our 37 cycle.
1
2
3
4
5
.
.
.
35
36
0
Next we spin and we record the numbers in the following way:
Spin #1 : 4
1
2
3
4 ( 1)
6
7
8
.
.
.
We now go to excel and use randbetween(1;12) function to generate a random number from 1 to 12. ( you can use random.org if you like).
And whatever number is generated by the function we assign it in the table to our number that we just recorded from our roulette spin.
In our example Randbetween() returned # 11.
1
2
3
4 (1) (11)
5
6
7
8
.
.
.
We are going to track each unique number we get from spinning the wheel and we will assign a random number from 1 to 12 to it and continue until the cycle is completed by two numbers next to each other.
See the following example:
Spin numbers : 23 - 2- 36 -2- 32 - 12 - 13
Using randbetween() assigning random (1-12) to our spun numbers as they occur one by one, not after they have all occurred.
23 (5) -2 (11) - 36 (3) - 2 (11) - 32 (12) - 12 ( 8 ) - 13 (1)
Note that while assigning random numbers to the spun numbers you must not assign the same random (1-12) number to two different spun numbers.
Now tracking would look like this :
1
2 (2) (11)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 (1) (8)
13 (1) ( 1) (the cycle ends here)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 (1) (5)
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 (1) (12)
33
34
35
36 (1) (3)
0
We have created a game within a game, our new game have 1/12 or slightly more in rare cases to win.
In our example the cycle ended in the seventh spin and the wining number was 8.
Work is needed to find the right money management strategy it should be elegant.
Work is needed to write the code in Mathematica framework or C# or python to figure out the exact statistics for the maximum limit for the cycles.
From my own observations It usually take around 9 spins on average to complete a cycle.
The winning number pays 35:1 as we bet a single number.
The limit so far is 1/12.
Best regards, The old Soul. (8)
Welcome to the forum! Nice for you to join us
In your example 36 was the 3rd spin but it also has random number 3 assigned to it.
You assigned 36 (1)(3)....Instead of 36(3)(3)
Then the rest of the spins continued assigning (1).....???
Quote from: MoneyT101 on Sep 16, 12:27 AM 2019
In your example 36 was the 3rd spin but it also has random number 3 assigned to it.
You assigned 36 (1)(3)....Instead of 36(3)(3)
Then the rest of the spins continued assigning (1).....???
I wrote (2) in front of number 2 in the table because it occurred twice.
The same goes for 36 I wrote (1)(3)
In front of it as to say it occurred once and 3 is the random number that is assigned to it.
Quote from: MoneyT101 on Sep 16, 12:02 AM 2019
Welcome to the forum! Nice for you to join us
Thank you :)
welcome..herby is the main mathematica guy on the forum i,m sure he can help
Hi theoldsoul, welcome to the forum.
I'm confused. From this :
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 15, 07:54 PM 2019Next we spin and we record the numbers in the following way:
Spin #1 : 4
1
2
3
4 ( 1)
6
7
8
I took it that the (1) next to the 4 indicates the spin number (the first spin), but it seems this isn't so. And I'm not sure how a cycle is defined? Perhaps you could give another example showing when and what number(s) you actually bet on?
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 15, 07:54 PM 2019Work is needed to write the code in Mathematica framework or C# or python to figure out the exact statistics for the maximum limit for the cycles.
Welcome.
I prefer R, but yes. Curious why do you think we need the max limit here?
Max limit is for designing the MM.
My guess is TOS has done the coding work to determine it to be 12.
Quote from: luckyfella on Sep 16, 07:10 AM 2019
Max limit is for designing the MM.
My guess is TOS has done the coding work to determine it to be 12.
Cool answer to a very different question.
Why would that (MM) be necessary?
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 15, 07:54 PM 2019From my own observations It usually take around 9 spins on average to complete a cycle.
The winning number pays 35:1 as we bet a single number.
You can't expect an average payout of 35-1 on a bet which hits once every 9 spins, even the General doesn't get that on his best days. ;D
Quote from: Joe on Sep 16, 03:36 AM 2019
Hi theoldsoul, welcome to the forum.
I'm confused. From this :
I took it that the (1) next to the 4 indicates the spin number (the first spin), but it seems this isn't so. And I'm not sure how a cycle is defined? Perhaps you could give another example showing when and what number(s) you actually bet on?
I thought the same thing.... the spin numbers. But he said no... it’s the spin count of the number.
So if 1 shows up it’s (1)
If 1 repeats then it’s (2)
I also believe the winning of a cycle would be for a neighbor to win.
He said “by two numbers next to each otherâ€. In the example 12 and 13 were the only numbers and he counted it as a win.
The confusing thing for me was the random number 8. I never saw the reason for assigning random numbers. But in his other thread he speaks of a combination bet
So I’m guessing this here is the same thing....that random number must have been in combination with a street( I think but not sure yet)
Quote from: MoneyT101 on Sep 16, 08:43 AM 2019
I thought the same thing.... the spin numbers. But he said no... it’s the spin count of the number.
So if 1 shows up it’s (1)
If 1 repeats then it’s (2)
I also believe the winning of a cycle would be for a neighbor to win.
He said “by two numbers next to each otherâ€. In the example 12 and 13 were the only numbers and he counted it as a win.
The confusing thing for me was the random number 8. I never saw the reason for assigning random numbers. But in his other thread he speaks of a combination bet
So I’m guessing this here is the same thing....that random number must have been in combination with a street( I think but not sure yet)
That is correct, there are several ways to play using this tracking approach, like I said earlier this article is designed to trigger intuition for those whom are working on figuring out a way to exploit the law of the third, cycles, repeaters and so on.
Quote from: Joe on Sep 16, 07:56 AM 2019
You can't expect an average payout of 35-1 on a bet which hits once every 9 spins, even the General doesn't get that on his best days. ;D
The average so far is 9 spins for a cycle to be completed, it may be 16 spins but in the long run the it converges to around 9 spins.
Quote from: luckyfella on Sep 16, 07:10 AM 2019
Max limit is for designing the MM.
My guess is TOS has done the coding work to determine it to be 12.
That is correct.
Quote from: 6th-sense on Sep 16, 03:13 AM 2019
welcome..herby is the main mathematica guy on the forum i,m sure he can help
Thank you :)
I hope he may be interested to write the code for us.
In the next following input, I will show how to use the same tracking method described above to play smaller sample spaces, with different cycle limit.
Thinking does not allow for or create insight so let’s quit it with the thought experiments.
Quote from: Blueprint on Sep 16, 01:48 PM 2019Thinking does not allow for or create insight
It does if you know how to think. ;)
So what, in your opinion, does create insight?
Quote from: Joe on Sep 16, 02:48 PM 2019
It does if you know how to think. ;)
So what, in your opinion, does create insight?
Cessation of thinking and no-thing else.
Quote from: Joe on Sep 16, 02:48 PM 2019
It does if you know how to think. ;)
So what, in your opinion, does create insight?
When thinking you limit your experiences to what can be infered from memory which is always limited.
In the other hand pure observation alone allows for unknown patterns to show themselves ..
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 15, 07:54 PM 2019In our example the cycle ended in the seventh spin and the wining number was 8.
8 is the winning number? In what universe?
Quote from: Blueprint on Sep 16, 07:29 PM 2019
8 is the winning number? In what universe?
If you are tracking both clockwise and anti-clockwise 8 is the winning number in both universes lol, otherwise if you are tracking only one side 8 is the winning number in this universe :p
Just kidding about the universe thing,
We are interested in the cycle being complete by two numbers being next to each other in the order they are arranged by in the table, in my case I was tracking only the numbers that are next to each other however I am only interested in the pair in which the lower value is the past and the higher value is the one we actually bet on in the wheel.
So the winning number is 8 because it's the lower value in the pair that ended the cycle.
Using your universe terminology, we have the initial universe which is the wheel with 37 degrees of freedom.
And the second universe which has only 12 degrees of freedom.
6 degrees of freedom changed my life.
Appreciate you clarifying.
Quote from: Blueprint on Sep 16, 07:59 PM 2019
6 degrees of freedom changed my life.
Appreciate you clarifying.
You're welcome :)
I knew your math knowledge increased with reading all those books but you went above and beyond to different levels 😅
Thanks for posting again...
Hope this will share some new ideas with some and also correct me if I am wrong
So in my journey what I noticed when I combined things... my mindset shifted from trying to win each time to trying to win overall.
So my idea was if I can play a combination in which I can win where either point meets.
If I’m playing Game A and game B...
I don’t care which game wins as long as I’m in profit when either game wins
So that’s the idea I’m picking up from your explanation also
So when you put it like that; it’s a matter of how do you apply the units correctly to create this new game
Quote from: MoneyT101 on Sep 16, 08:25 PM 2019
I knew your math knowledge increased with reading all those books but you went above and beyond to different levels 😅
Thanks for posting again...
Hope this will share some new ideas with some and also correct me if I am wrong
So in my journey what I noticed when I combined things... my mindset shifted from trying to win each time to trying to win overall.
So my idea was if I can play a combination in which I can win where either point meets.
If I’m playing Game A and game B...
I don’t care which game wins as long as I’m in profit when either game wins
So that’s the idea I’m picking up from your explanation also
So when you put it like that; it’s a matter of how do you apply the units correctly to create this new game
That's correct :)
I use graphs because it's very easy to create a new game on the go.
It makes it easy for my brain to visualize every connection, permutation, or combination with replacement or without replacement to create parallel games like you pointed out, and the goal is to use the new game you created as soon as it's downloaded through intuition, it works because in the first few hours or sometimes minutes from downloading the virtual game the logical mind has to make calculations in order to balance it back to zero sum. But before it finishes the calculations something else takes place through the belief system that actually detects real patterns and you end up winning :)
I hope everyone benefits from this information it's the most valuable piece of information that turns luck upside down ;)
Probable future articles and thoughts:
In the future I will provide you with demo games that will make your logical brain stuck in a loop of computation for a few hours or days depending on your ability to decipher the error in the belief system that brings back the momentum of your positive energy down therefore the momentum of your luck down.
While it's on a loop however your positive energy will go up and that's the right time to play the game .
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 16, 03:02 PM 2019In the other hand pure observation alone allows for unknown patterns to show themselves ..
Yes, it's call apophenia. Actual thinking is needed to determine whether those patterns mean anything.
Don't forget everything is MAYA :thumbsup:
Quote from: Joe on Sep 17, 03:02 AM 2019
Yes, it's call apophenia. Actual thinking is needed to determine whether those patterns mean anything.
Interesting perspective
Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 17, 04:55 AM 2019
Don't forget everything is MAYA :thumbsup:
It's all about Maya :)
.
Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 17, 04:55 AM 2019Don't forget everything is MAYA :thumbsup:
What's MAYA?
link:s://youtu.be/uJRtTaEhs_4
Maya, (Sanskrit: “magic†or “illusionâ€) a fundamental concept in Hindu philosophy, notably in the Advaita (Nondualist) school of Vedanta. Maya originally denoted the magic power with which a god can make human beings believe in what turns out to be an illusion.
I sell advanced approachs, if interested contact me.
Website is under construction at the moment.
My teaching includes advanced spiritual observations and pure mathematical formulas related to probability theory that you will not find anywhere else online unless you figure things out by yourself.
Regards, the Old Soul (8)
I Have already shared enough ideas for those who don't have enough money to pay for my services, in the next following days I will share spreadsheets like the one in the picture bellow for free for anyone who contacts me via email.
The ones I offer my services to are those who have enough resources and are not afraid to pay 2000 dollars for metaphysical and spiritual growth in addition to advanced roulette approachs of course.
<a href="link:s://ibb.co/9rKqKQ1"><img src="link:s://i.ibb.co/rw8Z8Dz/Screenshot-2019-09-17-23-33-49.png" alt="Screenshot-2019-09-17-23-33-49" border="0"></a>
This sales pitch thread should be moved to the for sale section. :thumbsup:
Quote from: Taotie on Sep 17, 08:03 PM 2019
This sales pitch thread should be moved to the for sale section. :thumbsup:
I get it, you're broke.
Don't worry I won't tell anybody, it will be our secret ;)
Stupid people don't even know how to calculate how much money it will take them to build a house by themselves, as opposed to how much it costs to pay the experts to do it for them.
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 17, 08:28 PM 2019
I get it, you're broke.
Don't worry I won't tell anybody, it will be our secret ;)
I apologize I should be polite answering your comment, I agree this topic may be delete.
Admin you have my permission to delete this article.
I apologize for everyone else if offended you, I won't be answering any emails from now on.
The Old Soul was here :p
Brought you some fresh content I know you are hungry for more, but I believe you can easily find the next step by yourselves.
Blueprint, it was an honor to connect as well.
Best regards, The Old Soul (8)
...and Theoldsoul throws a tantrum and spits the dummy like a childsoul, lol!
Oh, the irony.
Please don't be offended. I for one was enjoying your posts. It's just that the forum has rules, one of which is no selling of systems, products or services outside the for sale section. Which you are clearly doing.
PS, I built houses for a living for 28 years so I know how to work out the costings, and it's surprisingly cheaper to do it yourself.
Nothing wrong with selling, just done in the wrong section.
The geometric patterns are interesting.
However, there is still the connection to probability theory to construct a viable systems play.
Quote from: Taotie on Sep 17, 09:16 PM 2019
...and Theoldsoul throws a tantrum and spits the dummy like a childsoul, lol!
Oh, the irony.
Please don't be offended. I for one was enjoying your posts. It's just that the forum has rules, one of which is no selling of systems, products or services outside the for sale section. Which you are clearly doing.
PS, I built houses for a living for 28 years so I know how to work out the costings, and it's surprisingly cheaper to do it yourself.
You are right the old Soul is still part human lol forgive me dear one 🙏
Quote from: Joe on Sep 17, 03:02 AM 2019
Yes, it's call apophenia. Actual thinking is needed to determine whether those patterns mean anything.
Patterns mean nothing unless there's some math inference to draw from, else it's just nice pattern that attracts the layman.
If you still don't know. How to apply what I showed you, you should consider spending your time doing something else you are good at.
Why do I keep offending people, the energy of this forum is really weird.
I am out of here.
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 17, 09:49 PM 2019
If you still don't know. How to apply what I showed you, you should consider spending your time doing something else you are good at.
It sounds harsh and rude but I agree.
Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 17, 04:29 PM 2019Maya, (Sanskrit: “magic†or “illusionâ€) a fundamental concept in Hindu philosophy, notably in the Advaita (Nondualist) school of Vedanta. Maya originally denoted the magic power with which a god can make human beings believe in what turns out to be an illusion.
"everything is MAYA"
Well, not
everything can be maya (illusion) because "everything" includes the statement "everything is MAYA", and so the philosophy would undermine itself. And there must be something other than illusion otherwise we couldn't call it "illusion", as compared to reality.
I've read this argument before.
The answer is and I'm still learning as I only discovered MAYA through quantum physics...
Not that everything is an illusion in the sense that it does not exist it's more that what we are seeing and experiencing how it appears to us is not the true reality.
Some example such as we see a traffic light turn red.
It looks instant to us but really we are seeing things in the past due to the time it takes for the light to reach our eyes and our brains to process that.
This is the most nonsense thread I've ever seen. :o
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 17, 06:48 PM 2019
pay 2000 dollars for metaphysical and spiritual growth in addition to advanced roulette approachs of course.
<a href="link:s://ibb.co/9rKqKQ1">
Lol
Quote from: Andre Chass on Sep 18, 03:10 AM 2019
This is the most nonsense thread I've ever seen. :o
Oh, I don't know. Some of your threads have been right up there. :xd:
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 17, 09:56 PM 2019Why do I keep offending people, the energy of this forum is really weird.
F*CK YOU.Wtf u talking about???
Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 18, 02:51 AM 2019Not that everything is an illusion in the sense that it does not exist it's more that what we are seeing and experiencing how it appears to us is not the true reality.
Some example such as we see a traffic light turn red.
It looks instant to us but really we are seeing things in the past due to the time it takes for the light to reach our eyes and our brains to process that.
But there is no unreality in what "appears", and two aspects of reality doesn't mean that one is false. To take your example, just because the light appears to our eyes to turn red instantly doesn't mean it's an illusion, because it's also a reality that light can't travel instantaneously; the only "unreality" is us not taking this into account. Just because our understanding of reality is limited at the current time (and probably always will be) is no basis for assuming that "everything is Maya". Before science, humans explained events in terms of magic and gods, and unfortunately there is still a tendency to do that.
Quote from: Joe on Sep 20, 06:30 AM 2019
But there is no unreality in what "appears", and two aspects of reality doesn't mean that one is false. To take your example, just because the light appears to our eyes to turn red instantly doesn't mean it's an illusion, because it's also a reality that light can't travel instantaneously; the only "unreality" is us not taking this into account. Just because our understanding of reality is limited at the current time (and probably always will be) is no basis for assuming that "everything is Maya". Before science, humans explained events in terms of magic and gods, and unfortunately there is still a tendency to do that.
Go on like that , nice lecture !
How should the average person translate this into workable idea in terms of roulette ?
I am a fully paid up athiest my understanding of MAYA is very scientific.
When you look at Milk 🥛 you see white liquid but really it's a bunch of atoms.
This is the Maya.
Quote from: Let Me Win on Sep 20, 09:07 AM 2019When you look at Milk 🥛 you see white liquid but really it's a bunch of atoms.
It doesn't make sense to say the glass of milk is "really" a bunch of atoms. The two descriptions are not mutually exclusive, but just two views or aspects of the one reality. If the glass of milk that we see and drink and the bunch of atoms were mutually exclusive, it would mean that the latter was real and the former imaginary, but the glass of milk has to exist (as a glass of milk) otherwise no bunch of atoms would exist. No glass of milk means no bunch of atoms and the atoms cannot exist independently of some form (whether it be a glass of milk, a human being, or a galaxy). Just because we see the atoms structured in a certain way doesn't mean the structure itself is "unreal".
Niels Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics is just one of many.
link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics
Einstein disagreed with him when he famously said "God doesn't play dice".
Let me ponder the milk for a while :)
But to quote Hawking... "Thus it seems Einstein was doubly wrong when he said, God does not play dice. Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen."
link:://:.hawking.org.uk/does-god-play-dice.html
The Einstein and Bohr debate was settled in Bhor's favour by John Bell (Bell's theorem).
Quote from: MoneyT101 on Sep 16, 08:25 PM 2019
I knew your math knowledge increased with reading all those books but you went above and beyond to different levels 😅
Thanks for posting again...
Hope this will share some new ideas with some and also correct me if I am wrong
So in my journey what I noticed when I combined things... my mindset shifted from trying to win each time to trying to win overall.
So my idea was if I can play a combination in which I can win where either point meets.
If I’m playing Game A and game B...
I don’t care which game wins as long as I’m in profit when either game wins
So that’s the idea I’m picking up from your explanation also
So when you put it like that; it’s a matter of how do you apply the units correctly to create this new game
Are you pointing to game theory payoffs here?
Another thing, I know a lot of you get caught up on dependencies (me, too) so something to consider.
There are TWO forms of dependencies.
Play around with "numbers" - what dependencies can you or have you come up with.
And play around with fruits and veggies - what dependencies still hold.
Great collaborative effort here!
See ya. Be on the lookout for a compiled version of EVERYTHING that has been shared in book form.
Good luck all.
Oh, and 100% will be donated to a charity of my choice.
Later.
Quote from: Blueprint on Sep 25, 09:55 AM 2019
Great collaborative effort here!
See ya. Be on the lookout for a compiled version of EVERYTHING that has been shared in book form.
Good luck all.
Trouble here blueprint if someone shared that true dependency then that in itself will show you how to win on any location
That’s the hg with a bit of insight how to use it
Nobody even yourself if you know how would share that ..
I myself wouldn’t ..as you say you don’t need to think of numbers just use sticks and stones it’s all the same
It's already been shared.
Quote from: Blueprint on Sep 25, 11:15 AM 2019
It's already been shared.
Depends on the version people think is actual dependency
Quote from: Blueprint on Sep 23, 08:05 PM 2019
Are you pointing to game theory payoffs here?
I’m pointing to exactly what I said, no hidden cryptic message.
Quote from: Blueprint on Sep 24, 01:58 PM 2019
Another thing, I know a lot of you get caught up on dependencies (me, too) so something to consider.
There are TWO forms of dependencies.
Play around with "numbers" - what dependencies can you or have you come up with.
And play around with fruits and veggies - what dependencies still hold.
Yes very good post
Quote from: 6th-sense on Sep 25, 11:11 AM 2019
Trouble here blueprint if someone shared that true dependency then that in itself will show you how to win on any location
That’s the hg with a bit of insight how to use it
Nobody even yourself if you know how would share that ..
I myself wouldn’t ..as you say you don’t need to think of numbers just use sticks and stones it’s all the same
But I already shared this information. When I kept saying numbers don’t matter and they don’t mean anything. They are just a visual for us but you can use anything.
It’s just a matter of using the right combination to win. How to use the info to your advantage.
Quote from: MoneyT101 on Sep 25, 12:05 PM 2019I’m pointing to exactly what I said, no hidden cryptic message.
Depends on the view ;)
I started my own topic since we are getting off topic here, check it out...
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26317.msg231369;topicseen#msg231369
Quote from: 6th-sense on Sep 25, 11:11 AM 2019
Nobody even yourself if you know how would share that ..
It will happen eventually I think. Some people will accidentally share too much without even realizing it. And for some crazy people the fame and the satisfaction of proving everyone wrong on the forum would worth more than the HG itself. Even just proving that a HG exist without sharing it could cause a big damage. Immediately many thousands of people would jump in and solve all the riddles in two weeks. I admire how careful Priyanka was to only share ideas and concepts but never show where, when and how to apply them.
Let's stop lauding someone who has helped no one but themselves.
Hi everyone I am back (8) , I can't get access to my email inbox so I can't see if anyone sent any messages I apologize for that and for calling the energy of the forum weird, Steve should apologize for his childish behavior as well it does not suit someone who is administrating an online public space.
Anyway ..
Thoughts ...
Order in randomness of a dynamic system exists relative to the state of mind of the observer.
Meditation is the process of entering the correct state of mind that correlates with cosmic order.
Here is an example in which The observer is the old Soul, and the dynamic system is a random number generator (roulette-simulator) the correlation was perfect and it resulted in winning 7/8 bets that consists of 12 numbers each.
<a href="link:s://ibb.co/ZW2qKK5"><img src="link:s://i.ibb.co/yW4H55t/Screenshot-2019-09-30-12-50-28.png" alt="Screenshot-2019-09-30-12-50-28" border="0"></a>
I don't really give a fu#ck what you think, if you disagree with the content of my articles simply don't comment,
just walk away.
If you "enter the correct state of mind that correlates with cosmic order" and all you can think of doing is play roulette, then you have a problem.
I am using roulette to prove my abilities to my brain.
And also because I really love the game.
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 30, 08:07 AM 2019Steve should apologize for his childish behavior as well it does not suit someone who is administrating an online public space.
1. You've confused immaturity with understanding of relative importance and sense of humor.
2. Open speech is far more important than political correctness.
3. You see my conduct as immaturity. I see your giving a shit about it as immaturity.
Anyway perhaps move on.
And what kav says is correct in my experience. In the scope of things, roulette is meaningless crap. The more you develop, the less relevant money becomes. But we're still humans living in a world where money provides security, for now.
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 30, 08:45 AM 2019
I am using roulette to prove my abilities to my brain.
And also because I really love the game.
My experience with spiritual development and roulette is they dont quite mix. They are opposites if your goal is profit.
Quote from: Steve on Sep 30, 08:52 AM 2019
My experience with spiritual development and roulette is they dont quite mix. They are opposites if your goal is profit.
My experience shows that they can be mixed for plenty of goals including profit.
Quote from: Steve on Sep 30, 08:50 AM 2019
1. You've confused immaturity with understanding of relative importance and sense of humor.
2. Open speech is far more important than political correctness.
3. You see my conduct as immaturity. I see your giving a shit about it as immaturity.
Anyway perhaps move on.
And what kav says is correct in my experience. In the scope of things, roulette is meaningless crap. The more you develop, the less relevant money becomes. But we're still humans living in a world where money provides security, for now.
1- you are right about this one, not the understanding of relative importance, but the part about the sense of humor, I tend to have a rather selective sense of humor.
2- Open speech? I wrote to you about disabling the option that stops us from editing our past articles in your forum, haven't heard a word from you about that. Is that open speech?
3- Yes, you are right, we are still both immature.
Quote from: Steve on Sep 30, 08:52 AM 2019
My experience with spiritual development and roulette is they dont quite mix. They are opposites if your goal is profit.
This is nothing but a belief. Spiritual AND materialism are nothing but concepts. This divide only occurs within your mind which is also nothing but a concept.
There exists one psychological action that causes a mutation to take place in the brain, which then allows for the right kind of learning processes that leads to insight into the whole of existence.
Probability theory is a concept that can work within thought, and also a behavioral matrix system that can replace thought temporarily.
link:s://youtu.be/wkDTl2fqjJI
The probability of wining 7 times in a row while betting on a single dozen is :
1/2​187 = 0.0004 pretty awesome.
the only time that you can hear your soul, is when everything else is quiet.
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 30, 09:27 AM 20191- you are right about this one, not the understanding of relative importance, but the part about the sense of humor, I tend to have a rather selective sense of humor.
(link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=26303.0;attach=41916;image)
You don't find this amusing?
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 30, 09:27 AM 20192- Open speech? I wrote to you about disabling the option that stops us from editing our past articles in your forum, haven't heard a word from you about that. Is that open speech?
Anyone can edit their own posts within 5 minutes of posting. If I disabled that option, people wouldnt be able to correct mistakes.
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 30, 09:27 AM 20193- Yes, you are right, we are still both immature.
Am not.
Quote from: Steve on Sep 30, 08:38 PM 2019
(link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=26303.0;attach=41916;image)
You don't find this amusing?
Anyone can edit their own posts within 5 minutes of posting. If I disabled that option, people wouldnt be able to correct mistakes.
Am not.
Fu#ck you very much for the lovely contribution.
Freaking stupid ego.
Watch out, you're gonna be visited by a few guests in the next following days, will make you suffer nightmares for the rest of your life.
Or this. Funny, disturbing, confusing, or something else?
I find it all three. Funny because I mean it's a Chimp forcing itself on a frog (or toad). Disturbing, because it's like a chimp and frog. Confusing because the parents are letting that poor kid be damaged by being around this.
Actually, it's not about ego. It's partly for amusement, and partly something else. Basically, I think much of what you've said is dribble, which you dont understand yourself. You may even be leading up to selling the "holy grail".
Quote from: Theoldsoul on Sep 30, 08:44 PM 2019Watch out, you're gonna be visited by a few guests in the next following days, will make you suffer nightmares for the rest of your life.
Meditate more. You're becoming aggressive.
Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
As an old soul, I thought you'd understand you cant willingly harm someone else without bringing it back on yourself in some way.
666.
I'll be more direct. You have spouted lots of stuff with seemingly no understanding of what you're preaching, while behaving like a guru. This annoys me. And when people annoy me, I sometimes poke them. It's not wise, but I'm human too. It doesn't help that you had a go at me first.
It is fine to share ideas which have little or no merit. But it's not fine to preach such concepts to others like you're a guru, especially when you don't appear to understand or even fully believe in what you're preaching.
Do your satanic ritual. I'm betting I'll still sleep well.
More insufferable pretentious gobbledegook from the old ass-soul. ::)
It does if you know how to think.I hope you may be to tell us.