1st off hello to anyone who reads this thread...
Now to get to the Q&A of this...
I've been playing roulette since last year around June and I just like the idea of the "fast money" but we all know the casino has to keep their lights on and of course the "house edge/advantage"... So I have been looking at this site for YEARS to get a lil knowledge and I think I had a login a long time ago but anyways...I re-signed up and I wanna become an active member and learn more from the players here who are really making something off of it which I know it isn't a get rich over night but I more or less wanna play for a few hours and make a few hundred or so to start....
So for the most part I have been seeing people CONTINUOUSLY saying "don't buy/pay for roulette systems", which I already know, but in the options menu located where the 3 dashes are it says "Roulette Systems" but then the 2nd "system" is named "Physics Roulette System (Best Legal Systems)" and as enticing as it looks and sounds, even with the money back guarantee, the makers are from Australia but has anyone tried it or can vouch for it...?
You're referring to my system. You wont get accurate feedback in public because:
1. Players submit a NDA. Players who are happy stick to the NDA, so you dont hear "positive" feedback.
2. Players who dont do well of course wont give a crap about sticking to the NDA. In the past 15 or so years I've been teaching players, there are well over 1,000 players (I think about 1,200 last time I checked), there have been around 10 genuine players of mine who publicly criticized my techniques. That' a very low rate. Not everyone will understand it. A few are bound to make mistakes and blame others instead of themselves.
3. There are several malicious individuals who post blatant crap about me and my technology. It's most "competitors" (if you call them that), but also people that have been banned from my forums for things like trolling or spamming.
Advantage play is not new. Techniques like visual ballistics are part of what I teach, and are well-known to work in suitable conditions.
Sure you can ask for feedback, but getting accurate, unbiased and honest feedback isnt so simple as explained above.
So how do you know the truth? Just take one of the trials. For example, take the free course. Test the free approaches I explain. That's what it's for. Then if you want to be better assured, take the 7-day trial so you test the full version.
There are many valid techniques to beat roulette. More specifically, a small handful of approaches work, but there are many individual techniques - each with their own set of good and bad points. What I provide is what I find to the overall best approaches. And it's important to understand, I dont teach just one method. The main method is software and an approach for betting before the ball release. A secondary approach is my own visual ballistics method.
There is no single method that beats 100% of wheels. The truth is you need to use the correct method for the conditions you play in.
Quote from: Steve on Nov 14, 06:05 PM 2019
You're referring to my system. You wont get accurate feedback in public because:
1. Players submit a NDA. Players who are happy stick to the NDA, so you dont hear "positive" feedback.
2. Players who dont do well of course wont give a crap about sticking to the NDA. In the past 15 or so years I've been teaching players, there are well over 1,000 players (I think about 1,200 last time I checked), there have been around 10 genuine players of mine who publicly criticized my techniques. That' a very low rate. Not everyone will understand it. A few are bound to make mistakes and blame others instead of themselves.
3. There are several malicious individuals who post blatant crap about me and my technology. It's most "competitors" (if you call them that), but also people that have been banned from my forums for things like trolling or spamming.
Advantage play is not new. Techniques like visual ballistics are part of what I teach, and are well-known to work in suitable conditions.
Sure you can ask for feedback, but getting accurate, unbiased and honest feedback isnt so simple as explained above.
So how do you know the truth? Just take one of the trials. For example, take the free course. Test the free approaches I explain. That's what it's for. Then if you want to be better assured, take the 7-day trial so you test the full version.
There are many valid techniques to beat roulette. More specifically, a small handful of approaches work, but there are many individual techniques - each with their own set of good and bad points. What I provide is what I find to the overall best approaches. And it's important to understand, I dont teach just one method. The main method is software and an approach for betting before the ball release. A secondary approach is my own visual ballistics method.
There is no single method that beats 100% of wheels. The truth is you need to use the correct method for the conditions you play in.
Firstly, Hey Steve! (lol)
I've been watching how you reply to a lot of posts and we are similar when it comes to using common sense bc not everyone has it, lol, but moving on to the reply at hand...I appreciate you moving my question to the right category and giving me an accurate answer to my question bc I did in fact sign up for the free course and I read mostly every page, I think, involving the free course as well as the trial and full version and I'm on day 2 of the emails. As far as NDA, which I had to google what that meant, I agree on if you agree to it you should stick to it as agreed. I'm currently trying to get the 7-day trial money together bc I wanna see what the system is like bc I'm sure you'd piece together that if I'm looking at your system that "I've been through a million". I kinda figured it was your system, but wasn't 100% sure, when I seen your forum photo after I seen it big on the system page. I will definitely be reaching out via Skype when I am fully ready for the trial/full version... Again thanks for replying.